版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
ASEANGuideon
AIGovernanceandEthics
Contents
ExecutiveSummary
03
D.National-levelRecommendations
A.Introduction
06
E.Regional-levelRecommendations
1.
Objectives
08
F.Conclusion
2.
Assumptions
08
3.
TargetAudience
09
AnnexA:AIRiskImpactAssessmentTemplate
4.
Definitions
09
AnnexB:UseCases
B.GuidingPrinciplesfortheFramework
10
1.
AboitizGroup
1.
TransparencyandExplainability
11
2.
EY
2.
FairnessandEquity
12
3.
Gojek
3.
SecurityandSafety
13
4.
UCARE.AI
4.
Human-centricity
14
5.
SmartNationGroup(SNG),Singapore
5.
PrivacyandDataGovernance
14
6.
MinistryofEducation,Singapore
6.
AccountabilityandIntegrity
15
7.
RobustnessandReliability
16
C.AIGovernanceFramework
17
1.
Internalgovernancestructuresandmeasures
18
2.
Determiningthelevelofhumaninvolvement
inAI-augmenteddecision-making
23
3.
Operationsmanagement
27
4.
Stakeholderinteractionandcommunication
41
46
53
58
60
73
74
76
78
80
83
85
ASEANGuideonAIGovernanceandEthics
ExecutiveSummary
WhattheGuideisabout
Thisdocumentservesasapracticalguidefororganisationsintheregionthatwishtodesign,develop,anddeploytraditionalAItechnologiesincommercialandnon-militaryordual-useapplications.ThisGuidefocusesonencouragingalignmentwithinASEANandfosteringtheinteroperabilityofAIframeworksacrossjurisdictions.Italsoincludesrecommendationsonnational-levelandregional-levelinitiativesthatgovernmentsintheregioncanconsiderimplementingtodesign,develop,anddeployAIsystemsresponsibly.
GuidingPrinciplesfortheFramework
Transparency
Fairnessand
Securityand
Robustnessand
and
Equity
Safety
Reliability
Explainability
Human-centricity
PrivacyandData
Accountability
Governance
andIntegrity
4KeyComponents
Internalgovernancestructuresandmeasures
Multi-disciplinary,centralgoverningbody,suchasanAIEthicsAdvisoryBoard,tooverseeAIgovernanceefforts
Developstandards,guidelines,tools,andtemplatestohelporganisationsdesign,develop,anddeployAIresponsibly
Clearlylayouttherolesandresponsibilitiesofpersonnelinvolvedintheresponsibledesign,developmentand/ordeploymentofAI
DeterminingthelevelofhumaninvolvementinAI-augmenteddecision-making
Conductrelevantriskimpactassessmentstodeterminelevelofrisk
Threebroadcategoriesofhumaninvolvementbasedonlevelofrisk–human-in-the-loop,human-over-the-loop,human-out-of-the-loop
MitigatingriskshelpsbuildtrusttowardstheacceptanceandgreateruseofAItechnologiesintheregion
3
ASEANGuideonAIGovernanceandEthics
Operationsmanagement
TheAISystemLifecycleconsistsofvariousstagesandisoftenaniterativeprocess
Conductrisk-basedassessmentsbeforestartinganydatacollectionandprocessingormodelling
Mitigaterisksofunjustbiasduetoinsufficientlyrepresentativetraining,testingandvalidationdatasets
Stakeholderinteractionandcommunication
Developtrustwithstakeholdersthroughoutthedesign,development,anddeploymentof
AI
ProvidegeneraldisclosureofwhenAIisusedinproductsand/orserviceofferings
PutinplacemeasurestohelpemployeesadapttoanAI-augmentedworkenvironment
National-levelRecommendations
NurturingAItalentandupskillingworkforce
Workcloselywithpublicandprivatesectorstoensurethatacountry’sworkforcecanadapttothenewwaysofworkingandpossessesenoughdigitalskillstointeracteffectivelywithAIsystems.
SupportingAIinnovationecosystemandpromotinginvestmentinAIstart-ups
WorkcloselywithpublicandprivatesectorstocreateasupportiveenvironmentforAIdevelopment,wherecompaniesareabletoaccessandleveragedata,digitaltechnologies,andinfrastructure.
InvestinginAIresearchanddevelopment
KeepabreastofthelatestdevelopmentsinAIandencourageresearchrelatedtothecybersecurityofAI,AIgovernance,andAIethicstoensurethatthesafetyandresiliencyofAIsystemsandtoolsalsoadvanceinparallelwithnewusecases.
PromotingadoptionofusefultoolsbybusinessestoimplementtheASEANGuideonAIGovernanceandEthics
DeploytoolstoenabletheimplementationofAIgovernanceinoperationsandensurethatdocumentationandvalidationprocessesaremoreefficient.
RaisingawarenessamongcitizensontheeffectsofAIinsociety
RaiseawarenessofthepotentialrisksandbenefitsofAIsocitizenscanmakeinformeddecisionsabouttheappropriateuseofAIandtakeappropriateactionstoprotectthemselvesfromharmfulusesofAIsystems.
4
ASEANGuideonAIGovernanceandEthics
Regional-levelrecommendations
SettingupanASEANWorkingGrouponAIGovernancetodriveandoverseeAIgovernanceinitiativesintheregion
TheWorkingGroupcanconsistofrepresentativesfromeachoftheASEANmemberstateswhocanworktogethertorollouttherecommendationslaidoutinthisGuide,aswellasprovideguidanceforASEANcountrieswhowishtoadoptcomponentsofthisGuide,andwhereappropriate,includeconsultationwithotherindustrypartnersfortheirviewsandinput.
AdaptationofthisGuidetoaddressgovernanceofgenerativeAI
Risksinclude:
Mistakesandanthropomorphism
Factuallyinaccurateresponsesanddisinformation
Deepfakes,impersonation,fraudulentandmaliciousactivities
Infringementofintellectualpropertyrights
Privacyandconfidentiality
Propagationofembeddedbiases
Governanceshouldinclude:
Adaptationofexistingframeworksandtools
Guidanceondevelopingasharedresponsibilityframework
GuidanceonincreasingthecapacitytomanagerisksofgenerativeAI
GuidanceonhowtodistinguishAI-generatedcontentversusauthenticallygeneratedones
CompilingacompendiumofusecasesdemonstratingpracticalimplementationoftheGuidebyorganisationsoperatinginASEAN
AcompendiumofusecasesshowcasesthecommitmentoftheseorganisationstoAIgovernanceandhelpsthempromotethemselvesasresponsibleAIpractitioners.
UseCases
IllustrationofcomponentsoftheASEANGuideonAIGovernanceandEthicsthroughusecasesoforganisationsoperatinginASEANthathaveimplementedAIgovernancemeasuresinAIdesign,development,anddeployment.
Gojek AboitizGroupSmartNationGroup(SNG),Singapore
UCARE.AI EYMinistryofEducation,Singapore
5
Introduction
ASEANGuideonAIGovernanceandEthics
A.Introduction
ArtificialIntelligence(AI)isthedisciplineofmakinganalyticalmachinesintelligent,enablinganorganisationtofunctionappropriatelyandwithforesight.Unlikeothertechnologies,someformsofAIadaptonitsown,learningthroughuse,sothedecisionsitmakestodaymaybedifferentfromthoseitmakestomorrow.AIandautomationhavebeenhottopics,bothfortheirtransformativepotentialandfortheircapacitytointroducenewopportunitiesbydisruptingoldmodels.SoutheastAsiaisnoexception.AIsystemsshouldbetreateddifferentlyfromothersoftwaresystemsbecauseofitsuniquecharacteristicsandrisks.CapabilitiesofAIsystemsfuelledbytechniquesevolutionandbreakthroughsarequicklyoutpacingthemonitoringandvalidationtools.ThedevelopmentofAIisalsodecentralisedduetolowbarrierstoentryandtheproliferationofopen-sourcetechnologies.GiventheprofoundimpactthatAIpotentiallybringstoorganisationsandindividualsinASEAN,itisimportantthatthedecisionsmadebyAIarealignedwithnationalandcorporatevalues,aswellasbroaderethicalandsocialnorms.
Also,theASEANDigitalMasterplan2025(ADM2025)developedbyASEANMemberStates(“AMS”)envisionsASEANasaleadingdigitalcommunityandeconomicbloc,poweredbysecureandtransformativedigitalservices,technologies,andecosystem.Inthatcontext,theADM2025hasidentifiedEnablingAction(EA)2.7thatsuggeststhedevelopmentandadoptionofaregionalpolicytodeliverbestpracticeguidanceonAIgovernanceandethics.Inrecentyears,governmentsandinternationalorganisationshavebegunissuingprinciples,frameworksandrecommendationsonAIethicsandgovernance.ExamplesincludeSingapore’sModelAIGovernanceFramework1andOECD’sRecommendationoftheCouncilonAI2.However,therehasnotyetbeenanintergovernmentalcommonstandardforAIthatdefinestheprinciplesofAIgovernanceandprovidesguidanceforpolicymakersintheregiontoutiliseAIsystemsinaresponsibleandethicalmanner.IntheprocessofdraftingthisGuide,existingAIgovernanceframeworksandguidelinessuchasUNESCO’sRecommendationontheEthicsofArtificialIntelligence3andEU’sEthicsGuidelinesforTrustworthyAIwerereferenced4.
TheASEANGuideonAIGovernanceandEthicsaimstoempowerorganisationsandgovernmentsintheregiontodesign,develop,anddeploytraditionalAIsystemsresponsiblyandincreaseusers’trustinAI.
InfocommMediaDevelopmentAuthority,“ModelArtificialIntelligenceGovernanceFrameworkSecondEdition”(21January2020)
<
.sg/-/media/files/pdpc/pdf-files/resource-for-organisation/ai/sgmodelaigovframework2.pdf
>
OrganisationforEconomicCo-operationandDevelopment,“RecommendationoftheCouncilonArtificialIntelligence”(22May2019)<
/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449
>
UnitedNationsEducational,ScientificandCulturalOrganisation,“RecommendationontheEthicsofArtificialIntelligence”(23November2021)
/ark:/48223/pf0000381137
>
EuropeanCommission“EthicsGuidelinesforTrustworthyAI”<
https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai
>(8April2019)
7
ASEANGuideonAIGovernanceandEthics
1.Objectives
Thisdocumentservesasapracticalguidefororganisationsintheregionthatwishtodesign,develop,anddeploytraditionalAItechnologiesincommercialandnon-militaryordual-useapplications.ThisGuidefocusesonencouragingalignmentwithinASEANandfosteringtheinteroperabilityofAIframeworksacrossjurisdictions.Italsoincludesrecommendationsonnational-levelandregional-levelinitiativesthatgovernmentsintheregioncanconsiderimplementingtodesign,develop,anddeployAIsystemsresponsibly.
TheASEANGuideonAIGovernanceandEthicsencompassesabroadrangeofconsiderationsthatneedstobetailoredtotheorganisationsdesigning,developing,anddeployingAIdependingonthenatureoftheindustry,complexityofthetechnology,andassociatedrisksoftheAIsystems.LocalgovernmentauthoritiesareencouragedtorefertothisGuidewhenformulatingtheirpoliciesandapproaches.
Whileadoptionoftheframeworklaidouthereinisvoluntary,thisGuidecanhelporganisationsbuildtrustamongstakeholdersandthepublicaswellasaligntheirAIpracticeswithinternationalstandardsandbestpractices,amongothers.OrganisationsareencouragedtorefertotheguidelinesinthisdocumenttounderstandhowtoassesstherisksassociatedwithAIandtakemeasurestodesign,develop,anddeployAIresponsiblyinthecontextoftheirorganisations.
ThisGuideismeanttobealivingdocumentthatshouldbeperiodicallyreviewedandassessedbyrelevantASEANsectorialbodies,inconsultationwithindustrypartners,toensurethatitisuptodatewiththelatestregulationsandadvancementsintheAIspace.UpdatestothisGuidemaybepublishedsubsequentlytokeepupwithevolutionsandgrowthingovernanceandstandards.
2.Assumptions
AIsystemsneedtobemanagedholistically,includingitsecosystemandallcomponents–humanoperator,InternetofThings(IoT),robotics,traditionaltechnology,vendors,etc.InadditiontotherecommendationssetoutinthisGuidepertainingtoAIgovernance,organisationsarealsoencouragedtofollowandrefertointernationalstandardsandbestpracticesinrelatedfieldslikeinformationsecuritymanagementsystems(ISMS),datamanagementandgovernance,softwaredevelopmentandtesting,cybersecurity,IoT,etc.
Developersanddeployersneedtoadheretoapplicablenationallawsandregulations,includingsector-specificlawsandconstitutionswhendesigning,developing,anddeployingAItechnologies.TheASEANGuideonAIGovernanceandEthicsdoesnotreplaceorsupersedeanyexistingorupcominglawsandonlyservesasaguideforresponsibledesign,development,anddeploymentofAIintheregion.BeforedeployingAI,itisalsoimportantfordevelopersanddeployerstoconsidertherelevantlegalandregulatoryrequirementsoftherespectivecountrieswheretheAIsystemswillbedeployed,aswellastheusecontextforlegal,policy,andregulatoryconcerns.
Giventhefast-evolvingspaceofAI,developersanddeployersofAIsystemsshouldbemindfulofthelateststateoftheartvis-à-visgovernancetoolsandtechnologiesandconducttherelevantassessmentstoevaluatethefeasibilityandusefulnessofthesetoolsintheimplementationofAIgovernancepracticesinthedesign,development,anddeploymentofAIsystems.
8
ASEANGuideonAIGovernanceandEthics
3.TargetAudience
TheASEANGuideonAIGovernanceandEthicsisanASEAN-endorsedframeworkfororganisationsintheregiontorefertowhendesigning,developing,anddeployingtraditionalAItechnologies.Itprovidesguidelinesandrecommendationsforadiverserangeofindividualsandorganisationsalongtheentirevaluechain.TheseincludeAIdevelopersanddeployers,academicprofessionals,andeveryonethatisinterestedinutilisingorscalingupAIsystems.TheGuidealsoincludessectionsonnational-levelandregional-levelrecommendationsthataremoretargetedtowardspolicymakersinASEAN.
4.Definitions
ThedefinitionsofseveralkeytermsusedinthisGuidearesetoutbelow.
ASEAN:referstotheAssociationofSoutheastAsianNations.Itisapoliticalandeconomicunionof10memberstatesinSoutheastAsia,whichpromotesintergovernmentalcooperationandfacilitateseconomic,political,security,military,educational,andsocioculturalintegrationbetweenitsmembersandcountriesintheAsia-Pacific.
ArtificialIntelligence(AI):isanengineeredormachine-basedsystemthatcan,foragivensetofobjectives,generateoutputssuchaspredictions,recommendations,ordecisionsinfluencingrealorvirtualenvironments.
AIsystem:isamachine-basedsystemthatiscapableofinfluencingtheenvironmentbyproducinganoutput(predictions,recommendationsordecisions)foragivensetofobjectives.Itusesmachineand/orhuman-baseddataandinputsto(i)perceiverealand/orvirtualenvironments;(ii)abstracttheseperceptionsintomodelsthroughanalysisinanautomatedmanner(e.g.,withmachinelearning),ormanually;and(iii)usemodelinferencetoformulateoptionsforoutcomes.AIsystemsaredesignedtooperatewithvaryinglevelsofautonomy.
DeepLearning:isasubsetofmachinelearning.Itisverylooselybasedontheinformation-processingarchitectureofthebrain–albeitfarfrommatchingitsability–enablingsystemstofindwaysofre-representinginputdatathatfacilitatemakinghighlyaccuratepredictions.
Deployer:isanentitythatusesorimplementsanAIsystem,whichcouldeitherbedevelopedbytheirin-houseteamorviaathird-partydeveloper.
Developer:isanentitythatdesigns,codes,orproducesanAIsystem.
MachineLearning:isasubfieldinAIwherealgorithmslearnbyidentifyingpatternsandcorrelationswithindatausingstatisticaltechniquestoenhanceperformance,allwithoutbeingexplicitlyprogrammed.
User:isanentityorperson(internalorexternal)thatinteractswithanAIsystemoranAI-enabledserviceandcanbeaffectedbyitsdecisions.
9
GuidingPrinciplesfortheFramework
ASEANGuideonAIGovernanceandEthics
B.GuidingPrinciplesfortheFramework
ThesevenguidingprinciplesbelowhelptoensuretrustinAIandthedesign,development,anddeploymentofethicalAIsystems.TheyalsoprovideguidanceonhowAIsystemsshouldbedesigned,developed,anddeployedinwayswhichconsiderthebroadersocietalimpact.
1.TransparencyandExplainability
TransparencyreferstoprovidingdisclosureonwhenanAIsystemisbeingusedandtheinvolvementofanAIsystemindecision-making,whatkindofdataituses,anditspurpose.BydisclosingtoindividualsthatAIisusedinthesystem,individualswillbecomeawareandcanmakeaninformedchoiceofwhethertousetheAI-enabledsystem.
ExplainabilityistheabilitytocommunicatethereasoningbehindanAIsystem’sdecisioninawaythatisunderstandabletoarangeofpeople,asitisnotalwaysclearhowanAIsystemhasarrivedataconclusion.ThisallowsindividualstoknowthefactorscontributingtotheAIsystem’srecommendation.
InordertobuildpublictrustinAI,itisimportanttoensurethatusersareawareoftheuseofAItechnologyandunderstandhowinformationfromtheirinteractionisusedandhowtheAIsystemmakesitsdecisionsusingtheinformationprovided.
Inlinewiththeprincipleoftransparency,deployershavearesponsibilitytoclearlydisclosetheimplementationofanAIsystemtostakeholdersandfostergeneralawarenessoftheAIsystembeingused.WiththeincreasinguseofAIinmanybusinessesandindustries,thepublicisbecomingmoreawareandinterestedinknowingwhentheyareinteractingwithAIsystems.KnowingwhenandhowAIsystemsinteractwithusersisalsoimportantinhelpingusersdiscernthepotentialharmofinteractingwithanAIsystemthatisnotbehavingasintended.Inthepast,AIalgorithmshavebeenfoundtodiscriminateagainstfemalejobapplicantsandhavefailedtoaccuratelyrecognisethefacesofdark-skinnedwomen.ItisimportantforuserstobeawareoftheexpectedbehaviouroftheAIsystemssotheycanmakemoreinformeddecisionsaboutthepotentialharmofinteractingwithAIsystems.AnexampleoftransparencyinanAI-enabledecommerceplatformisinformingusersthattheirpurchasehistoryisusedbytheplatform’srecommendationalgorithmtoidentifysimilarproductsanddisplaythemontheusers’feeds.
Inlinewiththeprincipleofexplainability,developersanddeployersdesigning,developing,anddeployingAIsystemsshouldalsostrivetofostergeneralunderstandingamongusersofhowsuchsystemsworkwithsimpleandeasytounderstandexplanationsonhowtheAIsystemmakesdecisions.UnderstandinghowAIsystemsworkwillhelphumansknowwhentotrustitsdecisions.Explanationscanhavevaryingdegreesofcomplexity,rangingfromasimpletextexplanationofwhichfactorsmoresignificantlyaffectedthedecision-makingprocesstodisplayingaheatmapovertherelevanttextorontheareaofanimagethatledtothesystem’sdecision.Forexample,whenanAIsystemisusedtopredictthelikelihoodofcardiacarrestinpatients,explainabilitycanbeimplementedbyinformingmedicalprofessionalsofthemostsignificantfactors(e.g.,age,bloodpressure,etc.)thatinfluencedtheAIsystem’sdecisionsothattheycansubsequentlymakeinformeddecisionsontheirown.
Where“blackbox”modelsaredeployed,renderingitdifficult,ifnotimpossibletoprovideexplanationsastotheworkingsoftheAIsystem,outcome-basedexplanations,withafocusonexplainingtheimpactofdecision-makingorresultsflowingfromtheAIsystemmaybereliedon.
11
ASEANGuideonAIGovernanceandEthics
Alternatively,deployersmayalsoconsiderfocusingonaspectsrelatingtothequalityoftheAIsystemorpreparinginformationthatcouldbuilduserconfidenceintheoutcomesofanAIsystem’sprocessingbehaviour.Someofthesemeasuresare:
DocumentingtherepeatabilityofresultsproducedbytheAIsystem.SomepracticestodemonstraterepeatabilityincludeconductingrepeatabilityassessmentstoensuredeploymentsinliveenvironmentsarerepeatableandperformingcounterfactualfairnesstestingtoensurethattheAIsystem’sdecisionsarethesameinboththerealworldandinthecounterfactualworld.Repeatabilityreferstotheabilityofthesystemtoconsistentlyobtainthesameresults,giventhesamescenario.Repeatabilityoftenapplieswithinthesameenvironment,withthesamedataandthesamecomputationalconditions.
EnsuringtraceabilitybybuildinganaudittrailtodocumenttheAIsystemdevelopmentanddecision-makingprocess,implementingablackboxrecorderthatcapturesallinputdatastreams,orstoringdataappropriatelytoavoiddegradationandalteration.
Facilitatingauditabilitybykeepingacomprehensiverecordofdataprovenance,procurement,pre-processing,lineage,storage,andsecurity.Suchinformationcanalsobecentraliseddigitallyinaprocesslogtoincreasecapacitytocaterthepresentationofresultstodifferenttiersofstakeholderswithdifferentinterestsandlevelsofexpertise.Deployersshould,however,notethatauditabilitydoesnotnecessarilyentailmakingcertainconfidentialinformationaboutbusinessmodelsorintellectualpropertyrelatedtotheAIsystempubliclyavailable.Arisk-basedapproachcanbetakentowardsidentifyingthesubsetofAI-enabledfeaturesintheAIsystemforwhichimplementedauditabilityisnecessarytoalignwithregulatoryrequirementsorindustrypractices.
UsingAIModelCards,whichareshortdocumentsaccompanyingtrainedmachinelearningmodelsthatdisclosethecontextinwhichmodelsareintendedtobeused,detailsoftheperformanceevaluationprocedures,andotherrelevantinformation.
IncaseswhereAIsystemsareprocureddirectlyfromdevelopers,deployerswillhavetoworktogetherwiththesedeveloperstoachievetransparency.MoreonthiswillbecoveredinlatersectionsoftheGuide.
2.FairnessandEquity
Deployersshouldhavesafeguardsinplacetoensurethatalgorithmicdecisionsdonotfurtherexacerbateoramplifyexistingdiscriminatoryorunjustimpactsacrossdifferentdemographicsandthedesign,development,anddeploymentofAIsystemsshouldnotresultinunfairbiasnessordiscrimination.Anexampleofsuchsafeguardswouldincludehumaninterventionsandchecksonthealgorithmsanditsoutputs.DeployersofAIsystemsshouldconductregulartestingofsuchsystemstoconfirmifthereisbiasandwherebiasisconfirmed,makethenecessaryadjustmentstorectifyimbalancestoensureequity.
WiththerapiddevelopmentsintheAIspace,AIsystemsareincreasinglyusedtoaiddecision-making.Forexample,AIsystemsarecurrentlyusedtoscreenresumesinjobapplicationprocesses,predictthecreditworthinessofconsumersandprovideagronomicadvicetofarmers.Ifnotproperlymanaged,anAIsystem’soutputsusedtomakedecisionswithsignificantimpactonindividualscouldperpetuateexistingdiscriminatoryorunjustimpactstospecificdemographics.Tomitigatediscrimination,itisimportantthatthedesign,development,anddeploymentofAIsystemsalignwithfairnessandequityprinciples.Inaddition,thedatasetsusedtotraintheAIsystemsshouldbediverseandrepresentative.Appropriatemeasuresshouldbetakentomitigatepotentialbiasesduringdatacollectionandpre-processing,training,andinference.Forexample,the
12
ASEANGuideonAIGovernanceandEthics
trainingandtestdatasetforanAIsystemusedintheeducationsectorshouldbeadequatelyrepresentativeofthestudentpopulationbyincludingstudentsofdifferentgendersandethnicities.
3.SecurityandSafety
AIsystemsshouldbesafeandsufficientlysecureagainstmaliciousattacks.
Safetyreferstoensuringthesafetyofdevelopers,deployers,andusersofAIsystemsbyconductingimpactorriskassessmentsandensuringthatknownriskshavebeenidentifiedandmitigated.Ariskpreventionapproachshouldbeadopted,andprecautionsshouldbeputinplacesothathumanscanintervenetopreventharm,orthesystemcansafelydisengageitselfintheeventanAIsystemmakesunsafedecisions-autonomousvehiclesthatcauseinjurytopedestriansareanillustrationofthis.EnsuringthatAIsystemsaresafeisessentialtofosteringpublictrustinAI.SafetyofthepublicandtheusersofAIsystemsshouldbeofutmostpriorityinthedecision-makingprocessofAIsystemsandrisksshouldbeassessedandmitigatedtothebestextentpossible.BeforedeployingAIsystems,deployersshouldconductriskassessmentsandrelevanttestingorcertificationandimplementtheappropriatelevelofhumaninterventiontopreventharmwhenunsafedecisionstakeplace.Therisks,limitations,andsafeguardsoftheuseofAIshouldbemadeknowntotheuser.Forexample,inAI-enabledautonomousvehicles,developersanddeployersshouldputinplacemechanismsforthehumandrivertoeasilyresumemanualdrivingwhenevertheywish.
SecurityreferstoensuringthecybersecurityofAIsystems,whichincludesmechanismsagainstmaliciousattacksspecifictoAIsuchasdatapoisoning,modelinversion,thetamperingofdatasets,byzantineattacksinfederatedlearning5,aswellasotherattacksdesignedtoreverseengineerpersonaldatausedtotraintheAI.DeployersofAIsystemsshouldworkwithdeveloperstoputinplacetechnicalsecuritymeasureslikerobustauthenticationmechanismsandencryption.Justlikeanyothersoftware,deployersshouldalsoimplementsafeguardstoprotectAIsystemsagainstcyberattacks,datasecurityattacks,andotherdigitalsecurityrisks.ThesemayincludeensuringregularsoftwareupdatestoAIsystemsandproperaccessmanagementforcriticalorsensitivesystems.DeployersshouldalsodevelopincidentresponseplanstosafeguardAIsystemsfromtheaboveattacks.
Itisalsoimportantfordeployerstomakeaminimumlistofsecuritytesting(e.g.vulnerabilityassessmentandpenetrationtesting)andotherapplicablesecuritytestingtools.Someotherimportantconsiderationsalsoinclude:
Businesscontinuityplan
Disasterrecoveryplan
Zero-dayattacks
IoTdevices
Abyzantineattackinfederatedlearningisatypeofmaliciousactwhereoneormoreofthedevicesorserversinvolvedinthefederatedlearningprocessbehaveserraticallyorprovidesmisleadingupdatestothecentralmodel,withtheintenttocorruptormanipulatethelearningprocessoroutcomes.
13
ASEANGuideonAIGovernanceandEthics
4.Human-centricity
AIsystemsshouldrespecthuman-centredvaluesandpursuebenefitsforhumansociety,includinghumanbeings’well-being,nutrition,happiness,etc.
ItiskeytoensurethatpeoplebenefitfromAIdesign,development,anddeploym
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 高水平校本教研的目标导向与实践路径
- 麦肯锡-2026 年非洲消费者现状:读懂务实型购物者 State of Consumer Africa 2026 Meeting the pragmatic shopper
- 《ICP增高的护理》课件
- 《烯烃的氧化反应》课件
- 银行柜员年终总结资料16篇
- 全科医学中的医患关系与沟通202
- 银行年终个人总结13篇
- 2026公路水运工程试验检测工程师考试隧道
- 化学竞赛无机化学绝密课件氢和稀有气体
- 2026年胸外科中专模拟试题及答案详解
- T/CMSGS 001-2025低空无人驾驶航空器起降点气象观测设施建设和维护要求
- 2026年小学英语学科专业知识(含新课标核心素养)测试卷含答案(三套)
- DB37T5312-2025 建筑施工安全防护设施技术标准
- 供热运维管理合同模板(3篇)
- CESA-2024《整机柜服务器用电源模块规范》
- 日本介绍课件
- 感染性伤口的处理原则
- 供应室岗前培训
- 行政应诉实务培训课件
- 2025压力容器设计质量控制程序文件
- 【教师版】表格式审题立意小纸条
评论
0/150
提交评论