版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
RichardVosserAC
(44-20)7742-6652
richard.vosser@
JamesDGordon
(44-20)7742-6654
james.d.gordon@
LaerkeLEngkilde
(44-20)7742-2917
laerke.enkilde@
CoryKasimovAC
212-622-5266
cory.w.kasimov@
GavinScott
212-622-0579
gavin.scott@
TurnerKufe,MD
212-622-4104
Turner.kufe@
GlobalEquityResearch
April2021
Takeaways
GlobalBioPharma–2021USAtopicDermSurvey
EUPharma&Biotech
USBiotechnology
USMajor&SpecialtyPharma
ChristopherSchott,CFAAC
212-622-5676
christopher.t.schott@
ChristopherNeyor
212-622-0334
christopher.z.neyor@
EkaterinaV.Knyazkova
212-622-9576
ekaterina.v.knyazkova@
XilingChen
212-622-0364
xiling.chen@
J.P.MorganSecuritiesLLC
J.P.MorganSecuritiesPLC
Seetheendpagesofthispresentationforanalystcertificationandimportantdisclosures,includingnon-USanalystdisclosures.
J.P.Morgandoesandseekstodobusinesswithcompaniescoveredinitsresearchreports.Asaresult,investorsshouldbeawarethatthefirmmayhaveaconflictofinterestthatcouldaffecttheobjectivityofthisreport.Investorsshouldconsiderthisreportasonlyasinglefactorinmakingtheirinvestmentdecision.
1
KeyProductTakeaways
1Dupixent:Surveypointstocontinuedgrowthacrossadults,adolescentsandpediatricsbutwithadoptionandgrowth
stillskewedtoadults.JAKsseenhavinglimitedimpactonuse.
1Adults:Respondentsindicatea8ppincreaseinuseto33%ofalladultpatientswithinthenext3yearssupportingastronggrowthoutlookforDupixentinadults.AhigherproportionofdermatologistsconsiderDupixentuseinmoderatepatientscomparedtoour2020survey,potentiallypointingtoabroadeningoftheopportunity.
1Adolescents:Adolescentprescribinglagscurrentuseinadults(14%vs.25%ofpatients),andthesurveypoints3ppofincreaseduseinadolescentswithinthenext3years
1Pediatrics:Asexpected,physiciansaremostcautiousinpediatrics,with64%indicatingtheywouldonlyconsiderDupixentuseinseverepatientsvs.36%foradolescentsand12%foradults.Evensodermatologistsstillexpecttoincreaseuseinthenext3yearsto11%ofallpediatricpatients.
1JAKsimpact:DermatologistsseealimitedimpacttotheirDupixentuse3yearsaftertheapprovalofJAKs.
1JAKs:Viewedpredominantlyas2Ltherapiesalbeitwithasizablemarketopportunity.Rinvoqpreferredchoiceoverabrocitinib
1MostphysiciansseeJAKSofferingsuperiorefficacybalancedagainstinferiorsafetyrelativetoDupixentandexpecttousethemprimarilyas2LbiologicagentsfollowingtopicalsandDupixent.Thatsaid,~25%ofphysicianexpecttomovetheseagentsto1Lovertimeastheygainexperiencewiththeproducts.
1Onsafety,physiciansappearsomewhatconcernedwithclottingriskassociatedwiththeJAKclass,whichisnotsurprisinggiventherecentheightenedconcernsonsafety.
1OnRinvoqvsabrocitinib,physicianshaveapreferenceforRinvoqbasedonbetterefficacyandsomewhatcleanersafety.Payercoveragewillalsoplayaroleinuptake(whichshouldfavorRinvoq)
1OnthehigherdosevslowdoseRinvoqdebate,oursurveypointstoaverylimitedimpacttoexpectedshareintheeventofjusta15mgapproval(notaltogethersurprisinggivenexpecteduseinDupixentfailures).Inaddition,mostrespondents(80%)donotseethesingletreatment-emergentdeathforRinvoqinitsH2HstudywithDupixentimpactingtheirprescribingdecisions
1Ontopicalruxolitinib,highratesofutilizationbyphysiciansareexpectedacrossalldiseaseseveritiesforbothpediatricandadultpopulations(slides34)
1Docsareenthusiasticaboutthepotentialfortopicalruxandseeutilizationacrossthespectrum(mild/moderate/severe)ofbothadultandpediatricpatients.Suggesteduseintheseverepopulation(andevenoversystemicagents)issomewhatpeculiarasithasnotbeenstudiedinthissubset.
2
KeyCompanyTakeaways
ABBV:SurveyhighlightsanattractiveopportunityforRinvoqasthepreferredoralJAKtherapyandawithbetterthan
expectedviewonlow-doseonlyapprovalscenario
1WithRinvoqemergingasthepreferredoralJAKinthissettingandafairlysizable2Lopportunityovertime,weseeADasanattractivenewindicationforthedrug.
1Further,asmostphysicianseea15mgonlyapprovalunlikelytoimpacttheirprescriptionchoice,weseeanupwardbiastoourestimates(~$1.5bnpeaksalesinADwith15mgapprovalasabasecaseandbothdoseapprovalasclearupside)
1Allinall,wecontinuetoseeAtopicDermasanimportantindicationforRinvoqsupportingour~$12bnpeaksalesestimatefortheproduct
PFE:ResultslargelyinlinewithexpectationswithabrocitinibupsidelargelytiedtooverallgrowthoftheADmarket
1WeseesurveyresultslargelyconsistentwithourexpectationswithrespondentsgenerallyexpectingtouseoralJAKsas2LtreatmentandpreferringRinvoqoverabrocitinib.Thesedynamicsarelargelyreflectedinourestimateswhereweforecast~$900mmsalesfortheproductin2025
1Atthesametime,wehighlightthatatopicdermremainsasignificantlyunder-penetratedindicationandexpectsolidbiologicmarketgrowthtosupportsolidgrowthforbothabrocitinibandRinvoqoverthenextfewyearsastheseneweragentsexpandthemarket
SAN:SurveycontinuestohighlightstronggrowthoutlookforDupixentinADacrossallagegroups.
1Respondentshighlighttheyexpecttocontinuetoincreasetheiruse,overthenext3years,ofDupixentinallagecategories(adultsby>30%,adolescentsby20%andpediatricsby>50%).ThisunderpinsourcurrentDupixentUSforecasts,whichweforecasttogrowfrom$3.2bnin2020to$6.5bnin2023,a20-23CAGRofc.26%.Thiscomprisesc.80%ofourglobalDupixent2023salesforecastof$8.2bn(€7.4bn),whichisc.7%aheadofConsensus.Inaddition,theexpectationofalimitedimpactfromtheJAKinhibitorsshouldprovideinvestorswithincreasedconfidenceSanofi’sabilitytoachieveorevenexceedtheir€10bnpeaksalestargetforDupixent.OverallthesurveyreinforcesourbeliefthatDupixentwillcontinuetodeliveraheadofexpectations.
3
KeyCompanyTakeaways
REGN:OverallthesurveysupportsastrongoutlookforDupiinADwhichdoesn’tcomeasasurprise;ultimatelythelongterm
questionishowbigisbig?
1Weanticipatedafavorablephysicianoutlookfordupi,andthat’sconsistentwiththeresultsobserved.Whilethere’ssomelingeringnoisearoundpotentialcompetitionfromJAKs–atleastbasedonourinvestorconversations–physiciansaren’tindicatingameaningfulthreatinthenear-to-midterm.
1Wecurrentlymodel~$10BinpeakWWsalesfordupi.Theadultsegmentcomprises~63%ofourWWdupiestimatesin2021andweexpectalineardeclineto~51%in2025asadolescent/pedsgainshareintheintermediate-to-longterm.
1MorebroadlyforREGN,mostscrutinyisaroundEylea’stail,themid-to-longertermoutlookforREGN-COVantibodycocktailandthepotentialofthecompany’semergingoncologyfranchise.Webelievetheseissueshavemorepotentialtodriveinvestorsentiment,asthere’slittleprevailingcontroversyarounddupi.
INCY:AnticipatingfavorableuptakeforruxcreaminADinbothadultandadolescentpatients,potentiallyacrossthespectrumofdiseaseseverity
1WeanticipateruxcreamtobeakeyleverinINCY’sdrivetodiversify(fromJakafi)andgrowtheoverallbusiness.Tothatend2QisshapingupasanimportantperiodwiththeanticipatedapprovalofthetopicalproductforatopicdermatitisaswellasPhase3dataforvitiligo.Whilebotheventsarebroadlyanticipatedtohavefavorableoutcomes,itshouldgenerateincreasingattentionforthisasset.
1Importantly,thissurveysuggestsahighlevelofphysicianenthusiasmandpotentiallybroaderthananticipatedutilization.Wetakeanticipatedmarketsharedatapointsfromtheseexerciseswithagrainofsalt,butthetrendsareclearlyfavorable.Furthermore,amajorityofdocs(52%)evensuggestuseofruxcreamoversystemicagentsinmoderate-to-severepatients,despitenopivotaldatainthispatientsubset.
4
SurveyBackground
5
%breakdownofADpatients
SurveyBackground:MixOfPrivate/GroupPracticeinNon-HospitalSettings
1SurveywaslaunchedonApril9,2021.
1Enrollmentcriteria:Respondentsweredermatologistswith>15adultatopicdermatitispatientsundertheircareandwerefamiliarwithDupixent,JAKinhibitorsandtopicalruxolitinib.
1Respondentcharacteristics:Respondentshadanaverageof538patientsundertheircare,comprising357adultpatients,83adolescentpatients(age12-17),57pediatricpatientsaged6-11and41pediatricpatientsaged<6.
1Samplesize:N=25
1SurveyDemographics:40%respondentswerefromaprivatepractice,28%wereatagrouppracticeand32%werefromanacademiccenter/teachinghospital
100%
80%
60%
40%
32%
40%
28%
20%
0%
Grouppractice,non-HospitalAcademiccenter/teachingPrivatepractice,non-Hospital
setting(2+physicians)hospitalsetting
n=25
Source:J.P.MorganResearch
6
Note:Listofalltheanswerscanbefoundintheappendix
AdultADMarketByPatientSeverity
Ofyouradultatopicdermatitispatients,whatpercentageofyourpatientsareclassifiedasmild,moderate,and
severe?
1WefirstaskedoursurveyrespondentsthebreakdownofadultADpatientstreatedbyseveritywith37%/39%/24%beingmild/moderate/severecomparedtoour2020surveyof40%/36%/24%mild/moderate/severe.
1Withinthesecategories,ourrespondentsindicatedthat16%mild(2020:13%),45%moderate(2020:28%),and74%ofseverepatients(2020:50%)havefailedtopicalsteroids.
1JPMView:Whiletheoveralltrendisconsistentwithourexpectationsandprevioussurveyresults,thephysiciansinthisyear’ssurveyreportahigher%failureratethaninour2020survey,particularlyinmoderateandseverecases.ThiscontinuestohighlighttheopportunityinADpost-topicaltherapyandcouldpointtoincreasingcomfortwithDupixent.
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
WhattypeofadultADpatientsdoyouseeby
severity?
39%
37%
24%
MildModerateSevere
n=25
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
n=25
ForyouradultADpatients,whatpercentagehave
eachgrouphavefailedtopicaltreatments?
74%
45%
16%
Mild
Moderate
Severe
Source:J.P.MorganResearch
7
SurveyResults
(DupixentAdultPatients)
8
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0%
DupixentPrescribingByPatientSeverity
HowwouldyoudescribetheseverityofsymptomsrequiredtoconsidertreatmentwithDupixent?
1AllofourrespondentsrequiredmoderateorseveresymptomstoconsidertreatmentwithDupixentinatopicdermatitis.
1Comparedtolastyear’ssurvey,anincreasingnumberofrespondentsrequiredlessseveresymptomstostartDupixent,with88%ofrespondentsrequiringmoderatesymptoms(2020:64%),withabroadlycorrespondingreductioninthe%ofrespondentsrequiringseveresymptoms.
1JPMView:100%useinmoderate-severepatientsisbroadlyconsistentwithourexpectationsandourprevioussurvey,givenDupixent’scurrentlabelandhowdermatologiststypicallyviewsystemictreatments.Thehigherproportionofmoderatecases,relativetoseverecases,requiredtoconsiderDupixentuseispromisingasitsuggestsdermatologistsaremoreopentoconsideringDupixentuseearlieronindiseaseonset,broadeningtheoverallopportunity.
SeverityofsymptomsrequiredtoconsiderusingDupixent
2021SurveyResults
100%
88%
12%
Mild
Moderate
Severe
n=25
Source:J
.
P.MorganResearch
2020SurveyResults
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
64%
32%
4%
Mild
Moderate
Severe
n=25
9
2020SurveyResults
2021SurveyResults
31%
29%
25%
20%
0%
ContinuedGrowthforDupixentinAdultADExpected
Whatpercentage,ifany,ofyouradultatopicdermatitispatientsareyoucurrentlytreatingwithDupixentand
whatpercentage,ifany,doyouexpecttotreatwithDupixentoverthenext3years?
1Currentlyourrespondentsaretreating25%oftheiradultADpatientswithDupixent,whichisbroadlyconsistentwithoursurveyresultfromlastyearinwhichrespondentsexpectedtobetreating24%oftheirpatientswithin12months.
1Goingforward,thesedermatologistsexpecttoincreaseDupixentuseby8ppovera3yeartimeperiodtoatotalof33%.
1Dermatologists’viewonthesizeofthemarketopportunityaswellthepaceofgrowthhasincreasedsincelastyearwithatotalmarketopportunityof32%in2yearsfromnow(comparedto28%attheequivalenttimeinourpriorsurvey),anincreaseof7ppfromcurrentuse(comparedtoa4ppincreaseovertheequivalentperiodinthe2020survey).
1JPMView:Sinceourlastsurvey,dermatologistsseemtohavemoreconfidenceinthemarketopportunityforDupixent,expectingbothahigheroverallopportunityaswellasafasterramp.
%ofadultatopicdermatitispatientstreatedwithDupixent
100%
100%
80%
80%
60%
60%
33%
40%
20%
0%
32%
40%
22%24%
17%
26%28%
Currently6monthsfrom12monthsfrom2yearsfrom3yearsfrom
nownownownow
Currently6monthsfrom12monthsfrom2yearsfromnow3yearsfromnow
nownow
n=25
n=25
Source:J.P.MorganResearch,Companydata.
10
SurveyResults
(DupixentAdolescentandPediatricPatients)
11
Adolescent&PediatricADMarketsByPatientSeverity
Ofyouradolescent/pediatricatopicdermatitispatients,whatpercentageofyourpatientsareclassifiedas
mild,moderate,andsevere?
1Weaskedoursurveyrespondentsthebreakdownofadolescent/pediatricADpatientstreatedbyseverity.44%/36%/20%ofadolescentsweremild/moderate/severecomparedto51%/32%/17%pediatrics.
1Withinthesecategories,ourrespondentsindicatedthat11%/28%/56%mild/moderate/severeadolescentpatientshavefailedtopicalsteroids,comparedto14%/27%/53%pediatricpatients.
1JPMView:Respondentshighlightasmallerproportionoftheiradolescentpatientshavemoderatetoseveredisease(56%),comparedtoadults(63%)withevenfewermoderatetoseverepediatricpatients(49%)asexpected.Thesurveyalsoconfirmsthelowerrateoftopicaltreatmentfailureinbothadolescentsandpediatricscomparedtoadultswhichisalsoin-linewithexpectations.
WhattypeofadolescentADpatientsdoyouseeby
severity?
44%
36%
20%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Mild
Severe
Moderate
100%80%60%40%20%0%
WhattypeofpediatricADpatientsdoyouseeby
severity?
51%
32%
17%
Mild
Moderate
Severe
Source:J.P.MorganResearch
100%80%60%40%20%0%
100%80%60%40%20%0%
12
ForyouradolescentADpatients,whatpercentagehaveeachgrouphavefailedtopicaltreatments?
56%
28%
11%
MildModerateSevere
ForyourpediatricADpatients,whatpercentagehaveeachgrouphavefailedtopicaltreatments?
53%
27%
14%
Mild
Moderate
Severe
60%
40%
20%
0%
0%
0%
DupixentPrescribingByPatientSeverity
HowwouldyoudescribetheseverityofsymptomsrequiredtoconsidertreatmentwithDupixent?
1Inadolescentsandpediatrics,allofourrespondentsrequiremoderate-to-severesymptomstoconsiderDupixent,though:
1.AhigherproportionofphysiciansonlyconsideringDupixentinseverecasesforadolescentsthaninadults(36%vs.12%)andthemajority(64%)onlyconsideringDupixentforseverecasesinpediatricpatients.
2.ComparedtopediatricpatientsphysiciansaremuchmorecomfortabletouseDupixentinmoderateadolescentpatients,potentiallypartlyastheyhavegreaterexperienceusingtheproductinthesepatients.
1JPMView:Thisisconsistentwithourexpectations,highlightingphysicians’attitudestowardssystemictherapyinyoungerpatients,particularlyinpediatrics,wheretheyaremorecautious.Intheadultpopulation,confidenceinusingDupixentinmoderatepatientshasincreasedinthelastyear,with88%consideringuseinmoderatepatientsinthisyear’ssurveycomparedto64%in2020.Webelievewecouldseeasimilartrendovertimeinadolescents(March2019
approval)andpotentiallyeveninthepediatricsetting(May2020approval).
SeverityofsymptomsrequiredtoconsiderusingDupixent
Adolescents
100%
80%
64%
36%
MildModerateSevere
n=25
Source:J.P.MorganResearch
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%n=25
13
Pediatrics
64%
36%
Mild
Severe
Moderate
BothAdolescent&PediatricADofferGrowthPotentialforDupixent
Whatpercentage,ifany,ofyouradolescentandpediatricatopicdermatitispatientsareyoucurrentlytreating
withDupixentandwhatpercentage,ifany,doyouexpecttotreatwithDupixentoverthenext3years?
1Currentlyourrespondentsaretreating14%oftheiradolescentADpatientswithDupixentand7%oftheirpediatricADpatients.Goingforward,thesephysiciansexpecttoincreaseDupixentuseby3ppovera3yeartimeperiodinadolescentsand4ppinpediatrics.
1JPMView:ItisnotsurprisingthatphysiciansexpecttouseDupixentlessinAdolescentsandlessstillinPediatricsthanAdultsgiventheirexperiencelevelinagegroup.SomewhatsurprisingisthelowergrowthanticipatedinAdolescentscomparedtoPediatricpatients.Wewouldexpectphysicianusetogrowwithtimeinboththeseagegroupsastheygainmorecomfortinusingtheproduct.
%atopicdermatitispatientstreatedwithDupixent
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
n=25
Adolescents
3pp
17%
16%
14%
15%
15%
Currently6monthsfrom12monthsfrom2yearsfrom3yearsfrom
nownownownow
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
n=25
Pediatrics
4pp
11%
10%
8%
7%6%
Currently6monthsfrom12monthsfrom2yearsfrom3yearsfrom
nownownownow
Source:J.P.MorganResearch
14
SurveyResults(Rinvoq/Abrocitinib)
15
PhysiciansSeeSafetyandEfficacyAsTopFactorstoConsiderForNew
Agents
Pleaseratethefollowingcharacteristicsonascaleofimportancefrom1to5,where1=relativelyLEAST
importantand5=relativelyMOSTimportant,whendecidingtoprescribeanewproductliketheseJAKsforthetreatmentofyouratopicdermpatients.
1Safety/tolerabilityandEfficacywerethemostimportantfactorforphysicianswhiledosingfrequency/formappearrelativelylessimportantwhentreatingatopicdermpatients.Wealsohighlightthatmajorityofphysicians(68%)considerprice/accesstobeamongtop2factorsintheirprescriptionprocess.
1JPMView:Thisresultislargelyinlinewithourexpectationswithsafetyrepresentingoneofthetopfactorsphysiciansconsiderwhileprescribinganewproductinthisindication(particularlygivenrecentheightenedconcernoversafetyoftheJAKclass).Thatsaid,withefficacyrepresentingaclosesecondfactor,wecontinuetoseeanopportunityforthesemoreefficaciousagenttoplayanimportantroleintheirtreatmentparadigmsforAD.
%rank4or5:100%100%68%56%36%
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
4.84.7
4.0
3.7
3.0
Safety/tolerabilityEfficacy
Price/Patientaccess
Dosingfrequency/form
Clinical
experience
16
Source:J.P.MorganResearch
PhysiciansSeesHigherEfficacyforJAKsBalancedAgainstInferiorSafety
vsDupixent
HowdoyouseethesenewJAKs'efficacyandsafetyprofilescomparedtoDupixent?
1WeaskedrespondentstorankRinvoqandabrocitinibagainstDupixentfrombothefficacyandsafetyperspective
1JPMView:Overall,theresultsarelargelyconsistentwithourexpectationswithmajorityofphysiciansnotingatleastmoderatelybetterefficacyforRinvoq/abrocitinibatbothdoses.Atthesametime(althoughunsurprisingly),thisisbalancedagainstmoderatelyinferiorsafetyforbothJAKproducts(withabrocitinibrankedmarginallyworsefromasafetyperspective)
100%
Efficacy(vsDupixent)
80%
100%80%60%40%20%
60%
36%
32%
32%32%
40%
28%
28%
28%0%
20%12%
16%
20%16%20%
12%
12%12%
8%
20%
8%
4%
4%4%
4%
8%
4%
0%
Rinvoq(15mg)Rinvoq(30mg)Abrocitinib(50mg)Abrocitinib(100mg)
100%
Safety(vsDupixent)
80%
52%
60%
44%
36%
28%24%
32%28%
40%
20%16%
20%
16%16%
20%
16%
20%
8%
4%4%
0%0%0%0%
8%4%
0%0%
4%
0%0%
Rinvoq(15mg)Rinvoq(30mg)Abrocitinib(50mg)Abrocitinib(100mg)
0%
n=25
Source:J.P.MorganResearch17
Significantlyinferior
Moderatelyinferior
Marginallyinferior
Aroundthesame
Marginallybetter
Moderatelybetter
Significantlybetter
AlongTheseLines,MajorityofPhysiciansSeesJAKsasa2LTreatment
OptionAfterDupixent
Whatroledoyouseetheseproductplayinginyourpracticeoverthenextseveralyears?
1Majorityofrespondents(80%)expecttousethesenewerJAKsasa2LtreatmentforpatientswhohavefailedtopicalsandDupixent.Thatsaid,aswelookahead,morephysiciansappearopentousingtheseasa1Ltreatment(~30%forRinvoqand~20%forabro)overthenext5yearsbasedonsuperiorefficacyprofile.
1JPMView:WeseetheseresultspointingtoJAKsasprimarily2Ltherapiesasphysiciansfamiliarizewiththeseneweragentsandgetcomfortablewiththeirrespectiverisk/benefitprofiles.Overtime,thereappearstobesomeinterestinmovingJAKs(particularlyRinvoq)upinthetreatmentparadigm(~25%ofdocs).WithlowoverallbiologicpenetrationintheADmarket,weanticipatealarge2LmarkettoevolvefortheJAKsovertimeevenif1LusageremainsprimarilywithDupixent.
100%80%60%40%20%0%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
1.
4%
0%
68%
64%
28%
24%
12%
4%
0%
12%
4%
In1-3
years
4%
Within1year
In3-5years
80%
76%
Abrocitinib(Pfizer)
76%
12%
4%
12%
0%
20%
12%
0%
4%
Rinvoq(AbbVie)
80%
Within1
In1-3
year
years
In3-5years
Source:J.P.MorganResearch18
1Ltreatment(failedtopicals)
2Ltreatment(failedtopicalsandanotherbiologic)
Other
Idon'tforeseeusingthis
product
%breakdownofphysicians
PhysiciansHaveAModestPreferenceForRinvoqOverAbrocitinib
GiventheefficacyandsafetyprofilesfortheneworalJAKs,doyouseeapreferenceinuse(ifbothapproved)
andcanyoudescribehowyouexpectbothproductstofitintoyourtreatmentparadigm?
1Among25surveyedphysicians,majorityofrespondents(64%)appeartohavenopreferenceoverthetwooralJAKswhile32%preferredRinvoqoverabrocitinib
1JPMView:Interestingly,whilemajorityphysiciansexpressnopreferenceyetbetweenthetwoJAKs,mostnotedthatultimateusewillbedecidedbyfactorslikepayercoverage(whichwilllikelybodewellforRinvoq/AbbVie).ForthosepreferringRinvoqoverabrocitinib,superiorefficacyandarelativelycleanersafetywerehighlighted.WeseethelikelybroaderformularycoverageforRinvoq(givenitswiderangeofindications)andnumericallyhigherefficacypointinggreateruptakeinADrelativetoabrocitinib.
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
n=25
64%
32%
4%
IpreferRinvoqover
Abrocitinib
IpreferAbrocitiniboverRinvoq
Nopreference
betweenthetwo
Nopreferencebetweenthetwo
Ithinkthatrefinementofthetargetsandusesinthemarketwillshapetheirrole.
Iwouldusebothdependingonpatient'spreferencefordosingregimenandinsurancecoverage
Themedicationsseemfairlycomparableatthispoint,andusewilllikelybedictatedbyfactorslikeinsurancecoverage.
Ithinktheevidenceisthattheywouldbeequivalenttherapies
afterdupixentthenjak
Bothhavethesametheoreticalriskprofiles
PreferRinvoqoverabrocitinib
needhigherdoseforAbrocitinibwhichincreasesideeffectpotential
GreaterEASI75andEASI90scoreswithRinvoq
Niceheadtoheaddatavsthegoldenstandard(dupixent)
Moreeffectiveandwelltolerated
efficacyseemedsignificantlymoreimpressivewithRinvoqoverAbrocitinb
moreefficacythantheother
PreferabrocitiniboverRinvoq
Thesafetydataisbetter
19
Source:J.P.MorganResearch
TheseDynamicsWillLikelyTranslateIntoHigherShareForRinvoqvs
Abrocitinib
1WeseeseveraldynamicsfrompreviousslidespointingtohigherRinvoqshare(vsabrocitinib)inAtopicdermincluding:
1PhysiciansseeRinvoqofferingbetterefficacyandslightlycleanersafetyatbothdoses,whicharebyfarthetop2factorsintheirprescribingdecisions
132%ofphysicianspreferRinvoqtoabrocitinibandamongthosewithnoclearpreference(64%),manynotedinsurance/payercoverageasthekeydecidingfactorwhichagainbodewellforRinvoq(sincebothhaveoraldosing)
1Whilebothwilllikelyremainpredominantly2Ltreatmentoptions,ahigher%ofphysiciansappearopentousingRinvoqas1Ltreatmentovertime(25%in5yrsvs17%forabro)
1Overall,oursurveypointstoawillingnesstoincorporateJAKsintotheirtreatmentparadigmswithabiastowardsRinvoqoverabrocitinib.Thisisveryconsistentwithourviewofthemarketandifanything,webelieveABBV’shistoricstrong
launchexecutioninimmunologyandlikelyfavorableRinvoq
100%80%60%40%20%
0%
Moderately/SignificanthigherefficacyvsDupi
60%
44%
48%
36%
100%80%60%40%20%0%
n=25
Abrocitinib(50mg)
Abrocitinib(100mg)
Rinvoq(15mg)Rinvoq(30mg)
Moderately/SignificantlyInferior
64%
60%
64%
safetyvsDupi
72%
Abrocitinib(100mg)
Rinvoq(15mg)Rinvoq(30mg)Abrocitinib
(50mg)
Source:J.P.MorganResearch
payercoveragecouldfurtherdifferentiatetheasset.
%AdoptioninAdultandAdolescentPatients
100%
80%
60%
40%
23%
25%
16%17%
20%
0%
RinvoqAbrocitinib
n=251-3yearsIn3-5years
20
%breakdownofphysicians
32%
Somewhat
concerned
OnSafety,MostPhysiciansAreSomewhatConcernedAboutDVT
AssociatedWiththeJAKClass
HowconcernedareyouabouttheblackboxwarningsonelevatedthrombosisriskassociatedwiththeJAKclass
whenprescribingRinvoqandabrocitinib?(NotetherehavenotbeenanyDVTobservedin
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 沈阳建筑大学《中国文化通论》2025-2026学年期末试卷
- 上海科学技术职业学院《大众媒介概论》2025-2026学年期末试卷
- 上海行健职业学院《修辞学》2025-2026学年期末试卷
- 乌兰察布医学高等专科学校《临床流行病学》2025-2026学年期末试卷
- 上海师范大学天华学院《中国传统文化》2025-2026学年期末试卷
- 山西国际商务职业学院《电子商务概论》2025-2026学年期末试卷
- 四平职业大学《项目管理与工程经济决策》2025-2026学年期末试卷
- 沈阳医学院《行政诉讼法》2025-2026学年期末试卷
- 上海兴伟学院《语法学》2025-2026学年期末试卷
- 房地产项目专员项目跟进考试题目及答案
- 新生儿体位管理课件
- GB/T 20151-2026光度学CIE物理光度系统
- GB/T 18570.9-2025涂覆涂料前钢材表面处理表面清洁度的评定试验第9部分:水溶性盐的现场电导率测定法
- 安徽省合肥市2025-2026学年上学期期末八年级数学试卷(含答案)
- 深度解析(2026)《LYT 3409-2024 草种质资源调查编目技术规程》
- 《2025茶艺》课件-泡茶用水的种类
- 产品销售运营协议书范本
- 2025年支部存在的问题及整改措施
- 平面优化设计讲解课件
- DRG支付下医院运营质量提升策略
- 直播带货合作协议标准范本
评论
0/150
提交评论