2026年托福英语写作专项练习题目及参考

2026年托福英语写作专项练习题目及参考Task1:IntegratedWriting(30分钟，综合写作)说明：本部分包含1题，计30分。考生需阅读一篇学术文章，听取一段相关讲座，然后根据讲座内容对文章观点进行总结、对比或反驳。题目1(1题，30分):阅读文章：ArecentstudypublishedintheJournalofEnvironmentalSciencearguesthaturbangreenspaces,suchasparksandcommunitygardens,shouldbeprioritizedincityplanningtoimprovepublichealth.Thearticlehighlightsthreekeybenefits:reducedstresslevels,increasedphysicalactivity,andenhancedmentalwell-being.Accordingtotheresearchers,greenspacesactasnatural"stressbuffers,"helpingresidentscopewithurbanpressures.Additionally,theseareasencouragewalkingandoutdoorexercise,whichcombatobesityandcardiovasculardiseases.Thestudyconcludesthatcitieswithhighergreenspacedensityreportlowerratesofmentalhealthissues,suchasanxietyanddepression.讲座内容：Auniversityprofessorchallengesthearticle'sconclusions.Theprofessornotesthatwhilegreenspacesdoprovidesomehealthbenefits,thestudyoversimplifiestheissue.First,theresearchreliesonself-reporteddata,whichmaybebiased.Second,theprofessorarguesthatsocioeconomicfactorsplayamoresignificantroleinpublichealthoutcomesthangreenspaceavailability.Forexample,low-incomeneighborhoodsoftenlackbothgreenspacesandaccesstohealthcare,makingitdifficulttoisolatetheimpactofgreenareasalone.Finally,theprofessorsuggeststhatthestudyfailstoconsideralternativesolutions,suchasimprovingpublictransportationtoreducetraffic-relatedstress.写作任务：Summarizethepointsmadeinthelecture,explaininghowtheycastdoubtonthepointsmadeinthereadingpassage.参考答案及解析：答案：Thelecturechallengesthereadingpassage'sclaimthaturbangreenspacesaretheprimarysolutionforimprovingpublichealth.Theprofessorarguesthatthestudy'sconclusionsareflawedforthreemainreasons.First,theprofessorquestionsthereliabilityoftheresearchbecauseitdependsonself-reporteddata,whichmaybesubjective.Forinstance,residentsmightoverstatetheirstresslevelsorphysicalactivitytoappearhealthierthantheyare.Thismethodologicalweaknessunderminesthestudy'svalidity.Second,theprofessoremphasizesthatsocioeconomicfactorsaremoreinfluentialthangreenspaceavailabilityindetermininghealthoutcomes.Inmanylow-incomeareas,peoplelackbothaccesstogreenspacesandadequatehealthcare,makingitimpossibletoattributebetterhealthsolelytogreenareas.Thestudyfailstoaccountfortheseconfoundingvariables.Finally,theprofessorcriticizesthestudyforignoringalternativesolutionstourbanhealthproblems.Shesuggeststhatimprovingpublictransportationcouldreducetraffic-relatedstress,whichisanothermajorcontributortopoormentalhealth.Byfocusingonlyongreenspaces,theresearchersoverlookmorepracticalandwidespreadinterventions.Insummary,thelectureeffectivelydebunksthereadingpassage'soversimplifiedviewbyhighlightingmethodologicalweaknesses,theimportanceofsocioeconomiccontext,andtheexistenceofalternativesolutions.解析：1.准确总结讲座观点：答案明确指出教授的三个反驳点——数据可靠性、社会经济因素影响、替代方案——与原文形成对比。2.逻辑清晰：使用"First,""Second,""Finally"等连接词，使论证层次分明。3.语言自然：避免生硬的AI式表达，采用简洁的学术英语，如"methodologicalweaknesses,""confoundingvariables."Task2:IndependentWriting(30分钟，独立写作)说明：本部分包含1题，计30分。考生需就某一话题提出个人观点，并支持论点。题目2(1题，30分):话题：Somepeoplebelievethatgovernmentsshouldspendmoremoneyonimprovingpublictransportation(e.g.,subways,buses)ratherthanonbuildingnewroads.Othersarguethatnewroadsarenecessarytoreducetrafficcongestion.Whichapproachdoyouprefer?Usespecificreasonsandexamplestosupportyouranswer.参考答案及解析：答案：Istronglypreferthatgovernmentsprioritizeinvestmentsinpublictransportationovernewroadconstruction.Whilenewroadsmayoffershort-termrelieffromtrafficcongestion,theyfailtoaddresstherootcausesofurbanmobilityissuesandoftenleadtounintendedconsequences.Incontrast,expandingpublictransitsystemspromotessustainability,equity,andlong-termeconomicgrowth.First,investinginpublictransportationismoreenvironmentallyfriendly.Unlikeroads,whichencouragecardependencyandcontributetoairpollution,trainsandbusescanmovelargenumbersofpeopleefficientlywhilereducingcarbonemissions.Forexample,citieslikeCopenhagenandAmsterdamhavesuccessfullyreducedtrafficjamsandpollutionbyinvestinginbike-sharingprogramsandhigh-frequencymetrosystems.Theseinitiativesnotonlyimproveairqualitybutalsoattractbusinessesandresidentswhovalueeco-friendlyliving.Second,publictransportationbenefitssocialequity.Inmanyurbanareas,low-incomefamiliesrelyonbusesandsubwaystocommutetoworkoraccesshealthcare.Newroads,however,primarilyserveprivatevehicles,exacerbatinginequalitybyisolatingthosewithoutcars.Forinstance,inNewYorkCity,thesubwaynetworkconnectsaffordablehousingwithjobcenters,whereassuburbansprawlhasmadeitharderforlow-incomeresidentstoreacheconomicopportunities.Finally,publictransitiseconomicallysustainableinthelongrun.Whileroadconstructionrequiresconstantmaintenanceandleadstohigherfuelcosts,well-designedtransitsystemscangeneraterevenuethroughticketsalesandreducedparkingfees.Tokyo’s地铁system,forexample,isself-sufficientandhasspurredcommercialdevelopmentalongitsroutes.Roads,bycontrast,oftenrequireadditionaltaxestofundrepairs,divertingresourcesfromotherpublicservices.Inconclusion,althoughnewroadsseemlikeaquickfixfortraffic,theycreatedependencyonfossilfuels,widensocialgaps,anddrainfinances.Publictransportationoffersamoreholisticsolutionbypromotingsustainability,equity,andeconomicefficiency.Governmentsshouldthereforefocusonexpandingtransitnetworkstobuildsmarter,morelivablecitiesforfuturegenerations.解析：1.明确立场：首段清晰表明观点，避免模糊表述。2.分点论证：使用"First,""Second,""Finally"结构，每个段落围绕一个核心论点展开。3.例证丰富：引用具体城市案例（如哥本哈根、纽约、东京），增强说服力。4.语言流畅：避免AI式套话，采用自然衔接（如"Forexample,""Incontrast"），符合学术写作风格。Task1:IntegratedWriting(30分钟，综合写作)说明：本部分包含1题，计30分。考生需阅读一篇学术文章，听取一段相关讲座，然后根据讲座内容对文章观点进行总结、对比或反驳。题目3(1题，30分):阅读文章：AreportbytheWorldHealthOrganizationsuggeststhatremoteworkpoliciescanimproveemployeeproductivityandreduceworkplacestress.Thearticlearguesthatvirtualcollaborationtools(e.g.,Zoom,Slack)havemadeitpossibleforteamstoworkeffectivelyfromhome.Additionally,thereporthighlightsbenefitssuchasreducedcommutingtime,lowerofficeoverheadcosts,andincreasedflexibilityforemployees.However,theauthorscautionthatremoteworkmayleadtoisolationanddecreasedteamcohesion.讲座内容：Abusinessconsultantchallengesthereport'soptimisticview.Theprofessornotesthatwhileremoteworkcanboostproductivityinsomecases,italsocreatesnewchallenges.First,thestudyoverlookstheimpactof"digitalfatigue"—employeeswhospendhoursonvideocallsexperienceburnoutandreducedcreativity.Second,theprofessorarguesthatremoteworkunderminescompanyculturebecausein-personinteractionsareessentialforbuildingtrust.Forexample,astudybyStanfordUniversityfoundthatremoteworkersreportedfeelinglessconnectedtotheirteamsthanoffice-basedemployees.Finally,theprofessorsuggeststhatthereportfailstoaddresstheissueofunequalaccesstoremoteworkopportunities,asemployeesinlow-payingjobsoftenlackthenecessaryequipmentorstableinternetconnections.写作任务：Summarizethepointsmadeinthelecture,explaininghowtheycastdoubtonthepointsmadeinthereadingpassage.参考答案及解析：答案：Thelecturechallengesthereadingpassage'sclaimthatremoteworkuniversallyimprovesproductivityandemployeewell-being.Theprofessorraisesthreekeyconcerns:digitalfatigue,culturalerosion,andunequalaccesstoremotework.First,theprofessorarguesthatthereportignoresthenegativeeffectsofprolongedscreentime.Thestudysuggeststhatremoteworkersaremoreproductivebecausetheyavoidofficedistractions,buttheprofessorpointsoutthat"digitalfatigue"canleadtoexhaustionandcreativitystagnation.Forinstance,employeeswhoattenddailyvideomeetingsmayexperiencementalfatigue,makingtheirworklessefficientinthelongrun.Second,theprofessorcriticizesthereportforunderestimatingtheimportanceofface-to-faceinteractionsinteamcohesion.Whilethestudymentionspotentialchallengeslikeisolation,theprofessorclaimsthatremoteworkfundamentallyweakenscompanyculture.Stanford’sresearchonremoteemployeessupportsthis,showingthatin-personcollaborationfosterstrustandinnovation,whichvirtualtoolscannotfullyreplicate.Finally,theprofessorhighlightsthereport’sfailuretoaddresssocioeconomicdisparitiesinremotework.Shenotesthatthestudyassumesallemployeeshaveequalaccesstotechnology,butthisisnottrueforlow-wageworkers.Withoutreliableinternetorhomeoffices,theseemployeesstruggletoperformremotely,makingthepolicyunfair.Insummary,thelectureeffectivelyquestionsthereadingpassage’soptimisticviewbypointingouttherisksofdigitalfatigue,culturaldecline,andunequalaccesstoremotework.解析：1.精准概括：答案明确指出教授的三个反驳点，与原文形成直接对比。2.引用研究：提及StanfordUniversity的研究，增强学术性。3.逻辑连贯：使用"First,""Second,""Finally"及过渡句（如"Forexample"），保持论证清晰。Task2:IndependentWriting(30分钟，独立写作)说明：本部分包含1题，计30分。考生需就某一话题提出个人观点，并支持论点。题目4(1题，30分):话题：Somepeoplebelievethatmuseumsshouldbefreetovisittoencouragepubliceducation,whileothersarguethatchargingadmissionisnecessarytofundpreservationandexhibitions.Whichviewdoyouagreewith?Usespecificreasonsandexamplestosupportyouranswer.参考答案及解析：答案：Istronglyagreethatmuseumsshouldchargeadmissionfees,asthisensuresfinancialsustainability,supportspreservationefforts,andalignswiththeprivateenterprisemodelofculturalinstitutions.Whilefreeaccessmayseemidealforpubliceducation,itignoresthepracticalchallengesofmaintaininghigh-qualityexhibitsandhistoricsites.First,chargingadmissionallowsmuseumstofundcriticalpreservationwork.InstitutionsliketheLouvreandtheBritishMuseumrelyonticketsalestorestoreagingartifactsandmaintaininfrastructure.Withoutrevenue,manyhistoricalsiteswoulddeteriorateduetobudgetcuts.Forexample,theNationalMuseumofRomehasincreasedticketpricestoallocatefundsforurgentrepairstoancientfrescoes.Second,feeshelpmuseumsmaintaincompetitivestandardsinexhibitions.High-qualitydisplaysrequireexpensivetechnology,speciallighting,andprofess