SCI论文的书写与投稿

1、Introduction,A naturalists life would be happy one if he had only to observe and never to write (Charles Darwin) In science, no matter how spectacular the results are, the work is not completed until the results are published One of the best ways scientific researchers provide their expertise and to

2、 be recognized professionally is to publish as many good papers as possible in a number of very prestigious professional journals,Introduction,Journals decide which manuscripts to publish largely on the opinions of other scientists who judge the quality of submitted papers- A process called peer rev

3、iew Attracting the reviewers attention and support is vital! The purpose of this presentation is to help candidates to prepare the manuscript and to show all steps from the rough manuscript to published paper,Contents,kinds of scientific written communication scientific writing in general IMRAD form

4、at paper organization paper writing paper submission the editing process proof-reading and pointers to reading,Scientific written communication,Reports Theses or dissertations Journal articles Slide presentations Posters Books and book chapters Technical manuals/users guides Research or grant propos

5、als,Why Publish?,contributes knowledge ensures scientific rigor allows feedback (improves work) Promotes career document productivity document impact on field/reputation Advertises your lab for future trainees improves chances of funding,Information on writing scientific paper,Scientific writing is

6、primarily an exercise in organization Scientific writing is highly stylized with distinctive and clearly evident component parts Each scientific paper should have proper order in contents,Information on writing scientific paper,If your research work is important, then it should be communicated effec

7、tively, clearly in words of certain meaning The best English in scientific writing is that which gives the sense in the fewest short words Enjoy the sheer of beauty of simple declarative sentence using clear and short word The ultimate goal of scientific research is publication,Information on writin

8、g scientific paper,Scientists with PhD can make journal editors quite happy with plain, unassuming, simple, and freshman level composition A scientific paper is not literature If the ingredients are properly organized, the paper will almost write itself,Information on writing scientific paper,The ve

9、ry first decision you need to make is to which journal you intend to submit. This in itself is often a difficult task Many factors are involved in the decision (e.g. impact of the journal vs probability of acceptance; publication lag; desired audience, etc) Once you decide, read the journals “Instru

10、ctions for authors”, usually found inside the front or back cover. Ensure that you follow all of these to the letter,Information on writing scientific paper,Also, journals differ in style - some use “Introduction” as a heading for that section, others dont. Peruse some published papers to acquaint y

11、ourself with the journals style. This is much easier than reading the formatting instructions,Mission of Scientific Journals,Publication of important, quality and current scientific information,Criteria for Acceptance,Clarity of objectiveness Originality Appropriate experimental design and methods A

12、ppropriate statistical analysis,Criteria for Acceptance,Depth of the investigation Substance of the results Scientific interpretation and thorough discussion of results The importance of topic to the journal,Rejection - Why?,Wrong Journal The subject matter is of insufficient interest to the readers

13、hip to a specific journal Offering too long Faults in presentation Retrospective study Statistics The results are trivial The scientific quality is substandard Groups in trial not comparable,The object of a Scientific Paper,Enable the reader to: Assess the observations you made Repeat the experiment

14、 if they wish Determine whether the conclusions drawn are justified,IMRAD format,Other types of journal papers,State-of-the-art Review Bibliography Technical notes Letter to the editor,Paper organization,Title The title is the only part of your paper most people will read - make it clear, concise (s

15、elf-contained) and informative Actual findings should be described with claims that can be supported It should be catchy / memorable The title is a label, not a sentence,The list of Authors,Student first, supervisor second An author of a paper should be defined as one who takes intellectual responsi

16、bility for the research results being reported Give credit where it is due. It does not cost anything, and it creates friends. Science is more of a social activity than you might think Authors affiliations and corresponding author,Paper organization,Abstract The abstract is vitally important - witho

17、ut doubt the most important 200-300 words in the paper Never forget that the abstract is often the only thing readers will read from your paper. Pay attention to it! Make it very concise, clear-cut, easy to read. Avoid technical terms or complicated reasoning First 1-2 sentences: introduction to the

18、 concept Next 1-2 sentences: the system and the specific question,Abstract,No methods, unless unavoidable or new Next x sentences, a brief summary of the results Final 1-2 sentences: conclusion You can end with a sentence that hints at the major topic of the discussion Typed as a single paragraph No

19、 abbreivations /or citations As a summary of work done, it is written in past tense,Paper organization,Introduction No more than 2 pages A bad beginning makes a bad ending call attention to the specific subject, define the problem provide background and present the results of other studies (literatu

20、re review) Should not be (too) technical list the structure of your research project and what you plan to present in your paper,Materials and Methods,Sufficient detail so that work can be repeated Describe new methods in detail- the degree of replication and sensitivity Cite the accepted method brie

21、fly using reference If a published method is modified, such modifications must be described in detail,Materials and Methods,Statistical analysis of data if appropriate. Use subheadings as needed for clarity ask a colleague if he/she can follow the methodology Since your procedures have been complete

22、d, report them using past tense.,Paper organization,Results Display of data with logical development showing how your findings satisfy your objectives The results should be short and sweet, with no excess verbiage Present and discuss results concisely using figures and tables as needed Findings desc

23、ribed in past tense,Results,Generally does NOT include explanations or discussion of the results Table and figure legends should be accompanied with sufficient information for main point. Table and figure should be able to stand alone All tables and figures must be numbered in the order in which the

24、y are mentioned in the text Numerical data with the correct number of significant digits,Paper organization,Discussion the hardest section to write, you discuss, you do not recapitulate the Results show the relationship among observed facts Clearly indicate what new information is provided by the pr

25、esent study- - originality end with a short summary/conclusion,Discussion Advice,Move from your specific findings to the literature, theory and practice Make sure not to ignore the major issue (did it resolve problem, answer question, support hypothesis? Dont overgeneralize or make unsupported concl

26、usions Dont ignore deviations in your data Avoid speculation that cannot be tested in near future,Conclusions,Conclusions should not be a summary of the work done or a virtual duplication of the abstract Conclusions should be justified by the data presented Emphasis should be on major conclusions an

27、d implication Conclusion is optional in many scientific journals,“Thank you” Acknowledgments,Technical assistance Advice on research or manuscript Gifts of materials Assistance in preparing manuscript Financial assistance,Searching scientific literature,Explore ideas to your subject gaps in research

28、 on a subject of interest existence of any duplication to your work Conduct a specific search manually in the library on-line searching Keep up-to-date with the specific subject,Literature review,Developing an outline chronological arrangement comparison and contrast in contraversional theories Crea

29、ting a skeleton select a few documents and write about each discern the main points of their contents,High Quality of Review,Free from bias Constructive In-depth and thorough review The emphasis on the points of major importance,Points of considerations,Before submitting a paper, therefore, be sure

30、that you have something important and publishable to say. To know this, you should discuss your results with others working in the field, both in your own institution and elsewhere. The best way to do this is to present your results at scientific meetings if you can get to them.,A rough draft is rea

31、dy but .,Will you have co-authors? Which journal to submit your manuscript? How soon will it be published? How to deal with editors?,Professional publishers Elsevier Springer Verlag J Wiley & Sons Kluwer Academic Publishing MCB University Press IOP Publishing Academic Press,Journals - Publishers,Whe

32、re to submit the manuscript,The prestige factor The circulation factor The frequency factor The audience factor,Paper writing,Write a rough abstract first or start text in the middle A rough draft is ready Select the journal and read Instructions to Authors (manuscript requirements: style in heading

33、s, the system for citations, figures and tables, etc.) Write the final manuscript,The final draft,Front Matter Title (fewest possible words that describe the contents) Authors (co-authors) name and address Abstract (miniversion of the paper, no citations) Keywords Article Body Introduction Theoretic

34、al and experimental sections Results Discussion/Conclusion End Matter Acknowledgment (technical help and financial assistance) References (at 52 journals were found 33 different styles for listing) Appendixes,Citations and references,For a better credibility you have to review the literature and sho

35、w that your contribution extends from a solid foundation of research Quality and quantity of the sources you have consulted will enhance your work You have make it possible for readers to retrace your steps Your references can be as valuable as your research methods and findings At least three citat

36、ion styles (in-text citations) and 100 reference styles are commonly used,Citations: Alphabet-number system,Examples in the text In 1986 Schmitt (10) developed a . With optimum design sensitivity (10) .,References 9. Schittkowski, K. 1999. Nonlinear Programming Software. 10. Schmitt, L. A. 1986. Sym

37、posium summary and concluding remarks. .,Note: list of references in author alphabetical order,Citations: Name-year (Harward) system,Examples in the text: Schmitt (1986) developed a With optimum design sensitivity (Schmitt, 1986) .,References Schittkowski, K. Nonlinear Programming Software, 1999. Sc

38、hmitt, L. A. Symposium and concluding remarks,1986.,Note: list of references in author alphabetical order,Citations: Order of citation (Vancouver) system,Examples in the text In 1986, Schmitt (1) developed a . With optimum design sensitivity (1) .,References 1. Schmitt, L. A. (1986). Symposium summa

39、ry and concluding remarks,Note: list of references not in author alphabetical order,Ethics of scientific writing,Avoid the dual publication Dont use the work of others without appropriate attribution List only those co-authors who contributed substantially to the work,Final submission,In-house revie

40、ws are required? Submit the paper to the journals editor (only to one journal) Hard-copy of manuscript (usually three or more copies) Disk of the same version Text: Word, Word Perfect, TeX/LaTeX, etc. Figures: tif, gif, postscript, etc.,Editing process,Editor log a manuscript and send an acknowledgement that the paper has been received Editor sends the manuscript to reviewers On the basis of the reviews and the editors opinion, your paper