版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
中英思维方式差异对商务谈判的影响及对策Ⅰ摘要在全球化的趋势下,国际间的商务谈判已成为谈判者必须面对的事实。然而,许多进行商务谈判的中方人员总会有这样一种感慨,那就是,在商务谈判过程中,谈判双方虽然都抱有诚意,但最终还是不能取得很理想的结果,大部分中方的商务谈判人员都感到与英方商务谈判人员进行谈判时很难知道对方究竟是什么意图,究其原因是在商务谈判中缺乏对彼此不同的思维模式的了解,而谈判者的言语行为受其思维模式的影响又非常明显。思维方式决定着行动的结果,中国人注重综合型思维方式,而英国人注重分析型思维方式。为了更好的促进中英商务合作,必须深入了解两种文化的差异,在谈判时更好地掌控谈判进程。中英两种不同的文化、不同的社会背景产生了两种不同的思维方式,主要表现在闭环思维和线性思维、整体性思维和分析性思维、感性思维和理性思维等三个方面。本文从分析中英思维方式差异入手,通过对比中英思维方式的差异及其对商务谈判的影响,阐述了在商务谈判过程中存在的中英思维方式差异,进而提出中英思维方式在商务谈判中的对策。关键词:中英思维差异;商务谈判;影响;对策ⅡABSTRACTUnderthetrendofglobalization,internationalbusinessnegotiationhasbecomeafactthatnegotiatorsmustface.However,manyChinesebusinessnegotiatorsalwayshaveafeelingthat,intheprocessofbusinessnegotiations,althoughbothsidesaresincere,theystillcannotachieveaveryidealresult.MostChinesebusinessnegotiatorsfeelthatitisdifficulttoknowwhattheotherside'sintentioniswhennegotiatingwithBritishbusinessnegotiators.Thereasonisthelackofunderstandingofdifferentthinkingmodesinbusinessnegotiations,andthenegotiators'speechbehaviorisobviouslyinfluencedbytheirthinkingmodes.Thinkingmodedeterminestheresultofaction.Chinesepeoplepayattentiontocomprehensivethinkingmode,whileBritishpeoplepayattentiontoanalyticalthinkingmode.InordertobetterpromoteChina-UKbusinesscooperation,itisnecessarytohaveadeepunderstandingofthedifferencesbetweenthetwoculturesandbettercontrolthenegotiationprocessduringthenegotiation.DifferentculturesandsocialbackgroundsinChinaandBritainhaveproducedtwodifferentwaysofthinking,whicharemainlymanifestedinthreeaspects:closed-loopthinkingvslinearthinking,holisticthinkingvsanalyticalthinking,perceptualthinkingvsrationalthinking.ThispaperstartswiththeanalysisofthedifferencesbetweenChineseandBritishwaysofthinking,andexpoundsthedifferencesbetweenChineseandBritishwaysofthinkingintheprocessofbusinessnegotiationbycomparingthedifferencesbetweenChineseandBritishwaysofthinkingandtheirinfluenceonbusinessnegotiation,andthenputsforwardthecountermeasuresofChineseandBritishwaysofthinkinginbusinessnegotiation.Keywords:Differences
in
Chinese
and
British
Thinking;BusinessNegotiation;Influence;Countermeasure ⅢTableofContentsChapterOneIntroduction…………..……………….……...….1ChapterTwoTheDifferencesBetweenChineseandBritishWaysofThinking………42.1Closed-LoopThinkingVSLinearThinking……..…..…42.2HolisticThinkingVSAnalyticalThinking…….…….42.3EmotionalThinkingVSRationalThinking…….……………...………..5ChapterThreeTheInfluenceofDifferentThinkingModesBetweenChinaandBritainonBusinessNegotiation……..………………...…………...…63.1TheInfluenceonNegotiatingObjectives……………..…….………63.1.1TheInfluenceontheHighestandLowestGoals…………..…….……...………63.1.2TheInfluenceonActualDemandTargets…...……..………73.1.3TheInfluenceonAcceptableGoals……...……73.2TheInfluenceontheNegotiationProcess………………...…………….………….…73.2.1TheInfluenceontheOpeningPhase…………...…………...……………….…….83.2.2TheInfluenceontheQuotationStage…………..…..……….……83.2.3TheInfluenceontheConsultationPhase……………..….…………….…….…83.2.4TheInfluenceontheTransactionStage……………..……….……..……...……..….93.3TheInfluenceonNegotiatingStyle………….……...……….……..…...9ChapterFourTheCountermeasuresoftheDifferencesBetweenChineseandBritishModesofThinkinginBusinessNegotiation….……………….…..………...……...……104.1UnderstandingandRespectingtheCausesoftheDifferencesBetweenChineseandBritishWaysofThinking………………..……….…………….…...…………...…….…..….104.2CultivatingSensitivitytoDifferencesBetweenChineseandBritishWaysofThinking114.3ReconcilingDifferencesinChineseandBritishWaysofThinking…..…………12ChapterFiveConclusion…….……….…..…...13Bibliography……………………..…………..………………14Acknowledgements…………………..………..……….………15保定理工学院本科毕业论文ChapterOneIntroductionOntheonehand,humanthinkingisthefunctionofthehumanbraindevelopedtotheadvancedstageundertheactionofproductionpractice,anditistheproductofthelong-termdevelopmentofhumanhistory.Acountrycondensesitslong-heldunderstandingofrealityintoexperienceandhabits,formsthoughtswiththehelpoflanguage,andencodesthoughtsincertainways,thusformingitsuniquemodeofthinking.Ontheotherhand,differencesinthinkingmodesarecloselyrelatedtobusinessnegotiations.Differentthinkingmodesmayleadtodifferentnegotiationresults.Therefore,inordertostudytheinfluenceofthedifferencesinChineseandBritishwaysofthinkingonbusinessnegotiationsandcountermeasures,itisnecessarytohaveanin-depthunderstandingofthereasonsforthedifferencesinChineseandBritishwaysofthinkingandmakecorrespondingcountermeasures.Underthetideofeconomicglobalization,economicexchangesbetweencountriesarebecomingmorefrequentandextensive.Inrecentyears,China'seconomyhasbeendevelopingbetterandbetter.ForChineseenterprises,Chinawillstillbeacountryfullofopportunitiesandapromisingfuture.AftertheCOVID-19outbreak,Chinawillfacecompetitionfromallovertheworld,andthesuccessofbusinessnegotiationsisthepremiseofafirm"foothold"intheinternationalmarket.However,differentcountrieshavedifferentwaysofthinking,whichwillalsohaveacertaininfluenceonbusinessnegotiations.ThedifferentculturalenvironmentandsocialbackgroundbetweenChinaandtheUKdirectlyleadtothedifferentwaysofthinkingbetweenChinaandtheUK.Britainadvocatesindependence,freedomandequality,likestoexplore,andhasanoutgoingculture.Ontheotherhand,Chinaadvocatesself-sufficiency,modesty,comity,stabilityandtranquility,andhasaconservativeculture.TheBritishwayofthinkingmainlyemphasizesindividualinterestsandstartsfromindividualneeds;TheChinesewayofthinkingmainlyemphasizesthecollectiveinterest,everythingfromthecollectiveinterest,patriotismandcollectivespirit,andthenindividualinterest.Intheprocessofinternationalbusinesscommunication,businessnegotiationisoneoftheindispensablesteps.Howtousethewayofthinkingforeffectivecommunicationhasbecomeabigproblem.Therefore,understandingthedifferencesbetweenChineseandBritishwaysofthinkinghasbecomeacompulsorycourseinbusinessnegotiations.Researchsignificanceisdividedintothefollowingpoints:First,itcanhelppeoplerecognizethedifferencesbetweenChineseandBritishwaysofthinkinginbusinessnegotiations.Differentwaysofthinkingwillleadtodifferentnegotiationresultsinbusinessnegotiations.ThereisnodoubtthatreconcilingChineseandBritishwaysofthinkingismoreconducivetothesuccessofnegotiations.Second,itisnecessarytoclarifytheinfluenceofdifferencesinChineseandBritishwaysofthinkingonbusinessnegotiations,includingnegotiationobjectives,processandstyle,soastohelppeopleconductnegotiationsmoresmoothlyandpromotethesuccessofnegotiations.Thirdly,thepaperputsforwardcountermeasuresinbusinessnegotiationaimingatthedifferencesbetweenChineseandBritishwaysofthinking.OnlybyunderstandingthedifferencesbetweenChineseandBritishwaysofthinkingcanweputforwardcorrespondingcountermeasures,respectandharmonizethedifferencesbetweenChineseandBritishwaysofthinking,soastopromoteagooddevelopmenttrendofthenegotiationandachievesuccess.Thewayofthinkingistheangle,wayandmethodoflookingatthings,whichplaysadecisiveroleinpeople'swordsanddeeds.Modeofthinkingisimmaterialandmaterialisticonthesurface.Asthesayinggoes,"Whenthereisnothing,thereisnothing."Thiskindofinteractionbetweenimmaterialityandmaterialitycanconstitutethecontradictorymovementoftheevolutionanddevelopmentofthinkingmode.Peopleofdifferentnationalitiesandculturalbackgroundsviewthingsfromdifferentanglesandways,whichisthedifferenceinthewayofthinking.DomesticscholarshavemademanyresearchesontheinfluenceandcountermeasuresofthedifferencesinChineseandBritishwaysofthinkingonbusinessnegotiations.ChenYuanfei(2007),inthethirdchapterofAComparativeStudyofChineseandEnglishComplimentsinBusinessNegotiations,pointedoutthatoneofthereasonsfortherelativelyscatteredgoalsofChinesecomplimentsisthedifferencebetweencircularthinkingmodeandlinearthinkingmode.WangWeidong(2009)proposedinTheAnalysisoftheInfluenceofCulturalDifferencesontheThinkingModeofBusinessNegotiatorsthatthedifferencesbetweenChineseandWesternwaysofthinkingareduetoChineseandWesterndifferentculturesandputforwardcorrespondingcountermeasures.DongZhaofeng(2017)explainedHumboldt'sLinguisticWorldviewandSapirWhorf'sAssumptioninABriefAnalysisoftheDifferencesBetweenChineseandEnglishWaysofThinkingandTheirEmbodimentinLanguageLevel,andcomparedthethinkinglevelbetweenChineseandEnglish.WangJiao(2019)proposedinOntheInfluenceofDifferencesinChineseandWesternWaysofThinkingonInterpretingPracticeofBusinessNegotiationthatHanpeopleemphasizeharmonyintheirwayofthinkingandChinesepeopleemphasizeethicswhileWesternersemphasizecognition,thusclarifyingthedifferencesbetweenChineseandWesternwaysofthinking.However,ChineseandBritishwaysofthinkinghavelittleinfluenceonbusinessnegotiation.ForeignscholarPanYZ(2007)proposedinTheInfluenceofCulturalDifferenceonBusinessNegotiationthattodecreaseconflictanddefenseone'sownright,wemustgrasptheculturaldifferencebetweentheparticipants,beawareofthenegotiationstylesofthediversenegotiators.Butthedifferencesinmindsetarenottakenintoaccount.Basedontheaboveviews,thispaperidentifiestheinfluenceofthedifferencesinChineseandBritishwaysofthinkingonbusinessnegotiationsandputsforwardcountermeasures.
ChapterTwoTheDifferencesBetweenChineseandBritishWaysofThinkingThinkingreferstothegeneralandindirectreflectionofhumanbraintoobjectivethings,anditistheactivityofthinkingsubjecttoprocessinformationandconsciousness.Thinkingismanifestedinpeople'scognition,evaluationandsummaryofobjectivethingsthroughlanguage.Duetodifferencesinpeople'sculturalbackground,nationalpsychologyandsocialandeconomicdevelopmentmode,thereareobviousdifferencesinthewayofthinkingindifferentcountries.2.1Closed-LoopThinkingVSLinearThinkingClosed-loopthinkingmeansthatotherpeopleinitiateathing,andwithinacertainperiodoftime,nomatterhowwecompletetheeffect,weshouldtimelyandseriouslyfeedbacktotheinitiator,whichiscalledclosed-loopthinking.Closed-loopthinkingisthe"PDCAcycle"proposedbyDr.Hughart,anAmericanqualitymanagementexpert,namelyPlan,Do,Check,Act.Thesefourprocessesdonotendatonce,butinacycle.Linearthinkingisastraightline,one-waywayofthinking,thinkingalongacertainlinearorcurvedtracktoseeksolutionstoproblems.Linearthinkingisdividedintopositivelinearthinkingandreverselinearthinking.Thecharacteristicofpositivelinearthinkingisthatthinkingstartsfromacertainpoint,expandsalongthepositivepath,goesthroughoneorseveralpoints,andfinallyreachesthecorrectresultofthinkingandfinallygetsthecorrectanswer.Thecharacteristicofbackwardlinearthinkingisthatthethinkingstartsfromacertainpoint,butifitexpandsalongthepositivepath,nomatterhowmanypointsitgoesthrough,itisdifficulttoreachthecorrectresultofthinking.Sinceyoucan'tgoforward,youhavetothinkintheoppositedirection,throughaorafewpoints,soastofinallygettherightthinkingresults,gettherightanswer.MostChinesepeoplehaveclosed-loopthinking.Theyareusedtocognitionthingsasaclosedwholeandpayattentiontoinductionandoverallcognition.Intermsoflanguageexpression,Iwillgiveprioritytotheexternalatmosphereandthenexplainthekeypoints.ThemajorityofBritishpeoplehavelinearthinking,payattentiontodeductivereasoning.Theirlanguageisoftenstraightforward--statingthemainideafirstandthenextendingitinastraightline.SomanylongsentencesinEnglishareoftennestedinthesentence,intertwined,compactstructure.2.2HolisticThinkingVSAnalyticalThinkingHolisticthinking,alsoknownassystematicthinking,meanstounderstandthingsinacomprehensive,systematicandobjectivewayinaccordancewiththecomprehensive,systematicandobjectiverequirements.Itoftenintegratestheexistingunderstandingofvariousparts,aspects,characteristicsandfactorsoftheobject,andthenformsaunifiedoverallunderstandingoftheobject.Analyticalthinkingisathinkingmodethatcomestoadefiniteconclusionaftercarefulstudyandgradualanalysis.Itisathinkingmodefromparttowhole.Itusuallystartsfromexperiencetoachievetheunderstandingofthewhole,andanalyzesthewholeofanobjectiveobjectintovariousparts,aspects,characteristicsandfactorstobeunderstoodseparately.MostChinesepeoplehaveholisticthinking,liketo"startfromtheoverallsituation","lookattheoverallsituation","takeintoaccounttheoverallsituation"andsoon.Chinesepeopleareusedtoemphasizingthewholenessandsystematizationofthings.AsscholarLiuYangsaid,"TheHanpeopleseekcompleteness,perfection,harmony,symmetryandbalanceintheirthinking,emphasizingpersonalfeelingand'understanding',aswellaspsychologicalspace-timeandtimesequence."[9]46Ontheotherhand,Britishpeopletendtohaveanalyticalthinkingandaregoodatsimplifyingcomplexthingsand"dividing"things,asthescholarLiuYangsaid,"ThephilosophyoftheEnglishnationadvocates'separationofcharacters'.ThethinkingoftheEnglishnationemphasizesformalargumentation,advocatesindividualthinking,andholdsthatthewholecanonlyexistintheoppositionofindividuals."[9]462.3EmotionalThinkingVSRationalThinkingTheso-calledperceptualthinkingisakindofthinkingmode,whichisthecooperativecognitionofbranchcognition,thedefinitionandunderstandingoftheexistenceofthings,theattentiontothespecificstateofthings,andtheuseofconcretethingstoexpressabstractconcepts.Rationalthinkingisakindofthinkingwithclearthinkingdirectionandsufficientthinkingbasis,whichcanobserve,compare,analyze,synthesize,abstractandsummarizethingsorproblems.Chinesepeoplearegoodatusingperceptualthinking.InthefivethousandyearsofChinesehistory,theyhaveformedathinkingpatternthatexpressesconceptsinconcreteformsandlikesanalogicalreasoning,insteadofabstractthinkingthatattacheslittleimportancetopuremeaning.However,Britishpeoplearebetteratexpressingconcretethingswithabstractconceptsandattachmoreimportancetoabstractthinking.AsscholarWangWeidongsaid,"Westernabstractthinkingmode,emphasisonconceptualanalysis,logicalreasoning.Itemphasizesfactsthathavenovaluewhatsoever."ItcanbeseenthatChinesepeopleregainunderstandingandmakegooduseofimagethinking,theBritishattachimportancetoreasonandmakegooduseoflogicalthinking.ChapterThreeTheInfluenceofDifferentThinkingModesBetweenChinaandBritainonBusinessNegotiationAsscholarWangWeidongsaid:"Languageisthemosteffectivetoolofthinking.Thinkingactivitiesneedtobecarriedoutwiththehelpoflanguage,andtheresultsofthinkingalsoneedtorelyonlanguagetoexpress."Inbusinessnegotiations,inappropriatelanguageduetodifferencesinwaysofthinkingmaygreatlyaffectthefinalresultofthenegotiation.TheinfluenceofthedifferencesinChineseandBritishwaysofthinkingonbusinessnegotiationscanberoughlydividedintothreeparts:theinfluenceonthenegotiationobjectives,theinfluenceonthenegotiationprocessandtheinfluenceonthenegotiationstyle.3.1TheInfluenceonNegotiatingObjectivesInternationalbusinessnegotiationisaplanned,targetedandorganizedeconomicactivity,whiletheobjectiveofnegotiationreferstothesubstantiveissuestobesolvedintheprocessofnegotiation,whichisboththestartingpointandthefocalpointofnegotiation.AccordingtotheinfluenceofdifferencesinChineseandBritishwaysofthinkingonnegotiationobjectives,itcanbesubdividedintotheinfluenceonthehighestandlowestobjectives,theinfluenceontheactualdemandobjectives,andtheinfluenceonacceptableobjectives.3.1.1TheInfluenceontheHighestandLowestGoalsThehighestgoalisalsocalledtheoptimalexpectedgoal,whichisthehighestgoaltobepursuedbyone'sownsideinbusinessnegotiations,andisoftenthemaximumdegreethattheothersidecantolerate.Exceedingthisgoaloftenrisksabreakdowninnegotiations.Theminimumgoalisthegoalthatmustbeachievedinbusinessnegotiations,anditistheminimumrequirementofnegotiations.Ifitcannotbeachieved,thenegotiationwouldbebrokenratherthanthepossibilityofbargainingandcompromise.Chinesepeoplearenevervagueinsettingthehighestgoalandthelowestgoalofnegotiations.Theyliketograsptheissuesfromthewhole,whichreflectstheholisticwayofthinkingofChinesepeople--thelowestgoalisthebottomlineandtheyshouldnevergiveup.TheBritishliketounderstandeverydetailoftherelationshipduringthenegotiation,soastoensuretheprecisionandefficiencyoftheoperationinthefuture.ThisreflectstheanalyticalwayofthinkingofBritishpeople,wholiketoconsiderproblemsfromthedetails.Thetwosideshavedifferentwaysofthinking,sotheirhighestandlowestgoalsaredifferent.Inordertopromotethesuccessofthenegotiation,thehighestandlowestgoalsshouldbesetwithintherangeacceptabletotheothersideasfaraspossible,soastoavoidthebreakdownofthenegotiation.3.1.2TheInfluenceonActualDemandTargetsThetargetofactualdemandisthetargetofnegotiationwhichisincorporatedintothenegotiationplanbythenegotiatingpartiesafterscientificdemonstration,predictionandaccountingbasedonsubjectiveandobjectivefactors,takingintoaccountallaspectsofthesituation.Inthenegotiationgoal,theactualdemandgoalisthesecretinternalsecret,whichisgenerallyonlyputforwardinafewdelicatestagesinthenegotiationprocess,andisthe"lastlineofdefense"heldbythenegotiator.Ifthatisnotachieved,thetalkscouldstallorbesuspended.Chinausesemotionalthinkinginthisregard,andgenerallyexpectsthenegotiationcounterparttomakeitclearfirst,whiletheotherside"acceptsthegoodsituation"or"givesthestepdown".TheBritish,ontheotherhand,makegooduseofrationalthinking.Theywilltakeintoaccountthatthegoalisrelatedtothemainortotaleconomicinterestsofonesideofthenegotiation,andwillonlydeterminetheactualdemandgoalaftermorecarefulobservationandcomparison.Theytendtoconsideroutcomesbeforeproposingactualrequirementsgoalsandthenproposethemattheend.3.1.3TheInfluenceonAcceptableGoalsAcceptablegoalreferstothescopeofstrivingforormakingconcessionsinthenegotiation,whichcanmeetpartofthedemandsofonesideandrealizepartofeconomicbenefits.Acceptablegoalisanelasticintervalbetweenthehighestgoalandthelowestgoal,sothatthenegotiationhasaroomtomaneuver.Itisnotonlythebargainingfocusofthetwosides,butalsothescopeofpossibleagreementreachedinthenegotiation.Intermsofdeterminingacceptabletargets,ChinaandBritainhavedifferentwaysofthinking,andtheelasticintervalofacceptabletargetsisalsodifferent.Chinesepeoplemakegooduseofclosed-loopthinkinginthisregard,andaregoodatlookingatthewhole,strivingforasatisfactoryandharmoniousnegotiation.Theywillconsidertheleewayofacceptabletargetscomprehensivelyandtrytheirbesttoachieveasatisfactoryconclusion.Onthecontrary,Britishpeoplelikelinearthinking.Iftheyfailtoreachthehighestgoal,theywilltakethehighestgoalasonepointanddisperseseveralacceptablegoalpointstoseekthefinalsolution.3.2TheInfluenceontheNegotiationProcessInthenegotiationprocess,weshouldpayattentiontocommunicationtoavoidthedeadlockcausedbydifferencesinthinkingmodes.AccordingtotheinfluenceofdifferencesinthinkingmodesbetweenChinaandBritainonthenegotiationprocess,itcanbesubdividedintotheinfluenceontheopeningstage,theinfluenceonthequotationstage,theinfluenceonthenegotiationstageandtheinfluenceonthetransactionstage.3.2.1TheInfluenceontheOpeningPhaseInbusinessnegotiation,bothpartiesorpartieshaveobviouspurpose.Thebeginningofbusinessnegotiationisthestartingpointofnegotiation,whichplaysaroleinguidingthenegotiationandisrelatedtothecontrolandinitiativeofthenegotiation.Theattitude,sincerity,emotionandbehaviorofbothpartiesmaybeaffected.Asuccessfulnegotiationdependsongettingofftoagoodstart,andgettingofftoagoodstartdependsonthelanguageofbothsides,inwhichwayofthinkingplaysacrucialrole.Intheopeningstageofthenegotiation,thefirstthingistocreateagoodnegotiationatmosphere.Negotiationsneedanatmosphereoftrust,harmony,rapportandfriendliness.ChinaandtheUKhavedifferentwaysofthinking.Whencreatinganegotiationatmosphere,weneedtofullyunderstandtheculturalandsocialbackgroundoftheothercountry,makeclearthewayofthinkingoftheotherside,soastothinkfromtheperspectiveoftheotherside.Inthisway,wecanavoid"sayingmorethanwrong",createagoodnegotiationatmosphereandcreateagoodnegotiationstart.3.2.2TheInfluenceontheQuotationStageQuotationisaverykeylinkintheprocessofbusinessnegotiation.Itisnotonlythepreludetoarousetheotherside'sinterestinthetransaction,butalsothebeginningofinfluencingthefinalresultofthenegotiation.Iftheofferisproperlycontrolled,itcannotonlymeettheneedsofitsowninterests,butalsolimittheexpectationsoftheothersideinaspecificrange,andoccupytheinitiativeinthelaternegotiationstage.ThecommonquotationmethodsaredividedintoJapanesequotationsystemandWesternEuropeanquotationsystem.Inthequotation,Chinesepeoplepaymoreattentiontoclosed-loopthinking.Inthecommonquotation,WesternEuropeanquotationsystemwillgiveprioritytotheexternalcompetitionofthedealbeforemakingthequotation.TheBritish,ontheotherhand,aremorelinear.TheycommonlyuseJapanesequotationsystem,andinthequotationlinkwilloftenbestraightforwardtoexplainthekeypoints.Therefore,inthequotationstage,thethinkingdifferencebetweenthetwosidesshouldbeconsideredcomprehensivelytoavoidunreasonablequotation,unclearquotationcontentandincompleteproblemscausedbythedifferenceinthewayofthinkingbetweenChinaandtheUK.3.2.3TheInfluenceontheConsultationPhaseNegotiationandconsultationisthecorepartofthenegotiationandalsothemostintenseanddifficultstageinthenegotiation.Itisnotonlyacontestofstrength,thinkingandexperienceofthenegotiatingparties,butalsoaprocessofseekingcommongroundwhileshelvingdifferences,seekingcooperation,mutualunderstandingandcompromise.Thisstagedirectlyaffectstheinterestsofthenegotiatingpartiesanddeterminestheoverallsatisfactionoftheparties.TheChinesewayofthinkingisaboutharmony,whiletheBritishwayofthinkingismoreaboutlogicandaccuracy.Therefore,whenfacingtheBritishsideinthenegotiationstage,itisnecessarytoavoidthedeadlockcausedbydifferencesinthinkingmodes.Chinashouldtrytosupportitsviewswithsufficientdataandspecifyvaguedetailssoastoreachafinalagreement.Ifthereisadeadlock,itisnecessaryforbothsidestothinkflexibly,thinkmorefromtheotherside'sperspective,carefullyidentifytherootcausesoftheimpasse,andthenadoptaflexiblewayofthinkingtosolvetheproblem,breakthedeadlock,andfacilitatethenegotiation.3.2.4TheInfluenceontheTransactionStageInthetransactionstage,namelythecontractsigningstage,nomatterhowmanyroundsofbargaining,competitionandconcessionshavebeenexperiencedinthepreviousnegotiationprocess,abusinesscontractshouldbesignedafterallimportantcontentsofthebusinesscommunicationhavebeencompletelyreached.Thetransactionstageisthefinalfootholdofthenegotiationactivities.Inthetransactionstage,oncetheothersiderevealstheimpliedsigningintention,itisnecessarytouseaflexiblewayofthinkingtoindicatetheirsigningintention,thenpromotetheconclusionofthetransaction.Therearemanyfactorsaffectingthetransaction.Themostimportantthingistolearntocapturethetransactionsignalsexpressedbytheothersidethroughthinking,cultivatetheirlogicalthinkingability,enhancetheconceptofformallogic,andavoidbeingunabletodeterminewhethertheothersidehastheintentiontosignacontractbecauseofthinkingdifferences.Whensigningacontract,itisnecessarytocarefullyreviewandpreventtheambiguityofcontracttermscausedbydifferencesinthinking.3.3TheInfluenceonNegotiatingStyleInfluencedbythecurvewayofthinking,ChineseandBritishpeoplehavedifferentnegotiationstyles.Ininternationalbusinessnegotiations,Chineseexpresseuphemisticallyandimplicitly,trytheirbesttoavoidconflicts,andarepatientwiththenegotiationprocess.Chinesenegotiatorsliketomakeroundaboutstatementsoftheirownopinionstosavethefaceofbothsidesofthenegotiation,andpayattentionto"harmonyisthemostvaluable".Chinesepeopleattachgreatimportancetocomprehensivethinking.Theyareusedtointegratingthevariouspartsandthinkingfromtheconceptofthewhole.Ininternationalbusinessnegotiations,Britishpeoplewhoaresubjecttolinearthinkingwillbeenthusiasticandfrank,payattentiontoefficiency,cherishtime,getstraighttothetopicandgett
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 2026年3年级阅读测试题答案
- 2026年08五年种植试卷及答案
- 2026年15周年答题题库及答案
- 2026年1职业能力测试题及答案
- 2026年7年级语文单元测试卷及答案
- 2026年4级英语试题答案
- 一年级科学下册湘科版2.1认识水 课件
- 异位妊娠患者疼痛管理方法
- 建筑施工项目安全防护设施检查验收流程指南
- 餐饮行业食品安全管理与操作标准手册
- 2026年银川韩美林艺术馆春季招聘建设笔试参考题库及答案解析
- 外部董事调研工作制度
- 绍兴市2026公安机关辅警招聘考试笔试题库(含答案)
- 2026年第一季度全国安全事故分析及警示
- 银行适老化工作制度
- 2026中国中医科学院西苑医院招聘药学部工作人员2人备考题库(事业编)及答案详解(夺冠)
- 中国网球协会匹克球国家二级裁判员培训班考试题(附答案)
- 2024-2025学年度正德职业技术学院单招考试文化素质数学考前冲刺试卷(考试直接用)附答案详解
- 2026山东出版集团有限公司招聘193人备考题库及完整答案详解(典优)
- 2026春季四川成都环境投资集团有限公司下属成都市兴蓉环境股份有限公司校园招聘47人笔试模拟试题及答案解析
- 2026年安徽省C20联盟中考二模物理试题(含答案)
评论
0/150
提交评论