PRISMA-P中英文版

精品文档 1欢迎下载 PRISMA PPRISMA P preferred preferred reportingreporting itemsitems forfor systematicsystematic reviewreview andand meta analysismeta analysis protocols protocols 20152015 checklist checklist recommendedrecommended itemsitems toto addressinaddressin a a systematicsystematic reviewreview protocolprotocol SectionSection andand topictopic ItemItem NoNo ChecklistitemChecklistitem AdministrativeAdministrative informationinformation Title Identification1aIdentify the report as a protocol of a systematic review Update1b If the protocol is for an update of a previous systematic review identify as such Registration2 If registered provide the name of the registry such as PROSPERO and registration number Authors Contact3a Provide name institutional affiliation e mail address of all protocol authors provide physical mailing address of corresponding author Contributions3b Describe contributions of protocol authors and identify the 精品文档 2欢迎下载 guarantor of the review Amendments4 If the protocol represents an amendment of a previously completed or published protocol identify as such and list changes otherwise state plan for documenting important protocol amendments Support Sources5a Indicate sources of financial or other support for the review Sponsor5bProvide name for the review funder and or sponsor Role of sponsor or funder 5c Describe roles of funder s sponsor s and or institution s if any in developing the protocol IntroductionIntroduction Rationale6 Describe the rationale for the review in the context of what is already known a Objectives7 Provide an explicit statement of the question s the review will address with reference to participants interventions comparators and outcomes PICO 精品文档 3欢迎下载 MethodsMethods Eligibility criteria 8 Specify the study characteristics such as PICO study design setting time frame and report characteristics such as years considered language publication status to be used as criteria for eligibility for the review Information sources 9 Describe all intended information sources such as electronic databases contact with study authors trial registers or other grey literature sources with planned dates of coverage Search strategy10 Present draft of search strategy to be used for at least one electronic database including planned limits such that it could be repeated Study records Data management11a Describe the mechanism s that will be used to manage records and data throughout the review Selection process11b State the process that will be used for selecting studies such as two independent reviewers through each phase of the review that is screening eligibility and inclusion in meta analysis 精品文档 4欢迎下载 Data collection process 11c Describe planned method of extracting data from reports such as piloting forms done independently in duplicate any processes for obtaining and confirming data from investigators Data items12 List and define all variables for which data wil lbe sought such as PICOitems funding sources any pre planned data assumptions and simplifications Outcomes and prioritization 13 List and define all outcomes for which data will be sought including prioritization of main and additional outcomes with rationale Risk of bias in individual studies 14 Describe anticipated methods for assessing risk of bias of individual studies including whether this will be done at the outcome or study level or both state how this information will be used in data synthesis 15a Describe criteria under which study data will be quantitatively synthesised Data synthesis 15b If data are appropriatefor quantitative synthesis describe planned summary measures methods of handling data and methods of combining data from studies including any planned exploration of consistency such as I2 Kendall s 精品文档 5欢迎下载 15c Describe any proposed additional analyses such as sensitivity or subgroup analyses meta regression 15d If quantitative synthesisis not appropriate describe the type of summary planned Meta bias es 16 Specify any planned assessment of meta bias es such as publication bias across studies selective reporting within studies Confidence in cumulative evidence 17 Describe how the strength of the body of evidence will be assessed such as GRADE 中文翻译版 PRISMA PPRISMA P 20152015 清单清单 系统综述和荟萃分析计划书优先报告系统综述和荟萃分析计划书优先报告 适用于系统评价计划书的推荐条目适用于系统评价计划书的推荐条目 章节和主题章节和主题 条目条目 编号编号 清单条目清单条目 管理信息管理信息 标题 精品文档 6欢迎下载 识别 1a 从标题可以识别报告是系统评价的计划书 更新 1b 从标题可以识别计划书是对之前发表的的系统评价进行更新 注册 2 如果已经注册 请提供注册处和注册号 作者 联系 3a 提供参与计划书的所有作者姓名 所属机构单位 以及邮箱 提供通讯作者的 详细通讯地址 贡献 3b 描述计划书中各个作者的贡献 并且明确担保人 修正 4 如果该计划书是对之前已完成或已发表的计划书的修正 请确认并列出修改 清单 否则 阐述记录计划书重大修正的计划 支持 来源 5a 标明资金来源或其它支持 赞助 5b 提供资助者姓名或者赞助商名称 资助者或赞 助商的角色 5c 如果资助者 赞助商和 或机构参与计划书其中 请描述他们的角色 介绍介绍 论据 6 在已知的背景下陈述该系统评价的立题依据 目标 7 根据人群 干预 对照和结局 PICO 对系统评价的研究问题进行明确清晰 的阐述 方法方法 精品文档 7欢迎下载 纳入标准 8 明确系统评价纳入研究的特点 比如 PICO 研究设计 试验场所 时间点 以及其他研究报告特点 比如发表年代 语种 发表状态 信息来源 9 描述所有的信息来源 比如电子数据库 联系作者 注册试验或者其他灰色 文献 以及计划检索的时间范围 检索策略 10 请起草至少一个数据库的检索策略以及相应的限制策略 从而保证检索是可 以重复的 研究报告 数据处理 11a 描述系统评价过程中处理记录和数据的方法 研究选择 11b 描述文献筛选过程 比如两个研究人员独立筛选 以及系统评价中研究帅选 的每一个过程 也就是 文献筛查 合格研究以及最终纳入定量合成研究 数据收集 11c 描述数据提取方法 比如预先设计的数据提取表 独立完成 一式两份 以 及其它任何从研究者那里获取和确认数据的过程 数据条目 12 列出并定义所有数据变量 比如 PICO 条目 基金来源 以及任何计划前进行 的数据假定和简化 结局和次序 13 列出并定义所有结局指标 并给出主要结局和其他结局指标的优先次序和相 应理由 偏倚风险 14 描述评价单个研究偏倚风险的方法 并说明其在数据分析中的作用 15a 描述将对哪些研究数据进行定量分析 数据分析 15b 如