英语论文结论部分写作特点总结_第1页
英语论文结论部分写作特点总结_第2页
英语论文结论部分写作特点总结_第3页
英语论文结论部分写作特点总结_第4页
英语论文结论部分写作特点总结_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩1页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

英语论文写作 论文结论部分(Conclusion)写作特点总结 Conclusion Conclusion 是作者对所研究课题进行的总体性讨论,具有严密的科学性和客观性,反 映本研究课题的价值,同时对以后的研究具有指导意义。 Conclusion 与 Introduction 遥相呼应,因为 Introduction 部分介绍了本课题的研究目的, 那么 Conclusion 要告诉读者这些目的是否达到,在研究中做了哪些工作,取得了什么结果, 这些结果说明了什么问题,有何价值和意义,研究过程中存在或发现了哪些问题,原因是 什么,建议如何解决等。 Conclusion 的具体内容通常包含以下几个部分: (1) 概括说明本课题的研究内容、结果及其意义与价值。 (2) 比较具体地说明本研究证明了什么假设或理论,得出了什么结论,研究结果有何实 用价值,有何创造性成果或见解,解决了什么实际问题,有何应用前景等。 (3) 与他人的相关研究进行比较。 (4) 本课题的局限性、不足之处,还有哪些尚待解决的问题。 (5)展望前景,或指出进一步研究的方向。 Conclusion 通常使用现在时态 Result 和和 Conclusion 本次选取 5 篇文章, 第一篇,论文中的主要 Result 已在第 2 部分和第三部分中叙述,在 Conclusion 又重新 总结了一下。 第二篇,论文中的主要 Result 写在 Conclusion 中。 第三篇,论文中的主要 Result 写在第 3 部分(3.CASE STUDIES AND RESULTS)中, Result 和 Conclusion 是分开的。 第四篇,论文中的主要 Result 已第 4 部分的(IV. Results and Discussion)中进行叙述, Result 和 Conclusion 是分开的。 第五篇,论文中的主要 Result 已第 4 部分的(4. Results and discussion)中进行叙述, Result 和 Conclusion 是分开的。 第第 1 篇篇 题目:An overview of NACA 6-digit airfoil series characteristics with reference to airfoils for large wind turbine blades IV. Conclusions The two-dimensional aerodynamics characteristics of the NACA 63 and 64 six-digit series of airfoils measured in the NASA LTPT have been investigated, with a view to verify RFOIL calculations at high Reynolds numbers. The following conclusions can be drawn: - The zero-lift angle of the NACA 64-618 airfoil needs to be adjusted with -0.4 degrees. - The zero-lift angle of The NACA 63-615 needs to be corrected with -0.87 degrees in the smooth case and with +1 degree in case of wrap around roughness. -The maximum lift coefficients predicted with RFOIL match the LTPT data well at Re=3x106, but under predict the Cl,max at Re=6x106 by 3.5 % , up to 6.5% at Re=9x106. -It is uncertain if the established differences in lift between experiment and calculations are caused by a constant bias in the measurements or by the fact that the RFOIL code fails to predict the right level of maximum lift. -RFOIL consistently under predicts the drag coefficient. The difference is about 9% for a wide range of airfoils and Reynolds numbers -NACA standard roughness causes a reduction in the lift coefficient of 18% to 20% for most airfoils from the NACA 64 series -The zero-lift angle of airfoil NACA 64-418 with wrap-around roughness needs a correction of +0.54 degrees. -Wind tunnel experiments and side-by-side tests in the field with one clean rotor need to be done to be able to better predict the effects of roughness. 写作特点: 内容:第 1 句,概括了文章的的主要研究内容。第 2 句至第 8 句逐条的列出了文章的得出 结论。 使用了被动语态,The two-dimensional aerodynamics characteristics of the NACA 63 and 64 six-digit series of airfoils measured in the NASA LTPT have been investigated have been investigated. 主要时态为一般现在时态 第第 2 篇篇 题目: HIGH-LIFT ENHANCEMENT USING ACTIVE FLOW CONTROL V. CONCLUSIONS The high-lift performance of an airfoil with a single-element flap is enhanced significantly using an active flow control system consisting of spanwise fluidic actuators that are integrated near the separation point. Spanwise arrays of spanwise-oscillating or non-oscillating jets issue tangentially to the local surface from a miniature downstreamfacing surface step. Jet actuation leads to flow attachment of varying streamwise extent that depends on the jet momentum coefficient and the formation of a low pressure domain near the juncture between the main body and the flap. As a result, lift is increased substantially, by as much as CL = 1.40, 1.22 and 1.04 at Rec = 6.7105, 8.3105 and 1.0106, respectively, for = 4. In the present experiments, three spanwise rows of fluidic jets are placed in the vicinity of the juncture and operated in various combinations leading to significant increases in lift. The upstream (x/c = 0.59) and middle (x/c = 0.61) actuators, which are closest to separation (x/c = 0.62) are most effective, while the downstream actuator (x/c = 0.64) only produces a significant lift increment when operated in conjunction with one of the other actuators. The degree of flow attachment increases with jet momentum coefficient and simultaneous operation of multiple actuators can increase the lift increment further even when the flow is attached. Actuation results in a strong suction peak near the juncture (Cp 7.5) and also leads to increases in suction on the main body of the airfoil and near the leading edge. The lift increment is measured over a range of angles of attack (0 12) and is accompanied by an increase in lift-induced pressure drag and an increase in nose-down pitching moment. It is shown that the high-lift performance can be improved significantly by design modifications of the surface interface between the jet actuators and the surrounding flow. In particular, modifying the jet orifices from a “stepped” to a “recessed” configuration enhances the interaction of the jets with the cross flow, resulting in increased lift for a given momentum coefficient, particularly at lower levels of C. The recessed design also reduces the loss in lift caused by the presence of the orifices and the attached flow exhibits significantly stronger suction peaks near the flap juncture and the leading edge. At C = 0.36% the upstream actuator yields CL = 0.57 and 0.79 for the stepped and recessed configurations, respectively, and operating the combination of upstream and middle actuators at C = 0.36% each yields CL = 0.78 and 0.92, respectively. The effect of the actuator jets on the attached flow is characterized using PIV measurements of the flow field over the flap and additional high-magnification measurements in the vicinity of the actuators. In the absence of actuation, the flow separates near the juncture between the flap and the main body (x/c = 0.62), forming a recirculating domain over the flap and a detached vorticity layer. Actuation leads to complete flow attachment through the trailing edge with significant acceleration of the flow within the attached boundary layer downstream of the actuators and outside of the boundary layer along most of the flap. At C= 1.6% an interaction domain containing a cross-stream velocity peak (2.3 times the maximum speed of the jet under quiescent conditions) is formed along the flap between the actuator jet and the free stream flow that is particularly apparent using the recessed configuration. 这篇文章的结论部分很特殊,统计的结果为 565 个单词,包含了 4 个段落。 第 1 段概括了文章的主要研究内容(active flow control system),第 2 段到第 4 段主要说明了 文章的研究方法(experiment,PIV),以及一些具体的结果。 主要时态为一般现在时态 第第 3 篇篇 题目: REPRESENTATION METHOD EFFECTS ON GENETIC ALGORITHM IN 2-D AIRFOIL DESIGNVIBRATIONAL 4. CONCLUSION In this article, Bezier and Parsec representation methods are tested in two different flow conditions; subsonic and transonic flows. In the fist test case both representation methods are compared via VGA optimization tool under the subsonic flow conditions. The comparison between Bezier and Parsec representation methods is shown in Fig. 8. This plot emphasizes the superiority of Parsec representation method. In the second test case both representation methods are compared via VGA optimization tool under the transonic flow conditions. The comparison between Bezier and Parsec representation methods is shown in Fig. 11. This plot emphasizes the superiority of Bezier representation method. From these cases it is concluded that Parsec method is more global and more efficient than Bezier method in subsonic flows. However, Bezier method is more flexible than Parsec method within transonic flows. 本篇文章相比于上篇文章内容上比较简短:统计结果为 134 个单词,包含 1 个段落 第 1 句,概括了文章的的主要研究内容。第 2 句至第 7 句回顾了文章中的两个算例。第 8 句说明了本文方法的优越性,最后一句说明了本文方法的不足。 主要时态为一般现在时态 句型: In this article, The comparison between is shown in Fig. 8. From these cases it is concluded that However, 第第 4 篇篇 题目: Unsteady Flow Simulation of a High-Lift configuration using a Lattice Boltzmann Approach V. Conclusions Simulations of a generic high-lift geometry were carried out using the Lattice Boltzmann based code PowerFLOW with the framework of the 1st AIAA CFD High Lift Prediction Workshop held in 2010. The results shown here were the only unsteady simulations among all workshop participants and show excellent agreement of drag and lift forces as well as cp distributions for all workshop cases. Good predictions in the region of maximum lift were a particularly distinguishing feature of the Lattice Boltzmann simulations, indicating the importance of unsteady simulations in correctly capturing strongly separated flow structures. The slight over-prediction of cL,max observed for the baseline case was shown to be largely attributable to the absence of slat and flap brackets in the simulations. Adding these brackets (Case 3 of the workshop) shows a significant reduction of lift in particular at the higher angle of attack, bringing the simulation results to almost perfect agreement with measured results. The effect of changing flap angles was also well captured by the simulations. The position of laminar-to-turbulence transition was set for most of the simulations presented here based on published experimental results since the method used for the current study uses a wall model rather than fully resolving the boundary layer. Fully turbulent simulations were carried out for selected configurations and showed a significant reduction of lift. In addition to the workshop cases a study of wind tunnel blockage effects is shown here. Adding walls in the simulation corresponding to the dimensions of the wind tunnel led to a change of predicted forces consistent with the corrections applied to the experimental results. Computational times required for the unsteady simulations were generally in the same order of magnitude or even slightly below as the RANS simulations presented by other workshop participants, confirming the high level of efficiency of the unsteady Lattice Boltzmann method. Overall, this method was shown to be an interesting and viable alternative to the predominantly used RANS methods for the simulation of high-lift wings. 本篇文章的结论也相对较长,统计结果为 329 个单词,包含 4 个段落 第 1 段概括了文章的的主要研究内容。 第 2 段对文章中的使用的计算方法中的laminar-to-turbulence transition 进行了说明。 第 3 段文章中的使用的计算方法中的一点(Adding walls in the simulation)进行了说明。 第 4 段对文章的计算效率进行了说明。进一步说明文章方法的优越性。 主要时态为一般现在时态 第第 5 篇篇 题目: Design of a

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论