2026年GRE阅读理解题型解析与预测题目

2026年GRE阅读理解题型解析与预测题目1.主旨题（1题，3分）题目：Thepassagebelowdiscussestheimpactofurbangreenspacesonmentalhealth.Whichofthefollowingbestsummarizesthemainargument?（以下段落探讨了城市绿地对心理健康的影响。以下哪项最准确地概括了文章的主要论点？）文本：Urbangreenspaces,suchasparksandcommunitygardens,havebeenincreasinglyrecognizedfortheirroleinimprovingmentalhealth.A2023studybytheUniversityofTokyofoundthatindividualslivingwithin500metersofagreenspacereportedlowerlevelsofstressandanxietycomparedtothoseinurbanareaswithoutsuchspaces.Thestudyfurthernotedthatregularexposuretogreenenvironmentscouldenhancecognitivefunctions,particularlyinchildren.However,criticsarguethatthebenefitsareunevenlydistributed,withwealthierneighborhoodsoftenhavingmoreaccesstohigh-qualitygreenspaces.Policymakersarenowadvocatingforequitabledistributionofurbangreenerytoaddressthesedisparities.答案与解析：答案：D."Thepassageemphasizesthaturbangreenspacesimprovementalhealth,buttheirbenefitsareunevenlydistributedandrequireequitablepolicies."解析：Thepassagehighlightstwokeypoints:(1)Greenspacespositivelyimpactmentalhealth(supportedbystudies),and(2)accesstothesespacesisunequal,necessitatingpolicyinterventions.OptionDcapturesbothaspects.Otheroptionsareincompleteormisrepresenttheargument.2.推理题（2题，各2分）题目1：Accordingtothepassage,whatcanbeinferredaboutthefutureofurbanplanningifcurrentdisparitiesingreenspacedistributionpersist?（根据文章，如果城市绿地分配不均的问题持续存在，未来城市规划可能如何发展？）答案与解析：答案：B."Mentalhealthdisparitiesbetweenwealthierandpoorerneighborhoodsmayworsen."解析：Thepassagementionsthatwealthierareashavebetteraccesstogreenspaces,whilepoorerareaslackthem.Ifthistrendcontinues,thementalhealthgapbetweenthesegroupscouldexpand.Theinferenceislogicalbutnotexplicitlystatedinthetext.题目2：IfthestudybytheUniversityofTokyoweretoshownegativeeffectsofgreenspacesonmentalhealth,howmightthepassage'stonechange?（如果东京大学的这项研究表明绿地对心理健康有负面影响，文章的基调可能会如何变化？）答案与解析：答案：C."Thepassagewouldquestionthevalueofurbangreenspacesandcallforalternativementalhealthsolutions."解析：Thecurrentpassagesupportsgreenspacespositively.Anegativestudywouldshiftthefocustoskepticismandalternatives,asthebenefitswouldnolongerjustifytheirpromotion.3.细节题（3题，各1分）题目1：Whatspecificdistancewasmentionedinthestudyregardingtheproximityofgreenspacestoresidentialareas?（研究中提到了什么具体距离，关于绿地与居民区的距离？）答案与解析：答案：500meters解析：Thetextexplicitlystates"individualslivingwithin500metersofagreenspace."Nootherdistanceismentioned.题目2：Whichgroupwasfoundtobenefitmostfromgreenspacesinthestudy?（研究中哪个群体从绿地中受益最大？）答案与解析：答案：Children解析：Thepassagenotes,"regularexposuretogreenenvironmentscouldenhancecognitivefunctions,particularlyinchildren."Noothergroupishighlighted.题目3：Whatistheprimarycriticismofurbangreenspacesraisedinthepassage?（文章中提出的对城市绿地的首要批评是什么？）答案与解析：答案：Unevendistribution解析：Thepassagestates,"criticsarguethatthebenefitsareunevenlydistributed,withwealthierneighborhoodsoftenhavingmoreaccess."Thisisthecentralcriticism.4.逻辑结构题（1题，3分）题目：Howdoesthepassageorganizeitsargumentabouturbangreenspaces?（文章如何组织其关于城市绿地的论证？）答案与解析：答案：A."Thepassagefirstpresentsevidenceofgreenspaces'benefits,thenintroducesacritique,andfinallyproposesapolicysolution."解析：Thestructurefollows:(1)Benefits(studyevidence),(2)Critique(unevendistribution),(3)Solution(equitablepolicies).Thisisaclassicproblem-solutionformat.5.态度题（1题，2分）题目：Whatistheauthor'sattitudetowardurbangreenspaces?（作者对城市绿地的态度是什么？）答案与解析：答案：C.Supportivebutcautious解析：Theauthoracknowledgesbenefitsbuthighlightsdisparities,suggestingabalancedperspectiveratherthanoutrightendorsement.6.作者观点题（1题，2分）题目：Iftheauthorweretoexpandthepassage,whichadditionalpointmighttheyinclude?（如果作者要扩展文章，他们可能会加入哪个额外观点？）答案与解析：答案：Economicbenefitsofgreenspaces(e.g.,increasedpropertyvalues).解析：Thepassagefocusesonmentalhealth,buttheauthormightalsodiscusseconomicimpacts,asthisisacommonextensioninurbanplanningdiscussions.7.例证题（1题，2分）题目：Thepassagementions"communitygardens"asanexampleofurbangreenspaces.Whatdoesthisexamplesuggest?（文章提到“社区花园”作为城市绿地的例子。这个例子暗示了什么？）答案与解析：答案：Accessibilityandcommunityengagement解析：Communitygardensareoftenmorelocallyaccessiblethanlargeparks,suggestinginclusivity.Theexampleimpliesthatgreenspacescanfostercommunityinteraction.8.补充信息题（1题，3分）题目：Ifthepassageweretoincludeacounterargument,whatmightitbe?（如果文章中加入反驳观点，可能会是什么？）答案与解析：答案：Highmaintenancecostsofgreenspacescouldoutweightheirbenefits.解析：Whilethepassagefocusesonbenefits,acounterargumentmightquestionfeasibility(e.g.,fundingchallenges),whichisacommoncritiqueinurbanplanningdebates.9.比较题（1题，2分）题目：Howdoesthepassagecomparetheeffectsofgreenspacesonmentalhealthversuscognitivefunctions?（文章如何比较绿地对心理健康和认知功能的影响？）答案与解析：答案：Thepassagelinksgreenspacestomentalhealthmorebroadlybutspecifiescognitivebenefitsforchildren.解析：Mentalhealthisdiscussedasageneralimprovement,whilecognitivefunctionsarementionedasamoretargetedbenefitforchildren,showinganuanceddistinction.10.综合推理题（1题，3分）题目：Ifpolicymakersprioritizeequitablegreenspacedistribution,whatadditionalfactorsmighttheyneedtoconsiderbeyondwealth?（如果政策制定者优先考虑公平的绿地分配，除了财富外，他们还需要考虑哪些额外因素？）答案与解析：答案：D.Populationdensityandlandavailability解析：Beyondwealth,factorslikepopulationdensity(overcrowding)andlandscarcity(urbanspacelimitations)arecriticalingreenspaceplanning.Thepassagedoesnot