资源目录
压缩包内文档预览：
编号：86384426
类型：共享资源
大小：4.36MB
格式：RAR
上传时间：2020-06-16
上传人：加Q294****549海量...
认证信息
个人认证
乐**（实名认证）
湖南
IP属地：湖南
30
积分
- 关 键 词：
-
2342
缠绕式提升机设计
缠绕
提升
设计
- 资源描述：
-
2342 缠绕式提升机设计,2342,缠绕式提升机设计,缠绕,提升,设计
- 内容简介：
-
中原工学院毕业设计英文翻译原文 Tool damageChapter 3 considered cutting tool minimum property requirements (both mechanical and thermal) to avoid immediate failure. By failure is meant damage so large that the tool has no useful ability to remove work material. Attention is turned, in this chapter, to the mech- anisms and characteristics of lesser damages that accumulate with use, and which eventu- ally cause a tool to be replaced. In reality, there is a continuous spectrum of damage severities, such that there is no sharp boundary between what is to be considered here and what might in practice be described as immediate failure. There is some overlap between this chapter and the previous one.Chapters 2 and 3 have demonstrated that cutting tools must withstand much higher fric- tion and normal stresses and usually higher temperatures too than normal machine tool bearing surfaces. There is, in most cases, no question of avoiding tool damage, but only of asking how rapidly it occurs. The damages of a cutting tool are influenced by the stress and temperature at the tool surface, which in turn depend on the cutting mode for exam- ple turning, milling or drilling; and the cutting conditions of tool and work material, cutting speed, feed rate, depth of cut and the presence or not of cutting fluid and its type. In Chapter 2, it was described in general that wear is very sensitive to small changes in sliding conditions. In machining, the tool damage mode and the rate of damage are simi- larly very sensitive to changes in the cutting operation and the cutting conditions. While tool damage cannot be avoided, it can often be reduced if its mode and what controls it is understood. Section 4.1 describes the main modes of tool damage.The economics of machining were introduced in Chapter 1. To minimize machining cost, it is necessary not only to find the most suitable tool and work materials for an oper- ation, but also to have a prediction of tool life. At the end of a tools life, the tool must be replaced or reground, to maintain workpiece accuracy, surface roughness or integrity. Section 4.2 considers tool life criteria and life prediction.4.1 Tool damage and its classification4.1.1 Types of tool damageTool damage can be classified into two groups, wear and fracture, by means of its scale and how it progresses. Wear (as discussed in Chapter 2) is loss of material on an asperity or micro-contact, or smaller scale, down to molecular or atomic removal mechanisms. It usually progresses continuously. Fracture, on the other hand, is damage at a larger scale than wear; and it occurs suddenly. As written above, there is a continuous spectrum of damage scales from micro-wear to gross fracture.Figure 4.1 shows a typical damage pattern in this case wear of a carbide tool, cutting steel at a relatively high speed. Crater wear on the rake face, flank wear on the flank faces and notch wear at the depth of cut (DOC) extremities are the typical wear modes. Wear measures, such as VB, KT are returned to in Section 4.2.Damage changes, however, with change of materials, cutting mode and cutting condi- tions, as shown in Figure 4.2. Figure 4.2(a) shows crater and flank wear, with negligible notch wear, after turning a medium carbon steel with a carbide tool at high cutting speed. If the process is changed to milling, a large crater wear with a number of cracks becomes the distinctive feature of damage (Figure 4.2(b). When turning Ni-based super alloys with ceramic tools (Figure 4.2(c) notch wear at the DOC line is the dominant damage mode while crater and flank wear are almost negligible. Figure 4.2(d) shows the result of turning a carbon steel with a silicon nitride ceramic tool (not to be recommended!). Large crater and flank wear develop in a very short time. In the case of turning b-phase Ti-alloys with a K-grade carbide tool, large amounts of work material are observed adhered to the tool, and part of the cutting edge is damaged by fracture or chipping (Figure 4.2(e).4.1.2 Causes of tool damageChapter 2.4 outlined the general conditions leading to abrasive, adhesive and chemical wear mechanisms. In the context of cutting tool damage, the importance and occurrence of these mechanisms can be classified by cutting temperature, as shown in Figure 4.3. Three causes of damage are qualitatively identified in the figure: mechanical, thermal and adhesive. Mechanical damage, which includes abrasion, chipping, early fracture and fatigue, is basi- cally independent of temperature. Thermal damage, with plastic deformation, thermal diffu- sion and chemical reaction as its typical forms, increases drastically with increasing temperature. (It should be noted that thermal diffusion and chemical reaction are not the direct cause of damage. Rather, they cause the tool surface to be weakened so that abrasion, mechanical shock or adhesion can then more easily cause material removal.) Damage based on adhesion is observed to have a local maximum in a certain temperature range.Mechanical damage Whether mechanical damage is classified as wear or fracture depends on its scale. Figure 4.4 illustrates the different modes, from a scale of less than 0.1 mm to around 100 mm (much greater than 100 mm becomes failure).Abrasive wear (illustrated schematically in Figure 2.29) is typically caused by sliding hard particles against the cutting tool. The hard particles come from either the work mater- ials microstructure, or are broken away from the cutting edge. Abrasive wear reduces the harder is the tool relative to the particles and generally depends on the distance cut (see Section 4.2.2).Attrition wear occurs on a scale larger than abrasion. Particles or grains of the tool material are mechanically weakened by micro-fracture as a result of sliding interaction with the work, before being removed by wear.Next in size comes chipping (sometimes called micro-chipping at its small-scale limit). This is caused by mechanical shock loading on a scale that leads to large fluctuations in cutting force, as opposed to the inherent local stress fluctuations that cause attrition.Finally, fracture is larger than chipping, and is classified into three types: early stage, unpredictable and final stage. The early stage occurs immediately after beginning a cut if the tool shape or cutting condition is improper; or if there is some kind of defect in the cutting tool or in its edge preparation. Unpredictable fracture can occur at any time if the stress on the cutting edge changes suddenly, for example caused by chattering or an irreg- ularity in the workpiece hardness. Final stage fracture can be observed frequently at the end of a tools life in milling: then fatigue due to mechanical or thermal stresses on the cutting edge is the main cause of damage.Thermal damage plastic deformationThe plastic deformation type of thermal damage referred to in Figure 4.3 is observed when a cutting tool at high cutting temperature cannot withstand the compressive stress on its cutting edge. It therefore occurs with tools having a high temperature sensitivity of their hardness as their weakest characteristic. Examples are high speed steel tools in general; and high cobalt content cemented carbide tools, or cermet tools, used in severe conditions, particularly at a high feed rate. Deformation of the edge leads to generation of an improper shape and rapid material removal.Thermal damage diffusionWear as a result of thermal diffusion occurs at high cutting temperatures if cutting tool and work material elements diffuse mutually into each others structure. This is well known with cemented carbide tools and has been studied over many years, by Dawihl (1941), Trent (1952), Trigger and Chao (1956), Takeyama and Murata (1963), Gregory (1965), Cook (1973), Uehara (1976), Narutaki and Yamane (1976), Usui et al. (1978) and others. The rates of processes controlled by diffusion are exponentially proportional to the inverse of the absolute temperature q. In the case of wear, different researchers have proposed different pre-exponential factors: Cook (1973) suggested depth wear h should increase with time t (equation 4.1(a); earlier, Takeyama and Murata (1963) also suggested this and the further possibility of sliding distance s being a more fundamental variable (equation 4.1(b); later Usui et al. (1978), following the ideas of contact mechanics and wear considered in Chapter 2.4, proposed wear should also increase with normal contact stress sn (equation 4.1(c). In all these cases, a plot of ln(wear rate) against 1/q gives a straight line, the slope of which is C2 igure 4.5 shows experimental results for both the crater and flank depth wear rates of a 0.25%C and a 0.46%C steel turned by a P20 grade carbide tool, plotted after the manner of equation (4.1c). Two linear regions are seen: in this case the boundary is at 1/q 8.5 104 K1 (or q 1175 K). The slope of the higher temperature data (q 1175 K) is typi- cal of diffusion processes between steels and cemented carbides (Cook, 1973). The smaller slope at lower temperatures is typical of a temperature dependent mechanical wear process, for example abrasion. Diffusion can be directly demonstrated at high temperatures in static conditions. Figure 4.6 shows a typical result of a static diffusion test in which a P-grade cemented carbide tool was loaded against a 0.15% carbon steel for 30 min at 1200C. A metallographic section through the interface between the carbide tool and the steel, etched in 4% Nital (nitric acid and alcohol) shows that the pearlite in the steel has increased from its original level. This means that carbon from the cemented carbide has diffused into the steel. Furthermore, elec- tron probe micro-analysis (EPMA) shows that Co and W from the tool material also diffuse into the steel; and iron from the steel diffuses into the tool material. Many researchers agree that mutual diffusion is the cause of carbide tool diffusion wear, but there is not agreement in detail as to the mechanism that then results in material removal.Naerheim and Trent (1977) have proposed that the wear rates of both WC-Co (K-grade) and WC-(Ti,Ta,W)C-Co (P-grade) cemented carbides are controlled by the rate of diffusion of tungsten (and Ti and Ta) and carbon atoms together into the work material, as indicated in Figure 4.7. This view is based on transmission electron microscope (TEM) observations on crater wear that show no structural changes in the tools carbide grains within a distance of 0.01 mm of the toolchip interface. The slower wear of P-grade than K-grade materials is explained by slower diffusion in the former than the latter case. Naerheim and Trent state that, in their cutting tests, pulled-out carbide grains were not observed adhering to the underside of chips. This was not Ueharas (1
- 温馨提示:
1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明，都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
2: 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等，如果需要附件，请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
3.本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸，网页内容里面会有图纸预览，若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间，仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理，对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑，并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容，请与我们联系，我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
人人文库网所有资源均是用户自行上传分享，仅供网友学习交流，未经上传用户书面授权，请勿作他用。
川公网安备: 51019002004831号