2026年法律英语与案例分析综合试题

2026年法律英语与案例分析综合试题一、单项选择题（共10题，每题2分，合计20分）（注：以下题目聚焦中国商事仲裁与跨境合同领域，结合《仲裁法》《民法典》及国际商事惯例。）1.InadisputeundertheNewYorkConvention,whichofthefollowingstatementsiscorrectregardingtherecognitionandenforcementofforeignarbitralawards?A.Thedomesticcourtmustreviewthefairnessoftheawardonthemerits.B.Thecourthasthediscretiontorefuseenforcementiftheawardviolatespublicpolicy.C.Thearbitralinstitutionmustfirstobtainjudicialapprovalbeforeenforcement.D.Theawardisautomaticallyenforceablewithoutanyjudicialreview.2.UndertheShanghaiInternationalArbitrationCourt(SIAC)Rules,whichofthefollowingbestdescribestheroleofthearbitraltribunalinresolvingproceduralconflictsbetweenparties?A.Thetribunalmustfollowthestrictletteroftherules,withnoroomforflexibility.B.Thetribunalmaydisregardtherulesifitdeemsthemunfairtoeitherparty.C.Thetribunalshallconsultthepartiestodeterminethemostappropriateprocedure.D.Thetribunal’sdecisiononprocedureisnon-reviewablebythecourt.3.AcontractforthesaleofgoodsisgovernedbyCISG.Ifonepartybreachesthecontract,theotherpartymayclaimdamages.WhichofthefollowingremediesisNOTavailableunderCISG?A.Specificperformance.B.Liquidateddamages.C.Restitutioninkind.D.Nominaldamages.4.InaChina-UKBITdispute,iftheUKimposesaquantitativerestrictiononimportsofChinesegoods,whichofthefollowingremediesisavailabletoChinaunderthetreaty?A.Monetarycompensationonly.B.AclaimforMFNtreatment.C.Anobligationtoopenbordersunconditionally.D.Arighttoterminatethetreatyimmediately.5.Apartyinvokesthe"uncleanhands"defenseinanarbitrationundertheICCRules.Whichofthefollowingistrueregardingthisdefense?A.Itisautomaticallyfataltothearbitralaward.B.Itmustberaisedattheearliestopportunity.C.Itcanonlyberaisedaftertheawardisrendered.D.Itisbarredbytheprincipleofcomity.6.UndertheUNCITRALModelLawonInternationalCommercialArbitration,whichofthefollowingisagroundforsettingasideanarbitralaward?A.Thetribunalfailedtoexplainitsdecision.B.Thepartiesagreedtoadifferentdisputeresolutionmechanism.C.Theawardcontainsaconflictofinterestamongarbitrators.D.Theclaimwasnotsubstantiatedbyevidence.7.AChinesecompanysignsacontractwithaSwissfirminZurich,governedbySwisslaw.Iflitigationarises,whichofthefollowingisthemostappropriatejurisdictionforthecase?A.China,asthedefendant’shomecountry.B.Switzerland,asthecontract’splaceofperformance.C.TheICCInternationalCourtofArbitration,basedinParis.D.TheWorldCourtofInternationalJustice,asaneutralvenue.8.InaUNCITRALarbitration,ifthetribunaldeterminesthataclauseisvoid,whatisthemandatorycourseofaction?A.Thetribunalshallproceedwiththeremainingissues.B.Thetribunalmustterminatethearbitration.C.Thetribunalshallreformtheclausetomakeitvalid.D.Thepartiesmustnegotiateanewcontract.9.AChina-CanadaBITdisputeinvolvesaclaimbyCanadathatChina’sexpropriationmeasureswerenotjustandequitable.WhichofthefollowingisakeyrequirementforprovingexpropriationunderBITs?A.Themeasuremustbediscriminatory.B.Themeasuremustbearbitrary.C.Themeasuremustcausefinanciallosstotheinvestor.D.Themeasuremustviolatedomesticlaw.10.UndertheLCIARules,ifapartyfailstoattendahearing,whichofthefollowingisthetribunal’smandatoryaction?A.Thehearingshallbepostponedautomatically.B.Thetribunalmayproceedintheabsenceoftheparty.C.Theparty’sclaimsmustbedismissedoutright.D.Thetribunalmustobtaintheparty’sconsenttoproceed.二、多项选择题（共5题，每题3分，合计15分）（注：题目涉及国际投资仲裁、跨境诉讼程序及证据规则。）1.WhichofthefollowingarevalidgroundsforchallenginganarbitralawardundertheNewYorkConvention?A.Theawardviolatesthepublicpolicyoftheenforicingjurisdiction.B.Thetribunallackedjurisdictiontohearthecase.C.Theawardcontainsamanifesterroronthemerits.D.Thepartiesdidnotgivepropernoticeofthearbitration.2.UndertheICCRules,whichofthefollowingaredutiesowedbythepartiestothearbitraltribunal?A.Toprovideallrelevantdocuments.B.Todiscloseconflictsofinterest.C.Toparticipateinhearingsunlessexcused.D.Topaythearbitrators’feespromptly.3.InaCISGcase,whichofthefollowingarerecognizedtypesofdamages?A.Liquidateddamages.B.Nominaldamages.C.Punitivedamages.D.Restitution.4.AChina-GermanyBITdisputeinvolvesaclaimbyGermanythatChina’sregulatorychangescausedinvestmentlosses.WhichofthefollowingarecriticalelementsforGermanytoproveregulatoryindirecteffects?A.Thechangeswereunexpected.B.Thechangeswerenotnecessarytoachievelegitimatepolicygoals.C.Thechangeswereappliedinadiscriminatorymanner.D.Thechangesdirectlyexpropriatedtheinvestment.5.UndertheUNCITRALModelLaw,whichofthefollowingarepowersgrantedtothearbitraltribunal?A.Tograntinterimmeasures.B.Todeterminetheapplicablelaw.C.Toimposecostsonthelosingparty.D.Toconductsiteinspections.三、案例分析题（共3题，第1题8分，第2题9分，第3题7分，合计24分）（注：案例涉及跨境合同纠纷、投资仲裁及仲裁规则适用。）Case1(8points):Facts:AU.S.company("Seller")andaChinesecompany("Buyer")enteredintoalong-termsupplycontractforrareearthminerals,governedbyCISG.ThecontractstipulatedthatdisputeswouldberesolvedthroughICCarbitrationinParis.In2024,theBuyerfailedtomakefullpayment,claimingthattheSellerhadbreachedthecontractbydeliveringgoodswithdefectivequality.TheSellerfiledanICCclaim,seekingdamagesandspecificperformance.Questions:1.WhatarethemandatoryproceduralstepstheICCarbitraltribunalmustfollowundertheICCRules?2.CantheBuyerraisethe"uncleanhands"defense?Whyorwhynot?Case2(9points):Facts:ACanadianminingcompany("Investor")investedinacoppermineinYunnan,China,underaCanada-ChinaBIT.In2025,Chinaimplementedanewenvironmentalregulation,requiringtheminetoinstallcostlypollutioncontrolequipment.TheInvestorclaimedthattheregulationconstitutedexpropriationwithoutjustcompensation,andfiledaclaimundertheBIT.TheChinesegovernmentarguedthattheregulationwasnecessarytoprotecttheenvironmentandwasappliednon-discriminatorily.Questions:1.WhatarethekeyelementstheInvestormustprovetoestablishexpropriationundertheBIT?2.CanChinainvokethe"comity"defensetoresisttheInvestor’sclaim?Explain.Case3(7points):Facts:AJapanesecompany("Plaintiff")andaGermancompany("Defendant")enteredintoajointventureagreementinShanghai,governedbyGermanlaw.TheagreementincludedanarbitrationclauseundertheUNCITRALModelLaw.In2024,thePlaintifffiledanarbitralclaiminShanghaiInternationalArbitrationCourt(SIAC),seekingcompensationfortheDefendant’sbreachofcontract.TheDefendantchallengedthearbitrator’simpartiality,claimingthatonearbitratorhadpreviouslyrepresentedtheDefendantinanothercase.Questions:1.Whatarethegroundsforchallenginganarbitrator’simpartialityundertheUNCitRALModelLaw?2.IftheSIACtribunalfindsthearbitratorbiased,whatisthemandatoryoutcome?答案与解析一、单项选择题答案与解析1.B-解析:UndertheNewYorkConvention,courtshavethediscretiontorefuseenforcementiftheawardviolatespublicpolicy(Art.10(3)).Otheroptionsareincorrect:(A)Reviewonmeritsisnotrequired;(C)Judicialapprovalisnotneededbeforeenforcement;(D)Awardsarenotautomaticallyenforceable.2.C-解析:TheSIACRulesallowthetribunaltoadaptprocedurestothecase’sneeds,providedthepartiesagreeorthetribunalfollowsdueprocess(Rule1.4,SIACRules).Option(A)istoorigid;(B)ignorespartyautonomy;(D)isincorrectascourtsmayreviewproceduralerrors.3.D-解析:CISGprohibitsnominaldamages(Art.74(2)),asdamagesmustbesubstantialandforeseeable.OtherremediesareavailableunderCISG.4.B-解析:UnderBITs,aquantitativerestrictiononimportstriggersaclaimforMFNtreatmentornationaltreatment(dependingonthetreaty’sprovisions).Monetarycompensationisnotautomatic;(C)and(D)areincorrect.5.B-解析:The"uncleanhands"defensemustberaisedbeforethearbitralawardisrendered(ICCRules,Art.13(5)).Itisnotautomaticorbarredbycomity.6.C-解析:UndertheUNCITRALModelLaw,groundsforsettingasideincludefraud,lackofjurisdiction,orarbitratorbias(Art.34(2)(a)(c)).Otheroptionsarenotgroundsforsettingaside.7.B-解析:UnderSwissprivateinternationallaw,contractsgovernedbyforeignlawaretypicallyadjudicatedinthecontract’splaceofperformance(Art.187CivilCode).Otheroptionsareincorrect.8.A-解析:Ifaclauseisvoid,thetribunalshallproceedwiththeremainingissueswithoutreformingtheclause(UNCITRALModelLaw,Art.16(3)).9.C-解析:ToproveexpropriationunderBITs,theinvestormustshowfinanciallossduetothemeasure,evenifitwasjustified(ITAReportonChina-CanadaBIT).Discriminationorarbitrarinessarenotsufficient.10.B-解析:UndertheLCIARules,aparty’sabsencedoesnotautomaticallypostponethehearing;thetribunalmayproceedifitdeemsitappropriate(Rule24.1).二、多项选择题答案与解析1.A,B,D-解析:GroundsforrefusingenforcementundertheNewYorkConventionincludepublicpolicyviolations,lackofjurisdiction,andnoticeissues(Art.10(3)).Manifesterroronthemeritsisnotaground.2.A,B,C-解析:Partiesmustprovidedocuments,discloseconflicts,andparticipateinhearings(ICCRules,Art.13,23).Feepaymentisnotadutyoftheparties.3.A,B,D-解析:CISGrecognizesliquidateddamages,nominaldamages(rare),andrestitution.Punitivedamagesarenotavailable.4.A,B,C-解析:Toproveindirecteffectsofregulation,theinvestormustshowthemeasurewasunexpected,unnecessary,ordiscriminatory.Directexpropriationisaseparateclaim.5.A,B,D-解析:UNCITRALModelLawgrantsinterimmeasures(Art.17),determinationoflaw(Art.31),andsiteinspections(Art.33).Imposingcostsisnotapowerofthetribunal.三、案例分析题答案与解析Case1(8points)1.MandatoryproceduralstepsunderICCRules:-Thetribunalmustfollowtherulesofprocedure,butmayadaptthem(ICCRules,Art.1.4).-Thetribunalmustfixatimetab