2023年GMAT作文范文及解析

第页共页2023年GMAT作文范文及解析2023年GMAT作文范文及解析GMAT作文范文及解析：修建多层停车场ThefollowingisfromaneditorialthatappearedinaRiverCitynewspaper.“TheClioDevelopmentGroupwantstobuildamultilevelparkinggarageonDockStreetinRiverCity,buttheplanshouldnotbeapproved.Mostofthebuildingsontheblockwouldthenhavetobedemolished.Becausethesebuildingswereerecteddecadesago,theyhavehistoricsignificanceandmustthereforebepreservedaseconomicassetsintheefforttorevitalizearestoredriverfrontarea.RecallhowLakesburghasbenefitedfrombusinessincreasesinitshistoricdowntowncenter.Moreover,thereisplentyofvacantlandforaparkinglotelsewhereinRiverCity.”给River城的报纸的编辑的一封信：Clio开展商不应该被允许在Dock街修建多层停车场，因为这个街区的大多数建筑将被摧毁。因为这些建筑是几十年前修建的，他们具有历史意义，因此应该在复兴沿河区域的努力中被保存做经济资产。回忆一下沿湖地区通过他们的有历史的中心街区的商业增长得到了多少好处。而且，River城的其他地方有足够多空地可以修停车场。文章反对摧毁古建筑来修建停车场。所以你应该说那些建筑没有什么历史意义，不一定会带来商业增长。RIVER城其它地方并没有空地，就只有DOCK街需要停车场其它地方远水解不了近渴，我们还可以通过其它方法防止摧毁建筑而又可以在DOCK街修建多层停车场GMAT作文范文及解析：销售降低的原因ThefollowingappearedinamemorandumfromthedevelopmentdirectoroftheLargoPianopany.“TheLargoPianopanyhaslongbeenknownforproducingcarefullyhandcrafted,expensivepianosusedbyleadingconcertpianists.Duringthepastfewyears,however,ourrevenueshavedeclined;meanwhile,theAllegroMusicalInstrumentpanyintroducedalineofinexpensivedigitalpianosandthensawitsrevenuesincrease.InordertoincreaseLargo’ssalesandinfactoutsellAllegro,weshouldintroducealineofdigitalpianosinavarietyofpriceranges.Ourdigitalpianoswouldbelikelytofindinstantacceptancewithcustomers,sincetheywouldbeassociatedwiththeprestigiousLargoname.”1，Theincreaseofrevenuemayjustcoincidedwiththesaleofinexpensivedigitalpianos,whilethetwoactuallyhadnocausalrealationship.2，ThestrategyusedinotherpanysmaynotbesuitfortheLargoPiano.3，Theexpectedinstantacceptancewithcustomersmaynotbethecase.Asthefacttheauthorcited,therevenueoftheLargoPianohavedeclinedduringthepastfiveyears,itmaynolongerowntheprestige.1，销售降低的原因?排除他因。2，错误类比3，是否会得到持续承受?销售连续下降也许已经说明show声誉的下降。1，A公司销售额上升的真实原因是否由于数字钢琴消费线的引入2，适用于A公司的不一定适用于L公司3，价格的变化将带来产品市场定位的变化，可能会损坏品牌形象GMAT作文范文及解析：公司鼓励机制ThefollowingappearedinamemorandumfromthedirectorofresearchanddevelopmentatReady-to-Ware,asoftwareengineeringfirm.“ThepackageofbenefitsandincentivesthatReady-to-Wareofferstoprofessionalstaffistoocostly.Ourquarterlyprofitshavedeclinedsincethepackagewasintroducedtwoyearsago,atthetimeofourincorporation.Moreover,thepackagehadlittlepositiveeffect,aswehavehadonlymarginalsuccessinrecruitingandtraininghigh-qualityprofessionalstaff.Tobeemoreprofitableagain,Ready-to-Wareshould,therefore,offerthereducedbenefitspackagethatwasinplacetwoyearsagoandusethesavingstofundourcurrentresearchanddevelopmentinitiatives.”一家软件工程公司，Ready-to-Ware的'研发经理的备忘录：RW给专业人员的利益和鼓励机制太昂贵了。自从两年前我们组成公司时机制引入，我们的利润下降了1/4，而且，这个机制根本上没有效果，因为我们在招募和训练高程度专业人员方面只获得边际(marginal?)成功。为了再次得到更多的利润，RW应该提供两年前使用的较低的鼓励机制，并把节余用于研发的开展。1，Thecausalrelationshipbetweenthebenefitpackagegiventotheprofessionalstaffandthedeclineoftheprofitisnotguaranteedbythecoincidencethatthelatteroccuredjustafterthelatter.Otherfactorsthatmaycontributetothedeclineintheprofitshouldalsobeconsideredandruledout.2，Researchanddevelopmentisatime-consumingprocess.Twoyearsisnotalongenoughperiodtoseetheresultandpositiveeffects.3，Evenifthepackageisreallytoohighandcausedthedeclneofprofit,itisstillimprudenttosaythatthereducedbenefitspackagethatwasinplacetwoyearsagowilldefinitelywork.1.同时发生并不代表因果，忽略他因2.没有提供信息，不知道假如不提供这些会不会得到成功培训3.即使是省下钱，也不知是否科研，因为可能因为其他原因导致的利润下降。Tobeginwith,thedirector’sreasoningisaclassicinstanceof“afterthis,thereforebecauseofthis”reasoning.Theonlyevidenceputforwardtosupporttheclaimthattheintroductionofthebenefitspackageisresponsibleforthedeclineinquarterlyprofitsisthattheprofitsdeclinedafterthepackagewasintroduced.However,thisevidenceisinsufficienttoestablishthecausalclaiminquestion.Manyotherfactorscouldbringaboutthesameresult.Forexle,thepanymayhavefailedtokeeppacewithpetitorsinintroducingnewproductsormayhavefailedtosatisfyitscustomersbyprovidingadequatesupportservices.Untiltheseandotherpossiblefactorsareruledout,itisprematuretoconcludethattheintroductionofthebenefitspackagewasthecauseofthedeclineinprofits.Next,thedirectorassumesthatthebenefitspackagecurrentlyofferedisresponsibleforthemarginalsuccessReady-to-Warehasexperiencedinrecruitingandtrainingnewhigh-qualityprofessionals.However,noevidenceisofferedtosupportthisallegation.OtherreasonsforReady-to-Ware’sfailuretoattracthigh-qualityprofessionalsarenotconsidered.Forexle,perhapsReady-to-Wareisnotacuttingedgepanyorisnotregard