译文.docx

R175柴油机机体加工自动线上带CAD图

收藏

资源目录
跳过导航链接。
R175柴油机机体加工自动线上带CAD图.zip
R175柴油机机体加工自动线上
binbin
GB_圆柱螺旋压缩弹簧(两端圈并紧)_2_28_2.5_38.sldprt
GB_圆柱螺旋压缩弹簧(两端圈并紧)_4_28_3_35.sldprt
GB_直齿圆柱外齿轮_2_160_20_10_240.sldprt
GB_直齿圆柱外齿轮_2_31_20_10_36.sldprt
GB_直齿锥齿轮_2_20_20_10_20_5.sldprt
YY_CA液压缸_B32-100-0.0001.sldprt
YY_CA液压缸_B40-100-0.0001.sldprt
YY_轴用YX密封圈_32.sldprt
Y卡套式端直通管接头_G(25)-6.sldprt
卡套式锥螺纹端对接直通管接头_6.sldprt
三维图
回转工作台
GB_直齿圆柱外齿轮_2_160_20_10_240.sldprt
GB_直齿圆柱外齿轮_2_31_20_10_36.sldprt
M4X12-N.SLDPRT
M4X14-N.SLDPRT
M5X16-N.SLDPRT
M6X16-N.SLDPRT
M6X18-N.SLDPRT
内六角头螺钉M6X16-N.SLDPRT
双列圆柱滚子轴承 NN 3016 GB 285-94.SLDPRT
双列圆柱滚子轴承NN 3011 GB 285-94.SLDPRT
双列圆柱滚子轴承NN 3020 GB 285-94.SLDPRT
回转台装配体2.SLDASM
圆螺母M42X1.5-N.SLDPRT
圆螺母M52X1.5-N.SLDPRT
圆螺母M65X2-N.SLDPRT
弹性挡圈28.SLDPRT
箱体.SLDPRT
螺栓M6X18-N.SLDPRT
装配体1.SLDASM
轴1.SLDPRT
轴1下压盖.SLDPRT
轴1衬套.SLDPRT
轴1轴承压盖.SLDPRT
轴1轴承套圈.SLDPRT
轴1锥齿轮卡套.SLDPRT
轴1隔套.SLDPRT
轴2.SLDPRT
轴2下压盖.SLDPRT
轴2压盖.SLDPRT
轴承7208 GB 292-94.SLDPRT
轴承NU206E GB 283-94.SLDPRT
零件1.SLDPRT
零件11.SLDPRT
零件12.SLDPRT
零件13.SLDPRT
零件14.SLDPRT
齿轮压板.SLDPRT
液压机械手
50x20垫板.SLDPRT
M3X20-N.SLDPRT
M5X16-Simplified.SLDPRT
M6X25-N.SLDPRT
M6X30-N.SLDPRT
M6X35-N.SLDPRT
M6X40-N.SLDPRT
O型圈10x2.65.SLDPRT
O型圈8x2.65-A.SLDPRT
Y型密封圈20X10X6.3 L1.SLDPRT
Y型密封圈20X4X5 L1.SLDPRT
伸缩缸前盖.SLDPRT
伸缩缸活塞.SLDPRT
伸缩缸轴.SLDPRT
叶片.SLDPRT
回转台.SLDPRT
回转缸前板.SLDPRT
回转缸后盖.SLDPRT
回转缸固定片.SLDPRT
回转缸外圈.SLDPRT
回转轴.SLDPRT
固定销.SLDPRT
垫圈 8.SLDPRT
垫板.SLDPRT
带螺纹孔销 6X24-N.SLDPRT
带螺纹端盖.SLDPRT
底板.SLDPRT
开口销 6.3X40.SLDPRT
开口销4.SLDPRT
开槽圆螺母 M8 .SLDPRT
弹性垫圈 6.SLDPRT
手爪.SLDPRT
挡盖.SLDPRT
摆动缸连接板.SLDPRT
标准轴承6005 .SLDPRT
活塞杆.SLDPRT
液压缸固定杆.SLDPRT
耳环.SLDPRT
臂.SLDPRT
螺母 M10-N.SLDPRT
螺母 M6-N.SLDPRT
螺母 M8-N.SLDPRT
螺母M12-N.SLDPRT
螺母M16-N.SLDPRT
装配体1.SLDASM
调节片.SLDPRT
转动销.SLDPRT
轴承 6005 .SLDPRT
轴承 6009 .SLDPRT
轴承6005.SLDPRT
轴承挡盖.SLDPRT
轴瓦.SLDPRT
轴用弹性挡圈 25.SLDPRT
连接板.SLDPRT
铰接头.SLDPRT
铰接杆.SLDPRT
铰接活塞头.SLDPRT
铰链固定板.SLDPRT
铰链板.SLDPRT
销20 180.SLDPRT
销20X50.SLDPRT
销30150.SLDPRT
销4X20.SLDPRT
销6X24.SLDPRT
销轴16X30.SLDPRT
销轴30X100.SLDPRT
销轴4X30.SLDPRT
键12X28.SLDPRT
键6X20.SLDPRT
二维图
回转工作台.dwg
改进.dwl
改进.dwl2
液压机械手.dwg
液压油路图
11.idx
11.lib
液压油路图.exb
科技译文
说明书
零件图
伸缩缸活塞.SLDDRW
回转缸前板.SLDDRW
回转缸后盖.SLDDRW
回转缸固定片.SLDDRW
回转缸外圈.SLDDRW
挡盖.SLDDRW
耳环.SLDDRW
轴1下压盖.SLDDRW
轴1轴承压盖.SLDDRW
轴1轴承套圈.SLDDRW
连接板.SLDDRW
铰链板.SLDDRW
齿轮压板.SLDDRW
压缩包内文档预览:
预览图 预览图 预览图 预览图 预览图
编号:22018914    类型:共享资源    大小:22.58MB    格式:ZIP    上传时间:2019-09-16 上传人:QQ24****1780 IP属地:浙江
50
积分
关 键 词:
r175 柴油机 机体 加工 自动 线上 cad
资源描述:
R175柴油机机体加工自动线上带CAD图,r175,柴油机,机体,加工,自动,线上,cad
内容简介:
A Cutter Orientation Modification Method for the Reduction of Non-linearity Errors in Five-Axis CNC MachiningABSTRACTIn the machining of sculptured surfaces,five-axis CNC machine tools provide more flexibility to realize the cutter position as its axis orientation spatially changes .Conventional five-axis machining uses straight line segments to connect consecutive machining data points ,and uses linear interpolation to generate command signals for positions between end points,Due to five-axis simultaneous and coupled rotary and linear movements, the actual machining motion trajectory is a non-linear path. The non-linear curve segments deviate from the linearly interpolated straight line segments, resulting in a non-linearity machining error in each machining step. These non-linearity errors, in addition to linearity error, commonly create obstacles to the assurance of high machining precision. In this paper, a novel methodology for solving the non-linearity errors problem in five-axis CNC machining is presented. The propose method is based on the machine type-specific kinematics and the machining motion trajectory. Non-linearity errors are reduced by modifying the cutter orientations without inserting additional machining data points. An off-line processing of a set of tool path data for machining a sculptured surface illustrates that the proposed method increases machining precision. KeywordNon-linear error; Machine kinematics; Machining motion trajectory. INTRODUCTIONIn conventional five-axis machining, a tool path, represented by the cutter locations data (CLDATA), consists of the spatially varying cutter positions and its axis orientations. These CLDATA are generated based solely on the geometrical properties of the machined surfaces and the cutter. These CLDATA are further processed into NC-codes which is specific to a particular machine configuration. Linear interpolation is then used to generate the required commands for positions along line segment connecting the machining data points. The simultaneous linear and rotary movements are involved in five-axis machining since ever new cutter axis orientation requires the motion at least one other axis. There are also coupling effects of the cutter axis will affect the position of the cutter. These simultaneous and coupled movements cause the cutter contract point (CC point) to move in a non-linear manner. As a result, the machining error in each motion step is made up of not only the linear segmentation approximation error but also an additional machining error. As shown in figure 1 for machining is either a concave surface or a convex surface, a line segment is used to connect two consecutive machining data points (the spindle chunk is the machine control point MCP). Linear interpolation generate intermediate positions along the line segment. The desire surface is design curve(either concave or convex). The linear segment approximates to design curve resulting in the linearity error,t. Apart from the linearity error . The non-linear CC point trajectory deviates from the straight line segment (the cutter gage length is constant and MCP is interpolated along the line segment)result in an additional machining error, referred to as the non-linearity error, n. In the case that the desire surface is concave(see figure 1a), the total machining error is difference of the non-linearity error and the linearity error : total=t-n. The non-linearity error, in this case, compensate for the total machining error(AIGP Post-processor,1996;Liu,1994). On the contrary, for the machining of convex surface as shown in figure 1b, the non-linearity error adds onto the linearity error and enlarges the machining error: total=t+n(AIGP Post-processor,1996;Liu,1994). figure1. The multi-axis CNC machining errorConsequently the non-linearity error have caused difficulties for ensuring ultra-precision machining requirements. In the machining of airfoil surface, for example, the machining of the contour surface of airfoil to the edges is problematic. The surface curvature on these area changes abruptly, and thus the cutter orientation varies inconsistently from one cutter to the next. These abrupt cutter orientation variations inconsistently from one cutter location to the next .These abrupt cutter orientation are a typical non-linearity error problem.In order to solve the five-axis CNC machining error problem, efforts have been made to treat non-linearity errors in generate NC codes. Some researchers and postprocessor producers used “linearization processes” for this purpose. The basic function of “linearization processes ” are inserting machining data points between NC codes where the total machining error is out of the specified tolerance range. Takeuchi et al. (1990) inserted points by subdividing the line segment with equally space d interval. Cho et al. (1993) inserted data points by limiting the maximum machining error within the line interval from the start point to the inserted point to be the tolerance. And, both of them set the cutter orientations varying linearly in successive positions. In the Automation Intelligence Generalization Postprocessor (AIGP)(1996), a “linearization processes ” calculates the middle point (MP) between adjacent NC-codes and inserts the MP as an additional data in the NC code. The insertion can be performed further between the consecutive NC-coded until either all points are within the machining tolerance or until a maximum of 63 points are inserted between the consecutive data point. The current post-processors, such as the Vanguard Custom Post-processor Generator (1996) , the Ominimill Custom Postprocessor(1992),the AIX Numerical Control Post Generator(1996) , are all having the similar “linearization processes ” as in the AIGP. In the current CAD/CAM software. Unigraphics(2001), the UG /post postprocessors inserts data points between adjacent NC-codes, thereby simulating a straight line with series of small curves. The number of the inserted points is determined based on the maximum allowable deviation and an iteration method is used to segment the move. In the extreme case, namely after looping 20 times, if the deviation between the segmented arcs and the line are still out of the specified tolerance limit, the process is aborted. “linearization processes ” discussed above manipulate NC-codes by inserting extra machining data points. Although the produced NC-codes satisfy the machining requirement, they may contain dense sets of non-equally spaced data with constant or linearly varying cutter orientation. Consequently, the linearization process has raised the following problems. In the machining of complex contour surface, the cutter orientation varies from one cutter location to the next. The cutter position changes in this case can not be too small since the machine will produce either jerk motion or random rotary movements. As in an industrial procedure of machining airfoil surface of an impeller, a linearization process was used to reduce the non-linearity errors. Many data points were inserted between a pair of NC-codes. The insertion of many data points caused the cutter position change to be nearly equal to zero while the cutter orientation changed abruptly. As a consequence, the machine rotary movements were rapid with infinite feedrate. Random rotary movements resulted and the workpiece was damaged. The insertion of machining data points can also cause non-constant federate along the cutting curve. The insertion of additional data results in non-equally spaced segment, while acceleration and deceleration steps are required for each segment. Thus, the feederate varies in each segment and may never reach the desired value. The result of varying feederate causes a nonsmooth surface finish and the unreachable feedrate increases overall machining time. In addition, the insertion of constant cutter orientation variation also causes severe roughness around the end points along the surface. Linearly inaccurately since the change in cutter orientation is not necessarily linear. The non-linearity error problem arises from the fact that five-axis machining motion trajectories are non-linear curve segments. The simultaneous and coupled rotary and translation movements generate the non-linearity motion trajectory, and the linear interpolation technique is not capable to curve fit the nonlinear path. One solution to is to design new interpolation methods. Liang et al.(2002)presented a combine 3D linear and circular (3D L&C) interpolation technique. The new 3D L&C interpolation can on-line drive the rotation movement pivot along a pre-designed 3D curve path, so that the CC point motion trajectory is a via a straight line connecting machining data points, thus, the non-linearity error can be eliminated. Five-axis machining movements are kinematically related to the cutter location data. In other word, the non-linear motion trajectory depends on the cutter orientation changes and non-linearity errors are related to the tool path generation. Thus, another solution to the non-linearity error problem can be approached from tool path(CLDATA)generation with the requirements that the machining errors are minimized and there is no interference between the workpiece and the cutter. In tool path generation, various techniques for different surface representations have been used by the CAD/CAM package producers (CLDATA,1996;Unigraphics, 1990)and researchers. Huang and Oliver (1992) . Bedi et al.(1997) presented a principle curvature alignment technique for five-axis machining using a toroidal shaped tool. Liu (1995)presented the single point offset and the double point offset algorithms for five-axis flank milling tool path generation based on differential geometry and analytical geometry. Morishge et al.(1999)presented a tool path generation method for five-axis CNC machining, which applies the C-space(a 3D configuration space)to determine collision-free cutter positions and its orientation. These research work on tool path generation are all based exclusively on the geometric of the machined surfaces and the cutter, without considering the machining-specific machining kinematics. As a result, the generated tool paths(the machining NC-codes transformed from these CLDATA)commonly cause obstacles for meeting the ultra-precision machining requirements, particularly for the cutter orientation generation in five-axis machining. Thus, the problem with present off-line tool path generation approaches is that the real machining kinematics is not directly incorporated. To ensure machining precision, cutter orientation generation should be based not only on the geometry of the machined surfaces but also on the machine type-specific kinematics. In this paper, a novel methodology for solving the non-linearity error problem in five-axis machining is presented. The method optimizes the CLDATA based on machine-specific kinematics and machining motion trajectory, whereby the cutter orientations are modified to reduce the non-linearity errors provided that there is no interference between the cutter and the workpiece. A software program for implementing the proposed method is presented. As an application of proposed method, a case study is presented, which shows an increase in machining precision as compared with those processed by the existing AIGPs method.PROPOSED TOOL PATH GENERATION METHODThe machining non-linearity errors depend upon the actual CC point trajectory, since a CC point trajectory is a function of the machine rotary variables, each actual CC point trajectory can be manipulated within the tolerance limit by changing the machine rotary variables, provided that there is no interference between the workpiece and the cutter. Further more, because of the machine rotary variables are kinematically related to the cutter orientation changes, the non-linearity error problem can be approached by manipulating cutter orientations. To proposed method reduces the non-linearity errors by determining the acceptable machine rotary variables employing the machine motion trajectory model, and by modifying the cutter orientation through the machine kinematic relations. It must be emphasized that the machine kinematic properties and motion trajectory are machine type-specific. Hence, the modification of CLDATA has to be carried out in teams of machine variables and subsequent use of the kinematic transformation to determine the modified CLDATA.The procedure of the proposed method starts with the transformation of the CLDATA to machining NC-codes by employing the machine-type specific inverse kinematic model. In teams of machine variables, the actual machining motion trajectory is determined by using the specific machine motion trajectory model. Then, the machining errors are determined. The linearity error is a function of surface local curvature on the cutting curve and the step-forward distance. From the cubic spline cutting curve function, the surface local curvature can be determined. The linearity error for each move then can be computed from the adjacent CC point data and the surface local curvature. By knowing the linearity error, the allowable non-linearity error can be determined as the difference of the linearity error from the specified machining tolerance. Using the machine trajectory model and the line segment equation, the maximum deviation can be determined. By taking sample points on both of the CC non-linear curve and the line segments, the maximum chord deviation is the maximum non-linearity error. In the steps where the maximum non-linearity error exceeds the allowable non-linearity error, the proposed method modifies the machine rotary variable changes. The modification is carried out by increasing/decreasing a machine rotary variable variation a small angle in the plane containing the two original cutter vectors, and by adding/subtracting the angle to the original machine rotary variables. The new rotary variables are then used to calculate the resultant non-linearity error, which in turn is compared again with the allowable non-linearity error. Thus, by using the difference between the allowable non-linearity error and modified non-linearity error as the criterion, the acceptable machine rotary variables can be determined iteratively. Finally, from the modified machine rotary variables, the corresponding cutter orientations can be determined by performing the forward kinematic transformation. In order to avoid interference between the workpiece and the cutter, the rotary angles were adjusted such that the angle changes are less than half of the orientation angle changes are less than one half of the original cutter orientation changes. Comparing to the existing “linearization processes ”, the additional data points are inserted with cutter orientations either varying linearly or as the average variation(i.e., the one half)of the rotary angle change, and the interference problem is not considered. Alternatively, the modified machine rotary variables angle change from the proposed method are smaller than one half of angel change, which thus ensures the corresponding cutter orientation are within the range such that no interference occurs. For a set of CLDATA, the modification procedure can be performed by using the following algorithm.TOOL PATH MODIFICATION ALGORITHM1. Transform the initial CLDATA, into its corresponding machining NC-codes by using the specific machine inverse kinematic model;2. Determine the CC point coordinates by employing the machine motion trajectory model;3. Compute the desire tool path by using cubic spline function based on the CLDATA and calculate the local surface curvatures Kf of the tool path at the machining points;4. Computer the linearity error by using the formula given by Faux and Pratt(1979):t =1/8 Kf (s)2where, Kf-the surface local curvature determined from step(3); s-the segment length between consecutive CC points from step(2).5. Compute the allowable value of the non-linearity error: a,n=tolerance-t.6. Determined the points on the straight line segment and on the machine motion trajectory segment that correspond to the maximum chordal deviation.7. Compute the maximum non-linearity error , max, using the points from step(6);8. Modify the machine rotary angle change ifmaxa,n ,that is, increase or decreaseBm andCm such that the non-linearity error, n1, will satisfy (n1-a,n)0;9. Computer the machining NC-codes of Bm,i+1 and Cm,i+1 based on the machine rotary angle variation from step 8:Bm,i+1= Bm,iBmCm,i+1=Cm,iCmWhere, Bm,i, Cm,i are the i-th rotary variables , Bm,i+1 Cm,i+1 are the i+1-th rotary variables andBm Cm are modified rotary angle changes. The +and sign depends on whether the angles in step i+1 increase or decrease,10. Determine the optimum cutter orientations b
温馨提示:
1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
2: 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
3.本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
提示  人人文库网所有资源均是用户自行上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作他用。
关于本文
本文标题:R175柴油机机体加工自动线上带CAD图
链接地址:https://www.renrendoc.com/p-22018914.html

官方联系方式

2:不支持迅雷下载,请使用浏览器下载   
3:不支持QQ浏览器下载,请用其他浏览器   
4:下载后的文档和图纸-无水印   
5:文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰   
关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

网站客服QQ:2881952447     

copyright@ 2020-2025  renrendoc.com 人人文库版权所有   联系电话:400-852-1180

备案号:蜀ICP备2022000484号-2       经营许可证: 川B2-20220663       公网安备川公网安备: 51019002004831号

本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知人人文库网,我们立即给予删除!