雨课堂学堂在线学堂云《Legal Dotrines and Case Analysis（宁夏）》单元测试考核答案

第1题WhichofthefollowingisakeyprincipleoftheUnjustEnrichmentDoctrine?AApartyshouldnotbeallowedtobenefitattheexpenseofanotherpartywithoutjustification.BApartyshouldonlybeheldliableifthereisacontractualagreementinplace.CApartyshouldbeentitledtoanybenefitstheyreceive,regardlessofthecircumstances.DApartycanbeenrichedunjustlyaslongastheycompensatetheotherpartyinthefuture.第2题Inordertoestablishaclaimofunjustenrichment,whichofthefollowingelementsmustbeproven?AThedefendantreceivedabenefit.BTheplaintiffsufferedaloss.CThedefendant’sactionswereintentional.DTheplaintiffhadapre-existinglegaldutytoprovidethebenefit.第3题Whichofthefollowingisanexampleofunjustenrichment?AAcontractorcompletesarenovationprojectandchargesthehomeownertwicetheagreed-uponprice.BAcustomeraccidentallyreceivesanextraitemwhenorderingonlineanddecidestokeepitwithoutpayingforit.CAlandlorddeductsexcessivefeesfromatenant’ssecuritydepositwithoutprovidingavalidreason.DAbusinesssellsadefectiveproducttoacustomerandrefusestoprovidearefundorreplacement.第4题WhatistheprimarypurposeoftheUnjustEnrichmentDoctrine?AToensurepartiesarecompensatedforanylossestheysuffer.BTopreventpartiesfrombenefitingunfairlyattheexpenseofothers.CToencouragepartiestoenterintocontractualagreements.DToestablishclearguidelinesfordetermininglegaldutiesandobligations.第5题WhichlegalprincipleiscloselyrelatedtotheUnjustEnrichmentDoctrine?ACaveatemptor(buyerbeware)BResipsaloquitur(thethingspeaksforitself)CPromissoryestoppel(relianceonpromises)DContributorynegligence(sharedresponsibilityforharm)第6题InFibrosaSpolkaAkcyjnav.FairbairnLawsonCombeBarbourLtd(1943),thecourtheldthatacontractbecomesvoidif:AItisnotinwritingBItisnotsignedbybothpartiesCItisimpossibletoperformduetounforeseencircumstancesDItcontainsambiguousterms第7题WhatwasthemainissueinFibrosaSpolkaAkcyjnav.FairbairnLawsonCombeBarbourLtd(1943)?ABreachofcontractBFraudulentmisrepresentationCUnilateralmistakeDFrustrationofcontract第8题ThecourtinFibrosaSpolkaAkcyjnav.FairbairnLawsonCombeBarbourLtd(1943)ruledthatthecontractwasfrustratedbecause:AThedefendantfailedtoperformtheirobligationsBTheplaintiffbreachedthetermsofthecontractCBothpartieswereunabletoperformduetounforeseeneventsDThecontractwasnotproperlyexecuted第9题AccordingtoFibrosaSpolkaAkcyjnav.FairbairnLawsonCombeBarbourLtd(1943),frustrationofcontractoccurswhen:AOnepartyintentionallybreachesthecontractBBothpartiesagreetoterminatethecontractCTheperformancebecomesimpossibleorradicallydifferentDThecontractisnotproperlyexecuted第10题InFibrosaSpolkaAkcyjnav.FairbairnLawsonCombeBarbourLtd(1943),thecourtdeterminedthatwhenacontractisfrustrated:ATheinnocentpartyisentitledtodamagesBThecontractremainsvalidandenforceableCBothpartiesarereleasedfromtheirobligationsDThecontractisautomaticallyterminated.第1题WhichofthefollowingbestdescribestheDoctrineoftheFruitofthePoisonousTree?AAlegalprinciplethatallowsevidenceobtainedunlawfullytobeadmissibleincourt.BAlegalprinciplethatexcludesevidencederivedfromillegallyobtainedevidence.CAlegalprinciplethatallowslawenforcementtouseanymeansnecessarytoobtainevidence.DAlegalprinciplethatgrantsimmunitytodefendantswhoprovideinformationaboutothersinvolvedinacrime.第2题AccordingtotheDoctrineoftheFruitofthePoisonousTree,evidencederivedfromillegallyobtainedevidenceisconsidered:AAdmissibleincourt.BInadmissibleincourt.CSubjecttofurtherinvestigation.DOnlyadmissibleifitleadstoaconviction.第3题WhichofthefollowingscenarioswouldlikelybeconsideredaviolationoftheDoctrineoftheFruitofthePoisonousTree?AApoliceofficerobtainsasearchwarrantbasedoncredibleevidenceandfindsillegaldrugsinasuspect’shome.BApoliceofficercoercesaconfessionoutofasuspectwithoutreadingthemtheirMirandarights,leadingtothediscoveryofadditionalevidence.CApoliceofficerconductsaroutinetrafficstopandfindsaweaponinthesuspect’svehiclewithoutanyprobablecause.DApoliceofficerobtainsavalidsearchwarrantbutmistakenlysearchesthewrongaddress,findingevidencerelatedtoadifferentcrime.第4题TheDoctrineoftheFruitofthePoisonousTreeprimarilyaimsto:AProtecttherightsoflawenforcementofficers.BEnsurethatallevidenceisadmissibleincourt.CDeterlawenforcementfromusingillegalmethodstoobtainevidence.DGrantimmunitytothosewhoprovidevaluableinformationincriminalinvestigations.第5题WhichofthefollowingstatementsisconsistentwiththeDoctrineoftheFruitofthePoisonousTree?AEvidenceobtainedillegallycanbeusedincourtifitleadstoaconviction.BIllegallyobtainedevidenceisalwaysadmissibleincourt.CIfevidenceisderivedfromillegallyobtainedevidence,itisalsoconsideredtaintedandinadmissible.DTheDoctrineoftheFruitofthePoisonousTreeonlyappliestocriminalcases,notcivilcases.第6题InSilverthorneLumberCo.v.UnitedStates(1920),theUnitedStatesSupremeCourtruledthat:AThegovernmenthastheauthoritytoseizeevidencewithoutawarrant.BThegovernmenthastheauthoritytoseizeevidencewithoutawarrant.CThegovernmenthastheauthoritytoseizeevidencewithoutawarrant.DTheexclusionaryruledoesnotapplytocasesinvolvingillegalsearchandseizure.第7题TheprimaryissueinSilverthorneLumberCo.v.UnitedStates(1920)was:AWhetherabusinesscanbeheldliablefortheactionsofitsemployees.BWhetherabusinesscanbeheldliablefortheactionsofitsemployees.CWhetherabusinesscanbeheldliablefortheactionsofitsemployees.DWhethertheFourthAmendmentappliestobusinesses.第8题InSilverthorneLumberCo.v.UnitedStates(1920),theCourtheldthatthegovernment’sseizureofdocumentsfromthecompanywas:ALawfulandadmissibleasevidence.BLawfulandadmissibleasevidence.CLawfulandadmissibleasevidence.DUnlawfulbutadmissibleasevidence.第9题TheSilverthorneLumberCo.v.UnitedStates(1920)caseestablishedtheprinciplethat:ATheexclusionaryruleappliestoallcasesinvolvingillegalsearchandseizure.BTheexclusionaryruleappliestoallcasesinvolvingillegalsearchandseizure.CTheexclusionaryruleappliestoallcasesinvolvingillegalsearchandseizure.DTheFourthAmendmentdoesnotprotectbusinessesfromunreasonablesearchesandseizures.第10题TherulinginSilverthorneLumberCo.v.UnitedStates(1920)hadsignificantimplicationsfor:ATherightsofbusinessesinrelationtogovernmentsearchesandseizures.BTherightsofbusinessesinrelationtogovernmentsearchesandseizures.CTherightsofbusinessesinrelationtogovernmentsearchesandseizures.DTheauthorityofthegovernmenttoseizedocumentswithoutawarrant.Test3第1题Therescuedoctrineisalegalprinciplethatallowsapersontorecoverdamagesifthey:AVoluntarilyassistinsavingsomeone’slifeorpropertyBAccidentallycauseharmwhiletryingtorescuesomeoneCRefusetoassistinarescueoperationDAreinjuredwhileattemptingtorescuesomeone第2题Undertherescuedoctrine,apersoncanrecoverdamagesiftheiractionswere:ANegligentBIntentionalCRecklessDReasonableandnecessary第3题Therescuedoctrineisbasedontheprinciplethat:AGoodSamaritansshouldberewardedfortheiractionsBThosewhocauseharmwhilerescuingothersshouldbeheldliableCPeoplehaveadutytoassistothersinemergencysituationsDRescuingsomeoneisalwaysalegallyprotectedactivity第4题Inordertosuccessfullyclaimdamagesundertherescuedoctrine,apersonmustprovethat:AThepersontheywererescuingwasastrangerBTheyactedwiththeintenttosavesomeone’slifeCTheyactedreasonablyunderthecircumstancesDTheyhadpriortraininginrescueoperations第5题Therescuedoctrineismostcommonlyappliedincasesinvolving:AMedicalemergenciesBNaturaldisastersCVehicleaccidentsDCriminalactivities第6题InWagnerv.InternationalRailwayCo.(1921),therescuedoctrinerefersto:AAlegalprinciplethatholdsindividualsresponsiblefortheirownsafetyBAlegalprinciplethatholdsemployersliableforaccidentsthatoccurduringrescueattemptsCAlegalprinciplethatallowsfortherecoveryofdamagesforinjuriessustainedwhilerescuingothersDAlegalprinciplethatlimitsliabilityforinjuriessustainedduringrescueattempts第7题TherescuedoctrineinWagnerv.InternationalRailwayCo.(1921)wasappliedtodetermine:ATheextentofdamagesthatcouldbeawardedtotheinjuredpartyBWhetherthedefendanthadadutytorescuetheplaintiffCWhethertheplaintiffactednegligentlyduringtherescueattemptD)Whethertheplaintiffwasentitledtoworkers’compensationbenefits第8题TherescuedoctrineinWagnerv.InternationalRailwayCo.(1921)wasbasedontheprincipleof:AComparativenegligenceBAssumptionofriskCVicariousliabilityDThedutytorescue第9题Thecourt’sdecisioninWagnerv.InternationalRailwayCo.(1921)regardingtherescuedoctrinehadimplicationsfor:AWorkplacesafetyregulationsBPersonalinjuryliabilityCCriminallawDIntellectualpropertyrights第10题TherescuedoctrineinWagnerv.InternationalRailwayCo.(1921)wasappliedtodeterminewhether:ATheplaintiff’sinjurieswerecausedbythedefendant’snegligenceBTheplaintiff’srescueattemptwasareasonableandforeseeableactionCThedefendanthadadutytowarntheplaintiffofpotentialdangersDTheplaintiff’sinjurieswerearesultoftheirownnegligenceTest4第1题Thedoctrineofassumptionofriskrefersto:AAlegalprinciplethatholdsindividualsresponsiblefortheirownsafetyB)AlegalprinciplethatallowsindividualstowaivetheirrighttosuefordamagesCAlegalprinciplethatlimitsliabilityforinjuriessustainedduringinherentlydangerousactivitiesDAlegalprinciplethatrequiresindividualstotakereasonableprecautionstoavoidinjury第2题Inthecontextofassumptionofrisk,theburdenofprooflieswith:ATheplaintiff,toprovethatthedefendantwasnegligentBThedefendant,toprovethattheplaintiffknowinglyassumedtherisksinvolvedCThecourt,todeterminetheextentofdamagesthatshouldbeawardedDThejury,todecidewhethertheplaintiff’sactionswerereasonable第3题Thedoctrineofassumptionofriskmaynotapplyif:ATheplaintiffwasunawareoftherisksinvolvedintheactivityBThedefendantfailedtoprovideproperwarningorinstructionregardingtherisksCTheplaintiffsignedawaiverreleasingthedefendantfromliabilityDTheplaintiffvoluntarilyparticipatedintheactivitydespitebeingawareoftherisks第4题Thedoctrineofassumptionofriskisoftenappliedincasesinvolving:AWorkplaceaccidentsBMedicalmalpracticeCProductliabilityDRecreationalactivities第5题Whenthedoctrineofassumptionofriskissuccessfullyinvoked,theplaintiff:AIsnotentitledtoanycompensationfortheirinjuriesBCanstillrecoverdamagesifthedefendant’sconductwasgrosslynegligentCIsheldpartiallyliablefortheirinjuriesandthedamagesarereducedaccordinglyDMustprovethatthedefendantintentionallycausedtheirinjuries第6题IntheKnightv.Jewettcase,theCaliforniaSupremeCourtruledthatthedoctrineofassumptionofrisk:ACouldnolongerbeusedasadefenseinpersonalinjurycasesBOnlyappliedtocasesinvolvingrecreationalactivitiesCAppliedtocasesinvolvingbothrecreationalandnon-recreationalactivitiesDWasonlyapplicableincasesinvolvingprofessionalathletes第7题TheKnightv.Jewettdecisionclarifiedthatthedoctrineofassumptionofriskrequires:ATheplaintifftohaveexplicitknowledgeofthespecificrisksinvolvedBThedefendanttohaveprovidedawrittenwaiverofliabilitytotheplaintiffCThedefendanttohaveintentionallycausedharmtotheplaintiffDTheplaintifftohavevoluntarilyparticipatedintheactivitydespitetheknownrisks第8题TheKnightv.Jewettdecisionemphasizedthatthedoctrineofassumptionofriskisbasedon:AThedefendant’sdutytoprovideasafeenvironmentfortheplaintiffBTheplaintiff’sdutytoexercisereasonablecaretoavoidinjuryCThedefendant’sdutytowarntheplaintiffofallpotentialrisksDTheplaintiff’sdutytoprovethatthedefendantwasnegligent第9题FollowingtheKnightv.Jewettdecision,thedoctrineofassumptionofriskmaystillapplyif:ATheplaintiffsignedageneralwaiverofliabilitybeforeparticipatingintheactivityBThedefendantfailedtoprovideanywarningorinstructionregardingtherisksinvolvedCTheplaintiffwasnotawareofthespecificrisksassociatedwiththeactivityDThedefendant’sconductwasfoundtobegrosslynegligentorintentional第10题TheKnightv.Jewettdecisionhighlightedtheimportanceof:AAllowingplaintiffstorecoverdamagesregardlessoftheirownnegligenceBHoldingdefendantsstrictlyliableforanyinjuriessustainedbytheplaintiffCBalancingtherightsandresponsibilitiesofboththeplaintiffandthedefendantDEliminatingthedoctrineofassumptionofriskentirelyfromthelegalsystem.Test5第1题Accordingtothedoctrineofstaredecisis,whichofthefollowingstatementsistrue?ACourtsareboundtofollowtheirownpreviousdecisions.BCourtsarenotboundtofollowtheirownpreviousdecisions.CCourtsareboundtofollowdecisionsmadebylowercourts.DCourtsarenotboundtofollowdecisionsmadebylowercourts.第2题StaredecisisisaLatintermthatmeans:A“Letthedecisionstand.”B“Changethedecision.”C“Ignorethedecision.”D“Overturnthedecision.”第3题Thedoctrineofstaredecisispromotes:AFlexibilityandadaptabilityinthelegalsystem.BConsistencyandpredictabilityinthelegalsystem.CDiscretionandsubjectivityinthelegalsystem.DInstabilityanduncertaintyinthelegalsystem.第4题Whichofthefollowingisanexceptiontothedoctrineofstaredecisis?AOverrulingapreviousdecision.BFollowingapreviousdecisionmadebyadifferentcourt.CIgnoringapreviousdecisionmadebyahighercourt.DAdheringtoapreviousdecisionmadebyalowercourt.第5题Theprimarypurposeofthedoctrineofstaredecisisisto:AEnsurethatallcourtdecisionsareunanimous.BEncouragejudicialactivismandinnovation.CPreservestabilityandconsistencyinthelegalsystem.DDisregardtheimportanceofprecedentinlegalcases.第6题InthecaseofHAUMSCHILDv.CONTINENTALCAS.CO.,theSupremeCourtofWisconsin:AOverturnedapreviousdecision.BEstablishedanewprecedent.CFollowedapreviousdecision.第7题ThedoctrineofstaredecisisrequirestheSupremeCourtofWisconsinto:AAlwaysfollowitsownpreviousdecisions.BNeverfollowitsownpreviousdecisions.COnlyfollowdecisionsmadebylowercourts.第8题TheHAUMSCHILDv.CONTINENTALCAS.CO.decisionisconsideredbindingprecedentin:AAllfutureWisconsincases.BAllfutureU.S.federalcases.CAllfutureinsurance-relatedcases第9题Thedoctrineofstaredecisispromotesconsistencyinthelegalsystemby:AAllowingcourtstochangetheirdecisionsasneeded.BEncouragingcourtstoignorepreviousdecisions.CEnsuringthatcourtsfollowestablishedprecedents.第10题TheSupremeCourtofWisconsin’sdecisioninHAUMSCHILDv.ALowercourtsinWisconsinmustfollow.BLowercourtsinotherstatesmustfollow.CAllcourtsaroundtheworldmustfollow.Test6第1题Thedoctrineofresjudicataprevents:AThedefendantfromappealingacourt’sdecision.BTheplaintifffromfilingalawsuitagainstthesamedefendant.CTheplaintifffrompresentingnewevidenceinatrial.DThedefendantfrompresentingacounterclaiminalawsuit.第2题Resjudicataapplieswhen:AAcaseisdismissedwithoutprejudice.BAcaseisdismissedwithprejudice.CAcaseisappealedtoahighercourt.DAcaseissettledoutofcourt.第3题Thepurposeofthedoctrineofresjudicataisto:APreventmultiplelawsuitsoverthesameissue.BAllowpartiestore-litigatetheircaseindefinitely.CEncouragepartiestosettletheirdisputesoutsideofcourt.DGivethedefendantanopportunitytoappealanunfavorabledecision.第4题Resjudicatarequiresthatthefollowingconditionsaremet:AThesameparties,samecauseofaction,andafinaljudgment.BDifferentparties,samecauseofaction,andafinaljudgment.CThesameparties,differentcauseofaction,andafinaljudgment.DDifferentparties,differentcauseofaction,andafinaljudgment.第5题Theeffectofresjudicataisthat:AApartycannotbringthesameclaimagainstthesamepartyagain.BApartycanbringthesameclaimagainstthesamepartyagain.CApartycanbringadifferentclaimagainstthesameparty.DApartycanbringthesameclaimagainstadifferentparty.第6题InTaylorv.Sturgell(2008),theSupremeCourtaddressedtheissueof:APersonalinjuryclaims.BCopyrightinfringement.CResjudicatainthecontextofaviationaccidents.DResjudicatainthecontextofidentitytheft.第7题TheTaylorv.Sturgellcaseestablishedthatthedoctrineofresjudicatacanbeappliedto:AIndividualswhowerenotpartiestotheoriginallawsuit.BOnlytheoriginalpartiesinvolvedinthelawsuit.CCasesinvolvingintellectualpropertydisputes.DCriminalcases第8题TheTaylorv.Sturgellcaseclarifiedthatanonpartycanbeprecludedfromrelitigatingaclaimif:AThenonpartyhadasignificantinterestinthepreviouslawsuit.BThenonpartyisrelatedtooneoftheoriginalparties.CThenonpartyisaclosefriendofoneoftheoriginalparties.DThenonpartywasnotproperlyservedwiththeoriginallawsuit.第9题TheTaylorv.Sturgellcaseemphasizedtheimportanceof:AResolvinglegaldisputesthroughalternativedisputeresolutionmethods.BAllowingnonpartiestointerveneinongoinglawsuits.CEnsuringfairnessandconsistencyinthejudicialprocess.DEncouragingnonpartiestofileseparatelawsuitsonthesameissue.第10题TheTaylorv.Sturgellcaseultimatelyupheldthedoctrineofresjudicataasameansto:APreventthesamepartiesfromlitigatingthesameissuemultipletimes.BAllownonpartiestojoinongoinglawsuits.CEncouragethefilingofnewlawsuitsonthesameissue.DOverturnpreviousdecisionsinordertoachievejustice.Test7第1题Thedoctrineofrespondeatsuperiorisalegalprinciplethatholds:AEmployersliablefortheactionsoftheiremployees.BEmployeesliablefortheactionsoftheiremployers.CBothemployersandemployeesjointlyliableforanywrongdoing.DOnlytheindividualdirectlyresponsibleforthewrongdoing.第2题Respondeatsuperioriscommonlyappliedincasesinvolving:AMedicalmalpractice.BBreachofcontract.CProductliability.DVicariousliabilityintheemploymentcontext.第3题Underthedoctrineofrespondeatsuperior,anemployercanbeheldliablefortheactionsofanemployeeif:ATheemployeeactedwithinthescopeoftheiremployment.BTheemployerdirectlyinstructedtheemployeetocommitthewrongfulact.CTheemployerwasawareoftheemployee’smisconductbutfailedtotakeaction.DTheemployerandemployeearejointlyresponsibleregardlessofthecircumstances.第4题Themainpurposeofthedoctrineofrespondeatsuperioristo:AEncourageemployerstotakeresponsibilityfortheactionsoftheiremployees.BShiftliabilityfromemployerstoemployees.CEnsurethatemployeesareheldpersonallyliableforanywrongdoing.DLimittheliabilityofemployersincasesofemployeemisconduct.第5题Thedoctrineofrespondeatsuperiorappliestowhichofthefollowingsituations?AAdeliverydrivercausinganaccidentwhileonduty.BAnindependentcontractorperformingworkforacompany.CAnemployeecommittingacrimeoutsideofworkhours.DAcustomerslippingandfallinginastore.第6题InFarwellv.Boston&WorcesterRailroadCorp.,thecourtheldthatthedoctrineofrespondeatsuperiorapplieswhen:ATheemployerexplicitlydirectedtheemployeetocommitawrongfulact.BTheemployeeactedwithinthescopeoftheiremployment.CTheemployerhadnoknowledgeoftheemployee’sactions.DTheemployeewasanindependentcontractor.第7题TheFarwellv.Boston&WorcesterRailroadCorp.caseestablishedthatemployerscanbeheldliableunderrespondeatsuperiorfor:ANegligenthiringofemployees.BIntentionaltortscommittedbyemployees.CActionscommittedbyindependentcontractors.DActionscommittedbyemployeesoutsideofworkhours.第8题Farwellv.Boston&WorcesterRailroadCorp.clarifiedthatthedoctrineofrespondeatsuperiorisbasedontheprincipleof:AVicariousliability.BStrictliability.CJointliability.DContributorynegligence.第9题AccordingtoFarwellv.Boston&WorcesterRailroadCorp.,employerscanbeheldliablefortheactionsoftheiremployeesevenif:ATheemployeeactedoutsidethescopeoftheiremployment.BTheemployeewasactinginself-defense.CTheemployeewasanindependentcontractor.DTheemployee’sactionswereunforeseeable.第10题TheFarwellv.Boston&WorcesterRailroadCorp.casecontributedtothedevelopmentofthedoctrineofrespondeatsuperiorby:AEstablishingacleardefinitionofwhatconstitutesanemployee.BLimitingtheliabilityofemployersincasesofemployeemisconduct.CExpandingthescopeofemployerliabilityforemployeeactions.DAbolishingthedoctrineofrespondeatsuperioraltogether.Test8第1题Thedoctrineofresipsaloquiturapplieswhen:AThereisclearevidenceofthedefendant’snegligence.BTheplaintiffispartiallyresponsiblefortheirowninjuries.CThedefendantisanemployeeoftheplaintiff.DThecauseoftheaccidentisunknown.第2题Resipsaloquiturallowstheplaintiffto:AAvoidtheburdenofprovingthedefendant’snegligence.BRecoverdamagesregardlessoftheirownnegligence.CShifttheburdenofprooftothedefendant.DDismissthecasewithoutfurtherinvestigation.第3题Inordertoestablishresipsaloquitur,theplaintiffmustshowthat:AThedefendantbreachedadutyofcare.BThedefendantactedintentionally.CThedefendant’sactionswereunforeseeable.DThedefendanthadnocontroloverthesituation.第4题Resipsaloquiturisoftenappliedincasesinvolving:AMedicalmalpractice.BProductliability.CSlipandfallaccidents.DBreachofcontract.第5题ThedoctrineofresipsaloquituroriginatedfromtheLatinphrase,whichmeans:A“Thethingspeaksforitself.”B“Innocentuntilprovenguilty.”C“Negligenceispresumed.”D“Beyondareasonabledoubt.”第6题InthecaseofByrnev.Boadle(1863),resipsaloquiturwasappliedto:AAmedicalmalpracticecase.BAproductliabilitycase.CAslipandfallaccidentcase.DAbreachofcontractcase.第7题Resipsaloquiturallowstheplaintiffto:AShifttheburdenofprooftothedefendant.BReceivecompensationwithoutprovingnegligence.CFilealawsuitwithoutanyevidence.DAvoidtheneedforexperttestimony.第8题TheprincipleestablishedinByrnev.Boadle(1863)statesthatresipsaloquiturapplieswhen:AThedefendanthassuperiorknowledgeorcontroloverthesituation.BTheplaintiff’sinjurieswerecausedbytheirownnegligence.CThedefendanthasahistoryofsimilaraccidents.DTheplaintiffisunabletoprovethespecificactofnegligence.第9题Resipsaloquiturisoftenusedwhen:ATheplaintiffanddefendanthaveapre-existingrelationship.BThecauseoftheaccidentisunknown.CTheplaintiff’sinjuriesareminororinsignificant.DThedefendantadmitstotheirnegligence.第10题Thedoctrineofresipsaloquitur,asappliedinByrnev.Boadle(1863),means:A“Thethingspeaksforitself.”B“Innocentuntilprovenguilty.”C“Negligenceispresumed.”D“Beyondareasonabledoubt.”Test9第1题TheDoctrineoftheStatuteofLimitationsetsatimelimitfor:AFilingalawsuit.BCollectingevidence.CNegotiatingasettlement.DAppealingacourtdecision.第2题ThepurposeoftheDoctrineoftheStatuteofLimitationisto:AEnsurethatcasesareresolvedquickly.BProtectdefendantsfromstaleclaims.CLimitthejurisdictionofthecourt.DEncourageout-of-courtsettlements第3题ThetimelimitimposedbytheDoctrineoftheStatuteofLimitationvariesdependingon:ATheseverityoftheoffense.BThedefendant’sfinancialstatus.CThelocationoftheincident.DThetypeoflegalclaim.第4题IfaplaintifffailstofilealawsuitwithinthespecifiedtimelimitundertheDoctrineoftheStatuteofLimitation,theconsequenceisusually:AAutomaticdismissalofthecase.BExtensionofthetimelimit.CMandatorymediationorarbitration.DReduceddamagesawardedtotheplaintiff.第5题TheDoctrineoftheStatuteofLimitationmaybetolledorsuspendedundercertaincircumstances,suchas:AThedefendant’sabsencefromthejurisdiction.BTheplaintiff’sfinancialhardship.CTheplaintiff’slackoflegalrepresentation.DThedefendant’sadmissionofguilt.第6题ThepurposeoftheDoctrineoftheStatuteofLimitationistostrikeabalancebetween:AProtectingtherightsoftheplaintiffandthedefendant.BEnsuringaccesstojusticeandpreventingunduedelayCEncouraginglitigationandavoidingovercrowdedcourts.DExpeditingthelegalprocessandpreservingevidence.第7题ThetimelimitundertheDoctrineoftheStatuteofLimitationtypicallybeginstorunfromthe:ADatethelawsuitisfiled.BDateoftheincidentorinjury.CDatetheplaintiffdiscoverstheharmsuffered.DDatethedefendantisnotifiedoftheclaim.第8题TheDoctrineoftheStatuteofLimitationmaybeextendedincasesinvolving:AFraudorconcealmentbythedefendant.BMultipledefendants.CInternationaldisputes.DGovernmententitiesasdefendants.Test10第1题AccordingtotheDoctrineofUncleanHands,whichofthefollowingstatementsistrue?AApartywithacleanrecordisalwaysentitledtolegalremedies.BApartywhohasengagedinwrongfulconductcannotseekequitablerelief.CTheDoctrineofUncleanHandsonlyappliestocriminalcases.DTheDoctrineofUncleanHandsisnotrecognizedinanylegaljurisdiction.第2题Inlegalterms,whatdoestheDoctrineofUncleanHandsreferto?AApartyfailingtowashtheirhandsbeforeenteringacourtroom.BApartyengaginginunethicalorwrongfulbehaviorrelatedtothecase.CApartybeingphysicallyunabletopresenttheircaseduetouncleanhands.DApartynothavingsufficientevidencetosupporttheirclaims.第3题HowdoestheDoctrineofUncleanHandsaffectapartyseekingequitablerelief?AItcompletelybarsthepartyfromseekinganyformofrelief.BItallow