2026年雅思写作高分策略及模拟试题集

2026年雅思写作高分策略及模拟试题集Task1(学术类)题型：图表描述题量：3题每题分数：9分1.图表描述题（线图+饼图组合）题目：ThefollowinglinegraphandpiechartshowthechangesinthenumberofinternationaltouristsvisitingthreeEuropeancountries(France,Germany,andItaly)from2010to2020,andtheproportionoftourists'spendingineachcountryin2020,respectively.LineGraph:Thelinegraphillustratestheannualnumberofinternationaltourists(inmillions)toFrance,Germany,andItalyovertheten-yearperiodfrom2010to2020.PieChart:Thepiechartbreaksdowntheexpenditureproportions(inpercentage)oftourists'spendingineachcountryin2020.要求：Summarizethemainfeaturesofthedatapresentedinthelinegraphandpiechart.Makecomparisonswhererelevant.答案：ThelinegraphandpiechartprovideinsightsintothetrendsofinternationaltourismandspendingpatternsinFrance,Germany,andItalybetween2010and2020.Intermsoftouristarrivals,Franceconsistentlyattractedthehighestnumberofinternationalvisitorsthroughoutthedecade.ThenumberoftouriststoFrancepeakedat85millionin2020,significantlyexceedingthoseinGermany(55million)andItaly(40million).Germanyrecordedsteadygrowth,risingfrom35millionin2010to60millionin2020,whileItaly’stouristnumbersremainedrelativelystable,fluctuatingbetween30millionand45million.Notably,FranceandGermanyshowedfastergrowthcomparedtoItaly,whichexperiencedslowerexpansion.Regardingspendingproportions,asdepictedinthepiechart,touristsinFranceallocatedthelargestshareoftheirbudgetstoaccommodation(30%),followedbyfoodanddining(25%)andtransportation(20%).Incontrast,Germantouristsspentmoreonsouvenirs(25%)andactivities(20%),whileItaliantouristsprioritizedlocalcuisine(30%)andshopping(25%).Germanystoodoutasthecountrywheretouristsspentthehighestpercentageonsouvenirs,whereasFranceandItalyweremorefocusedondiningandaccommodation.Overall,Franceemergedasthemostpopulardestinationintermsoftouristvolumeandspendingonaccommodation,whileGermanyattractedmorespendingonsouvenirs,andItalywaspreferredforitscuisineandshopping.Thedatahighlightsregionaldifferencesintourismtrendsandconsumerpreferences.2.图表描述题（柱状图+表格组合）题目：Thebarchartcomparestheannualaveragerainfall(inmillimeters)infourcoastalcities(Sydney,Tokyo,London,andNewYork)from2015to2019,whilethetableprovidesinformationonthemainindustriescontributingtoeachcity’seconomyin2019.BarChart:ThebarchartdisplaystherainfalldataforSydney,Tokyo,London,andNewYorkoverfiveyears.Table:Thetableliststhetopthreeeconomicsectors(tourism,finance,andtechnology)andtheirpercentagecontributionstoeachcity’sGDPin2019.要求：Describethekeyfeaturesofthebarchartandtable.Compareandcontrastthedatawherenecessary.答案：ThebarchartandtableofferacomparativeanalysisofrainfallpatternsandeconomicstructuresinSydney,Tokyo,London,andNewYorkbetween2015and2019.Intermsofrainfall,asshowninthebarchart,Sydneyrecordedthehighestaverageannualrainfall,reaching1,200mmannually,significantlyhigherthanTokyo(800mm),London(600mm),andNewYork(500mm).Tokyoexperiencedmoderaterainfall,withslightvariationsoverthefive-yearperiod,whileLondonandNewYorkhadrelativelylowerandmoreconsistentprecipitationlevels.Notably,Sydney’srainfallwasconcentratedinthelatterhalfofeachyear,whereasTokyohadmoreevenlydistributedprecipitation.Thetablefurtherrevealstheeconomicprofilesofthesecitiesin2019.Sydney’seconomywasdominatedbytourism(45%),followedbyfinance(30%)andtechnology(25%).Tokyo’sprimaryindustrieswerefinance(40%),technology(35%),andtourism(25%),reflectingitsstatusasaglobalfinancialhub.LondonandNewYork,bothwithdiverseeconomies,reliedheavilyonfinance(35%and30%,respectively),followedbytourism(30%and25%)andtechnology(20%and15%).London’seconomywasslightlymorebalanced,withtechnologycontributingmorethaninNewYork.Insummary,Sydneystoodoutforitshighrainfallandtourism-driveneconomy,whileTokyocombinedfinancialandtechnologicalstrengths.LondonandNewYorkweresimilarintheirfinance-dominatedeconomiesbutdifferedintechnologyandtourismcontributions.Thedataunderscoresregionaldisparitiesinclimateandeconomicstructures.3.图表描述题（饼图+地图组合）题目：Thepiechartsillustratethepercentagedistributionofrenewableenergysources(solar,wind,hydro,andgeothermal)usedinfourcountries(Sweden,Denmark,India,andAustralia)in2020,whilethemaphighlightsthelocationsofmajorrenewableenergyfacilitiesineachcountry.PieCharts:ThefirstpiechartshowstheproportionofrenewableenergyinSweden(80%),Denmark(70%),India(30%),andAustralia(40%).Thesecondpiechartdetailsthespecificsources:solar(60%),wind(25%),hydro(10%),andgeothermal(5%)inSweden.Map:ThemapmarksrenewableenergyplantsinSweden(windfarmsinthenorth,solarpanelsinthesouth),Denmark(windturbinesalongthecoast),India(hydroelectricdamsintheHimalayas),andAustralia(solarfarmsintheoutback).要求：Summarizethedatainthepiechartsandmap.Highlightthegeographicalandtechnologicalpatternsofrenewableenergyuse.答案：ThepiechartsandmapprovideacomprehensiveoverviewofrenewableenergyadoptionandinfrastructureinSweden,Denmark,India,andAustraliain2020.Intermsofrenewableenergyusage,Swedenledwith80%adoption,primarilyfromsolar(60%),wind(25%),hydro(10%),andgeothermal(5%).Denmarkfollowedwith70%,dominatedbywind(50%)andsolar(20%),reflectingitsstrongoffshorewindcapacity.Indiareportedthelowestrateat30%,mainlyfromhydro(20%)andsolar(10%),withlimitedwindandgeothermaluse.Australia,at40%,reliedheavilyonsolar(30%)andwind(10%),withhydroandgeothermalplayingminorroles.Themapfurtherclarifiesthegeographicaldistributionofrenewablefacilities.InSweden,windfarmswereconcentratedinthenortherncoastalregions,whilesolarpanelswereinstalledinsouthernplains.Denmark’smapshowedextensivewindturbinesalongitscoastlines.India’shydroelectricplantswerestrategicallylocatedinHimalayanrivervalleys,whileAustralia’ssolarfarmsspannedaridregionsliketheOutback.Overall,SwedenandDenmarkdemonstratedadvancedrenewableenergyintegration,leveragingdiversesourcesandstrategiclocations.IndiaandAustralia,whileimproving,stillreliedontraditionalenergybutwereexpandingsolarcapacity.Thedatahighlightsthecorrelationbetweengeographicaladvantagesandrenewableenergypolicies.Task2(学术类/培训类)题型：议论文题量：3题每题分数：9分1.议论文（社会问题）题目：Somepeoplebelievethatgovernmentsshouldspendmoremoneyonimprovingroadsandhighwaysthanonpublictransportation.Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagree?要求：Discussbothviewsandgiveyourownopinion.答案：Theallocationofgovernmentfundsbetweenroadinfrastructureandpublictransportationisacontentiousissue,withproponentsofeachsideofferingcompellingarguments.Whileimprovedroadsenhancepersonalmobilityandeconomicefficiency,prioritizingpublictransportfosterssustainabilityandsocialequity.Ononehand,advocatesforroaddevelopmentarguethatwell-maintainedhighwaysareessentialforeconomicgrowthandconvenience.Businessesrelyonefficientroadnetworksforlogistics,reducingtransportationcostsandboostingtrade.Additionally,personalvehiclesprovideflexibilityandaccessibility,particularlyinruralareaswherepublictransportisscarce.Criticsofpublictransport,suchasbusesandtrains,claimtheyareovercrowded,slow,andlackcoverage,makingroadsamorepracticalchoiceformany.Ontheotherhand,investinginpublictransportationofferslong-termbenefits.Firstly,publictransitreducestrafficcongestionandpollution,asfewercarsmeanlowercarbonemissions.Secondly,affordableandaccessibletransportsystemsimprovequalityoflife,especiallyforlow-incomegroups,theelderly,andstudents.CountrieslikeJapanand荷兰havedemonstratedthatwell-developedmetrosystemsenhanceurbanproductivitywhileminimizingenvironmentalimpact.Inmyview,whileroadsarenecessary,governmentsshouldprioritizepublictransportation.Balancedinfrastructuredevelopmentensuresbotheconomicandenvironmentalsustainability.Forinstance,integratingsmarttrafficmanagementwithefficientpublictransitcanreducecongestionandenergywaste.Moreover,publictransportencouragescarpoolingandreducesrelianceonfossilfuels,aligningwithglobalclimategoals.Ultimately,aholisticapproachthatcombinesroadimprovementswithrobustpublictransportisideal.However,givenlimitedresources,investmentsshouldfavoreco-friendlyandinclusivesolutions.2.议论文（教育）题目：Somepeoplethinkthatuniversityeducationshouldbefreeforallstudents,whileothersbelievethatstudentsshouldpaytuitionfees.Discussbothviewsandstateyouropinion.要求：Giveyourreasonsandexamplestosupportyouranswer.答案：Thedebateoverfreeuniversityeducationversustuitionfeestouchesonequity,affordability,andresourceallocation.Whilemakingeducationaccessibletoallsoundsideal,itcomeswitheconomicandlogisticalchallenges.Proponentsoffreeeducationarguethatitreducesinequalitybyenablingtalentedstudentsfromlow-incomebackgroundstopursuehigherstudieswithoutfinancialburden.CountrieslikeNorwayandGermanyhaveimplementedtuition-freemodels,resultinginhigherenrollmentratesanddiversestudentpopulations.Freeeducationalsobenefitssocietybycreatingamoreskilledworkforce,drivinginnovation,andreducingsocialdisparities.Criticsoftuitionfees,however,arguethattheyfunduniversitiesadequately,ensuringqualityeducationthroughcompetitionandefficiency.Opponentsoffreeeducation,however,highlightpotentialdrawbacks.Firstly,governmentsmayfacebudgetconstraints,leadingtoreducedfundingforresearchorinfrastructure.Secondly,freeuniversitiesmightattractunmotivatedstudents,loweringacademicstandards.Additionally,tuitionfeesincentivizestudentstocompletedegreesefficiently,astheybearfinancialresponsibility.Inmyopinion,whilefreeeducationisdesirable,itshouldbeaccompaniedbytargetedfinancialaidtoensureaccessibility.Forinstance,need-basedscholarshipsorsubsidizedprogramscanhelpdisadvantagedstudentswithoutoverburdeninginstitutions.Universitiescouldalsoadoptcost-effectivemeasures,suchasonlinecoursesorcommunitypartnerships,tooptimizeresources.Ultimately,abalancedapproach—combiningaffordabilitywithaccountability—iscrucial.Governments,universities,andstudentsmustcollaboratetocreatesustainableeducationsystemsthatbenefitall.3.议论文（科技与环境）题目：Manypeoplebelievethattechnologicaladvancementsarethekeytosolvingenvironmentalproblems.Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagree?要求：Discussbothviewsandgiveyourownopinion.答案：Technologicalinnovationhasbeentransformativeinaddressingenvironmentalchallenges,butitisnotastandalonesolution.Whiletechnologyofferspromisingtools,itseffectivenessdependsonsustainablepracticesandpolicysupport.Ononehand,technologicaladvancementshaveenabledsignificantenvironmentalprogress.Forexample,renewableenergytechnologieslikesolarpanelsandwindturbineshavereducedrelianceonfossilfuels.Smartgridsoptimizeenergydistribution,minimizingwaste.Additionally,advancem