2022年份考研英语阅读学习资料分析

2022年份考研英语阅读学习资料分析

每门学科都有其特点，英语考研，需要多背多记多练，下面我给

大家带来关于英语阅读学习资料分析，便利大家学习，期望会对大家

的工作与学习有所关怀。

考研英语阅读理解精

（一）法律类

Byalmosteverymeasure,PaulPfingstisanunsentimental

prosecutor.LastweektheSanDiegoCountydistrictattorney

saidhefullyintendstotrysuspectCharlesAndrewWilliams,

15,asanadultfortheSantanaHighSchoolshootings.Even

beforethetragedy,Pfingsthadstoodbehindthecontroversial

Californialawthatmandatestreatingmurdersuspectsasyoung

as14asadults.

SonobodywouldhavewageredthatPfingstwouldalsobethe

firstD.A.intheU.S.tolaunchhisveryownInnocenceProject.

YetlastJune,Pfingsttoldhisattorneystogobackoverold

murderandrapeconvictionsandseeifanyunravelwithnewly

developedDNA-testingtools.Inotherwords,hewantedto

revisitpastvictories-thistimeplayingfortheotherteam.

Ithinkpeoplemisunderstandbeingconservativeforbeing

biased,saysPfingst.Iconsidermyselfapragmaticguy,and

Ihavenointerestinputtinginnocentpeopleinjail.

第1页

AroundtheU.S.,flabbergasteddefenseattorneysandtheir

jailedclientscheeredhismove.Amongprosecutors,however,

therewasanawkwardpause.Afterall,eachDNAtestcostsas

muchas$5,000.Thentherestheunspokenrisk:ifdozensof

innocentsturnup,theD.A.willhaveindictedhisshop.

Butninemonthslater,nobudgetshavebeenbustedor

prosecutorsousted.Onlytherarecasemeritsreview.Pfingsts

teamconsidersconvictionsbefore1993,whenthecitystarted

routineDNAtesting.Theydiscardcasesifthedefendanthas

beenreleased.Ofthe560remainingfiles,theyhave

re-examined200,lookingforcaseswithbiologicalevidenceand

defendantswhostillclaiminnocence.

Theyhaveidentifiedthreesofar.Themostcompelling

involvesamanserving12yearsformolestingagirlwhowas

playinginhisapartment.Butotherswerethereatthetime.

Policefoundasmalldropofsalivaonthevictimsshirt-too

smallasampletotestin1991.Todaythatspotcouldfreea

man.Testresultsaredueanyday.InspiredbySanDiego,10

othercountiesintheU.S.arestartingDNAaudits.

ByAmandaRipleyeznciscosijevicrtwel1;LisaMcLaughlin;

JosephPierro;JoshTyrangielandSoraSong

本文习题命题仿照对象2022年真题

第2页

1.HowdidPfingstcarryouthisownInnocenceProject?

[A]Bygettingridofhisbiasagainstthesuspects.

[B]Byrevisitingthepastvictories.

[C]ByusingthenewlydevelopedDNA-testingtools.

[D]Byhiscooperationwithhisattorneys.

2.WhichofthefollowingcanbeanadvantageofInnocence

Project?

[A]Tohelpcorrectthewrongjudgments.

[B]Toousttheunqualifiedprosecutors.

[C]Tomaketheprosecutorsinanawkwardsituation.

[D]Tocheerupthedefenseattorneysandtheirjailed

clients.

3.Theexpression“flabbergasted"(Line1,Paragraph3)

mostprobablymeans.

[A]excited

[B]competent

[C]embarrassed

[D]astounded

4.WhywasPfingstanunsentimentalprosecutor?

[A]Heintendedtotryafifteen-yearoldsuspect.

[B]Hehadnointerestinputtingtheinnocentinjail.

[C]HesupportedthecontroversialCalifornialaw.

第3页

[D]Hewantedtotrysuspectasyoungasfourteen.

5.Whichofthefollowingisnottrueaccordingtothetext?

[A]Pfingst*smovedidn'thaveagreatcoverage.

[B]Pfingst'smovehadboththepositiveandnegative

effect.

[C]Pfingst'smovedidn,tworkwell.

[D]Pfingst,smovegreatlyencouragedthejailedprisoners.

篇章剖析

本文承受的是记叙文的模式。第一段指出芬斯特作为一位铁面无

私的检查官的一些做法;其次段指出芬斯特实施“清白预备〃的预备

及做法;第三段指出实施“清白预备〃造成的反响以及可能存在的问

题;第四段和第五段是实施“清白预备〃的结果和影响。

词汇解释

prosecutor[5prRsIkju:tE(r)]n.检察官，检察员，起诉人，原

告

controversial[kRntrE5v\:F(E)l]adj.争辩的，争议的

mandate[5mAndeIt]v.批准制订一个训令，如通过法律;发布指

令或要求：

wager[5weIdVE(r)]v.下赌注，保证

conviction[kEn5vIkF(E)n]n.定罪，宣告有罪

unravel[Qn5rAv(E)1]v.说明，解决

flabbergast[5flAbE'B:st;(?@)」Ast]v.口使大吃一惊,哑然

第4页

失色，使目瞪口呆

第5页

indict[In5dalt]v.起诉,控告，指控，揭露

bust[bQst]v.破产或缺钱

oust[ajst]v.剥夺，取代，驱除

discard[dI5skB:d]v.抛开;遗弃;废弃

molest[mE51est]v..,困扰，调戏

saliva[sE51aIvE]n.口水，唾液

难句突破

1.Evenbeforethetragedy,Pfingsthadstoodbehindthe

controversialCalifornialawthatmandatestreatingmurder

suspectsasyoungas14asadults.

主体句式：•,,Pfingsthadstoodbehind

构造分析：Evenbeforethetragedy是本句的时间状语；主句

是Pfingsthadstoodbehind,**;that引导的宾语从句修饰law;在

从句中，as-as是一词组，意思是“和…一样〃；毁灭的第三个as

是介词，意思是“作为〃。

句子译文：甚至在这场悲剧发生之前芬斯特就支持加利福尼亚州

的一项颇有争议的法律。这项法律规定，以成人身份受审的谋杀嫌疑

犯的最低年龄可以降到十四岁。

题目分析

1.答案为C,属事实详情题。文中对应信息“Pfingsttoldhis

attorneystogobackoveroldmurderandrapeconvictionsand

seeifanyunravelwithnewlydevelopedDNA-testing

第5页

tools."是对其次段第一句的补充说明。

2.答案为A,属推理推断题。从上下文我们可以得知，实施“清

白预备〃就是使用先进的DNA技术来重新审理过去的案件当中可能

存在的冤案错案。

3.答案为D,属猜词题。从其次段第一句话我们得知芬斯特可能

是美国第一个实施特殊独特的“清白预备〃的人，因此他的做法很可

能是令人感到惊异的，从而可猜出该词的含义。

4.答案为B,属推理推断题。从第一段和其次段给出的事例我们

可以看出，芬斯特不愿放过任何一个犯罪的人，即便他的年龄还不算

大;他也不愿使无辜者蒙冤，即便案件已经审理。

5.答案为C,属推理推断题。正由于"Pfingst'smoveworks

well",美国才又有“tenothercountiesarestartingDNA

audits“，而且，"nobudgetshavebeenbustedorprosecutors

ousted".

考研英语真题一一18阅读最难篇

Passage3

Sciencehaslonghadanuneasyrelationshipwithother

aspectsofculture.ThinkofGal1ileos17th-centurytrialfor

hisrebellingbeliefbeforetheCatholicChurchofpoetWilliam

BlakesharshremarksagainstthemechanisticworldviewofIsaac

Newton.Theschismbetweenscienceandthehumanitieshas,

ifanything,deepenedinthiscentury.

第6页

Untilrecently,thescientificcommunitywassopowerful

thatitcouldaffordtoignoreitscriticsbutnolonger.As

fundingforsciencehasdeclined,scientistshaveattacked

“antiscience"inseveralbooks,notablyHigherSuperstition,

byPaulR.Gross,abiologistattheUniversityofVirginia,

andNormanLevitt,amathematicianatRutgersUniversity;and

TheDemon-HauntedWorld,byCarSaganofCornel1University.

Defendersofsciencehavealsovoicedtheirconcernsat

meetingssuchas“TheFlightfromScienceandReason,field

inNewYorkCityinl995,and“ScienceintheAge

of(Mis)information,"whichassembledlastJunenearBuffalo.

Antiscienceclearlymeansdifferentthingstodifferent

people.GrossandLevittfindfaultprimarilywithsociologists,

philosophersandotheracademicswhohavequestionedsciences

objectivity.Saganismoreconcernedwiththosewhobelievein

ghosts,creationismandotherphenomenathatcontradictthe

scientificworldview.

Asurveyofnewsstoriesinl996revealsthattheantiscience

taghasbeenattachedtomanyothergroupsaswell,from

authoritieswhoadvocatedtheeliminationofthelastremaining

第7页

stocksofsmallpoxvirustoRepublicanswhoadvocated

decreasedfundingforbasicresearch.

FewwoulddisputethatthetermappliestotheUnabomber,

whosemanifesto,publishedinl995,scornsscienceandlongsfor

returntoapretechnologicalutopia.Butsurelythatdoesnot

meanenvironmentalistsconcernedaboutuncontrolled

industrialgrowthareantiscience,asanessayinUSNewsWorld

ReportlastMayseemedtosuggest.

Theenvironmentalists,inevitably,respondtosuchcritics.

Thetrueenemiesofscience,arguesPaulEhrlichofStanford

University,apioneerofenvironmentalstudies,arethosewho

questiontheevidencesupportingglobalwarming,thedepletion

ofth