IMF-高负债是否制约货币政策?来自通胀预期的证据(英)_第1页
IMF-高负债是否制约货币政策?来自通胀预期的证据(英)_第2页
IMF-高负债是否制约货币政策?来自通胀预期的证据(英)_第3页
IMF-高负债是否制约货币政策?来自通胀预期的证据(英)_第4页
IMF-高负债是否制约货币政策?来自通胀预期的证据(英)_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩59页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

IsHighDebtConstrainingMonetaryPolicy?EvidencefromInflationExpectations

WP/23/143

IMFWorkingPapersdescriberesearchin

progressbytheauthor(s)andarepublishedto

elicitcommentsandtoencouragedebate.

TheviewsexpressedinIMFWorkingPapersare

thoseoftheauthor(s)anddonotnecessarily

representtheviewsoftheIMF,itsExecutiveBoard,

orIMFmanagement.

2023

JUN

©2023InternationalMonetaryFund

WP/23/143

IMFWorkingPaper

MonetaryandCapitalMarketsandWesternHemisphereDepartments

IsHighDebtConstrainingMonetaryPolicy?EvidencefromInflationExpectations

PreparedbyLuisBrandao-Marques,MarcoCasiraghi,GastonGelos,OlamideHarrison,andGunes

Kamber*

AuthorizedfordistributionbyDavidHofman

June2023

IMFWorkingPapersdescriberesearchinprogressbytheauthor(s)andarepublishedtoelicitcommentsandtoencouragedebate.TheviewsexpressedinIMFWorkingPapersarethoseoftheauthor(s)anddonotnecessarilyrepresenttheviewsoftheIMF,itsExecutiveBoard,orIMFmanagement.

ABSTRACT:Thispaperexamineswhetherhighgovernmentdebtlevelsposeachallengetocontaininginflation.Itdoessobyassessingtheimpactofgovernmentdebtsurprisesoninflationexpectationsinadvanced-andemergingmarketeconomies.Itfindsthatdebtsurprisesraiselong-terminflationexpectationsinemergingmarketeconomiesinapersistentway,butnotinadvancedeconomies.Theeffectsarestrongerwheninitialdebtlevelsarealreadyhigh,wheninflationlevelsareinitiallyhigh,andwhendebtdollarizationissignificant.Bycontrast,debtsurpriseshaveonlymodesteffectsineconomieswithinflationtargetingregimes.Increaseddebtlevelsmaycomplicatethefightagainstinflationinemergingmarketeconomieswithhighanddollarizeddebtlevels,andweakermonetarypolicyframeworks.

RECOMMENDEDCITATION:

JELClassificationNumbers:

E31,E41,E52,E62

Keywords:

Inflationexpectations;monetarypolicy;fiscaldominance;debt

Author’sE-MailAddress:

lmarques@,mcasiraghi@,ggelos@,oharrison@;gkamber@

IMFWORKINGPAPERS

DebtSurprisesandInflationExpectations

INTERNATIONALMONETARYFUND3

WORKINGPAPERS

IsHighDebtConstrainingMonetaryPolicy?EvidencefromInflationExpectations

PreparedbyLuisBrandao-Marques,MarcoCasiraghi,GastonGelos,OlamideHarrison,andGunesKamber1

1TheauthorswouldliketothankGustavoAdler,BergljotBarkbu,DavidHofman,andErlendNierfortheircomments.ZoeStraussprovidedexcellentresearchassistance.

IMFWORKINGPAPERS

DebtSurprisesandInflationExpectations

INTERNATIONALMONETARYFUND4

Contents

INTRODUCTION 5

THEORETICALMECHANISMS 6

DATAANDEMPIRICALMETHODS 7

EconometricApproach 7

Data 10

RESULTS 12

MainResults–EmergingMarket-vs.AdvancedEconomies 12

StateDependence 15

GovernmentDebtLevel 15

InflationLevel 17

DebtDollarization 19

Inflation-Targeting 20

ROBUSTNESS 22

CONCLUSION 24

REFERENCES 25

FIGURES

1.DataAvailability_______________________________________________________________11

2.Debt-to-GDPSurprisesonImpact_________________________________________________11

3.DebtSurprisesAcrossWEOVintages______________________________________________12

4.Responseof5-YearInflationExpectationstoGovernmentDebtShocks,Baseline___________14

5.Responseof5-YearInflationExpectationstoGovernmentDebtShocks,byInitialDebt_______16

6.Responseof5-YearInflationExpectationstoGovernmentDebtShocks,byInitialInflationLevelClassification_________________________________________________________________18

7.Responseof5-YearInflationExpectationstoGovernmentDebtShocks,EmergingMarkets—InitialFXShareofGovernmentDebt_______________________________________________________20

8.ResponseofInflationExpectationstoGovernmentDebtShocks,byInflationTargetingRegimeClassification_________________________________________________________________21

9.ResponseofInflationExpectationstoGovernmentDebtSurprises,EmergingMarkets—ConditionalontheFiscalStance______________________________________________________________22

10.ResponseofInflationExpectationstoGovernmentDebtSurprises,Emerging______________23

TABLES

1.SummaryStatistics____________________________________________________________10

2.Responseof5-YearInflationExpectations,Baseline(FullSample)_______________________14

3.Responseof5-YearInflationExpectations,Baseline(EmergingMarkets)__________________14

4.Responseof5-YearInflationExpectations,Baseline(AdvancedEconomies)_______________15

5.Responseof5-YearInflationExpectations,byInitialDebtLevelClassification______________16

7.Responseof5-YearInflationExpectations,byInitialInflationLevel_______________________18

8.Responseof5-YearInflationExpectations,byInitialFXDebtShareClassification___________20

9.RegressionResults,byICRGFinancialRiskRating,EmergingMarkets___________________24

ANNEXES

ANNEXI__________________________________________________________________________________________

29

ANNEXII_________________________________________________________________________________________30

INTERNATIONALMONETARYFUND5

Introduction

TheCOVID-19crisispropelledsovereigndebtlevelsaroundtheworldtonewheights.Between2019and2022,inadvancedeconomies,debtlevelsrosefrom103.9to112.5percentofGDP,andinemergingmarketeconomies,theygrewfrom55.1to64.6percentofGDP.Sovereigndebtlevelsareexpectedtoremainhighincomingyears(IMF,2022),anddemandsonfiscalpolicyremainsubstantial.Atthesametime,higherlevelsofinterestratescouldincreasedebtservicesconsiderablyinthecomingyears.

Couldtheriseingovernmentdebtlevelsposeaproblemformonetarypolicy?Thisquestionisofparticularrelevanceascentralbanksarestrugglingwiththemajorchallengeposedbyinflationarypressures.Inprinciple,variousmechanismsbywhichhighsovereigndebtlevelscancomplicatemonetarypolicymakingareconceivable.Centralbanksmaybe(seenas)hesitanttoraiseinterestratesasmuchasneededtoachievetheirinflationobjective,outofconcernfordebtsustainability.Theymayalsobeconcernedabouttheimpactofrisingratesontheirownnetincomeiftheyremunerateexcessreserves,andontheirbalancesheetsastheyproceedtoactivelyshrinkthem.Inanextremeformoffiscaldominance,peoplemaybelievethatthecentralbankcouldtrytoinflateawaypartofthedebtorresorttooutrightmonetizationoffuturedeficits,whichinturnwouldleadinflationexpectationstoshootup.Thefiscaltheoryofthepricelevelhasreformulatedthesenotions,arguingthatpricelevelsadjustsothattherealvalueofgovernmentdebtequalsthepresentvalueoftaxeslessspending(Cochrane2023).

Suchconcernsare,inprinciple,relevantforbothadvanced-andemergingmarketeconomies.Inmanyemergingmarketeconomies,theseissuesusedtobeverymuchattheforefrontuntiltheearly2000s.Forexample,Celasun,Gelos,andPrati(2004)foundthatfiscalvariableswereanimportantdeterminantofinflationexpectationsinmajoremergingmarketeconomies.Fiscalconsolidation,theadoptionofmorecrediblemacroeconomicandmonetaryframeworks,andthegrantingofautonomytocentralbankslessenedtheseconcernsintheseeconomiesoverthefollowingyears.However,centralbankcredibilityremainslessestablishedinsomeemergingmarketeconomies,whichasagrouparegenerallystillmorevulnerabletoexternalshocks.Althoughsovereignforeigncurrencyexposureshavefallen,currencymismatchesintheprivatesectorremainwidespread(BIS,2019),posingvulnerabilitiesthatultimatelycanthreatenthefiscalpositionoftheseeconomies.Becauseofthishistoricalbackgroundandthestructuralspecificitiesofemergingmarketeconomies,inthisstudywedifferentiatebetweenadvanced-andemergingmarketeconomies.

Severalotherstudieshaveempiricallyinvestigatedtherelationshipbetweenfiscalvariablesandinflationexpectationsinswithinflation-targetingcentralbanks(Catão&Terrones,2003;deMendonça&Machado,2013;Celasun,Gelos,andPrati,2004;Coibion,Gorodnichenko,andWeber,2021).Thesepapersfindgenerallythattighteningfiscalbalancesarehelpfulinreducinginflationexpectationsandobservedinflation,withstrongereffectsineconomieswithhighandpersistentinflation.Thispapertakesasomewhatdifferentapproachandcoversamuchlongerandrecentperiod.

INTERNATIONALMONETARYFUND6

Specifically,weinvestigatehowsovereigndebtmayaffectinflationdynamicsbyexaminingitsimpactoninflationexpectations.Foridentificationpurposes,wefocusondebtsurprises.Wetraceouttheresponseofinflationexpectationstoanunexpectedincreaseinsovereigndebtusinglocalprojections.Sinceweareinterestedintheeffectsofdebtanddebtsustainability,toavoidcapturingdemand-sideeffectsrelatedtounexpectedfiscalexpansions,wefocusonlong-runexpectations(5yearsahead),undertheassumptionthatanyinflationaryeffectsofsuchdemandpressuresareshorter-lived.Tofurtherminimizedemandeffects(suchasinitialpricepressuresleadingtoade-anchoringofinflationexpectationsunrelatedtolonger-termdebtconcerns),wealsoconditiononexistingdebtlevels.

Wefindthatinresponsetodebtsurprises,inflationexpectationsinemergingmarketeconomiesrisesignificantly,whereastheydonotinadvancedeconomies.Specifically,foremergingmarketeconomies,a10-percentage-pointincreaseinthegovernment-debt-to-GDPratiotriggersastatisticallysignificant20-basispointincreaseinlong-terminflationexpectationswithinthefirstyearaftertheshockandreachingapeakof70-basispointwithinthesecondyear.Theeffectismuchlargerinemergingmarketeconomiesthatdonotfeatureinflationtargetingregimescomparedtothosethatdo,becausetheseregimesaretypicallyassociatedwithsoundmonetaryframeworksandautonomouscentralbanksthathelpcontainexpectationsoffiscaldominance.TheseresultsarebroadlyconsistentwithearlieronesofCatãoandTerrones(2005)whofindastrongpositiveassociationbetweendeficitsandinflationamonghigh-inflationanddevelopingcountries,butnotamonglow-inflationadvancedeconomies.

However,inlinewiththenotionthatdebtsustainabilityconcernsarebehindourresults,theeffectoninflationexpectationsisnotpresentforemergingmarketeconomieswithlowsovereigndebtlevels.ThesefindingsareinlinewiththosebyKwon,McFarlane,andRobinson(2009),whoreportevidenceconsistentwiththenotionthattheriskofadebt-inflationtrapissignificantinhighlyindebtedeconomies.

TheoreticalMechanisms

Weareprimarilyinterestedintheextenttowhichgovernmentdebtandconcernsregardingsolvencyofthesovereignmightaffectmonetarypolicyandtheabilityofacentralbanktoachieveitspricestabilityobjective.Alargetheoreticalliteratureestablishesdirectlinksbetweengovernmentdebtandthepricelevel.Thestartingpointisfiscaldominance:thatacentralbanktightensitsmonetarypolicystanceinresponsetoariseininflationbylessthanitwouldotherwisebecauseofthelevelofgovernmentdebt.

Totheextentthatthegovernmentdebtisinlocalcurrency,highgovernmentdebtmayleadcentralbankstolimitincreasesinthepolicyrateoutofconcernforthegovernment’ssolvency.Economicagents,inturn,anticipatethisreaction,raisingtheirinflationexpectations.Intheextreme,firmsandhouseholdsmayfearthatthecentralbankmayresorttooutrightdebtmonetization.Implicitinthesemechanismsisthatsomeportionofgovernmentdebtisnotbackedbythegovernment’scurrentand

INTERNATIONALMONETARYFUND7

futureprimarysurpluses.TheseargumentsarewellestablishedbySargentandWallace(1981)andinsubsequentforward-lookingmodelsofinflation(AiyagariandGertler,1985;Calvo,1988;Bohn,1988,amongothers).AlthoughSargentandWallace(1981)neverdiscussthefiscalstanceordebtsustainability,thekeypointisthatthefiscalpathispredeterminedandneedstogenerateseigniorage.Acorollaryoftheseargumentsisthatatightermonetarypolicymaydeliverlowerinflationnow(andinextremecasesnoteventhat)butsurelyhigherinflationinthefutureiffiscalpolicydominatesmonetarypolicy.Thisisbecause(sufficiently)forward-lookingagentsanticipatetheneedforloosermonetarypolicylatertoinflateawaythepublicdebt.

AsimilarmechanismalbeitwithimportanttheoreticaldeparturesisdevelopedinthefiscaltheoryofthepricelevelorFTPL(Leeper1991,Sims1994,Woodford1994,Cochrane2005,andBenigno2020).ThecentralmechanismintheFTPListhatpricesadjustsothattherealvalueofgovernmentdebtequalsthepresentvalueoftaxeslessspending(Cochrane,2023).Morerecently,BianchiandMelosi(2022)developedatheoreticalframeworkwheremonetary-policyfiscalinteractionismoreacutewhenfiscalimbalancesarelargeandfiscalcredibilitywanes,makingitharderforthemonetaryauthoritytostabilizeinflationarounditsdesiredtarget.Intheirframework,afiscally-drivenriseintrendinflationdoesnotnecessarilystemfromalackofcredibilityofthecentralbank,butratherfromtheincompatibilitybetweentheobjectivesofthecentralbankandtheexpectedbehaviorofthefiscalauthorityincrediblystabilizingitsdebt.

Adifferent,butrelatedmechanismdevelopedmorerecentlyinArellanoandothers(2020)arguesthatsovereigndefaultriskonexternaldefaultablegovernmentdebtaffectsinflationexpectations.Intheirmodel,byassumption,inflationishigh(andconsumptionlow)wheneverthesovereigndefaultbecauseproductivityislow.Specifically,theyassumethattotalfactorproductivitydependsonthegovernment’screditstanding.Takingexpectations,whendefaultriskishigh,expectedinflationishigh.Thus,anyshockthatincreasesthesovereign’sdefaultrisk—forinstance,aproductivityoratermsoftradeshock—raises(near-term)inflationexpectations.Inthispaper,weidentifyshockstodebtthatareplausiblyorthogonaltoshocksthatmoveinflationandoutputandfindthattheseshocksarerelevantfortheconductofmonetarypolicyassummarizedbydislocationsoflong-termexpectationsinemergingmarketeconomies.Furthermore,weestablishthepresenceofnonlinearitiesbydemonstratinghighersensitivityofinflationexpectationstodebtsurprisesinhigh-debtandhigh-inflationemergingmarketeconomies.

DataandEmpiricalMethods

EconometricApproach

Ourgoalofassessinghowdebtsustainabilityconcernsmightimpingeonmonetarypolicyanditsabilitytoanchorinflationexpectationsfacesvariousempiricalchallenges,mostlyrelatedtoendogeneity.First,intherelationshipbetweendebtlevelsandinflation,causalityprobablyflowsbothways.Forexample,policymakersmaytightenfiscalpolicyinresponsetoariseininflationexpectations,whichcouldresultinanegativecorrelationofchangesindebtandinflationexpectations(Celasun,Gelos,andPrati,2004).Ontheotherhand,fiscalpolicyactionswhichaffect

INTERNATIONALMONETARYFUND8

debtmayalsodirectlyinfluenceinflationexpectationsthroughaggregatedemandeffects,whichwewouldliketoexclude.Second,theco-movementbetweendebtlevelsandinflationcouldbespuriousanddriveninsteadbyanomittedvariable.Particularlyinemergingmarketeconomies,adverseGDPshocksstemming,say,fromasuddenstopofcapitalflowsasaresultofchangesinglobalriskaversionoftencomealongwithexchangeratedepreciationsthatinduceariseininflationexpectations.Insuchsituations,wewouldobserveasimultaneousincreaseinthedebt-to-GDPratioandinflationexpectationsthatisnot(necessarily)drivenbythemechanismswearetryingtocapture.Moreover,informationshocksthatmanifestaspositiveornegativeinterestrateshocks—reflectingacentralbankcommunicatingasurprisinglypositiveornegativeeconomicoutlook—couldcausehigher/lowernominaldebtalongwithhigherorlowerinflationexpectations(Nunesandothers,2022).Also,othershockstoinflationexpectationsthathaveanimpactonthenominalinterestratebill(hence,ondebtsustainability)couldintroduceapositive(negative)biasforlocal(foreign)currencydenominatedinstruments(Celasunandothers,2004).

Moreover,sinceweareinterestedinmechanismsrelatedtothegovernment’sintertemporalbudgetconstraint,asdiscussedearlier,totheextentpossible,wewouldliketoexcludeshort-terminflationarydemandeffectsstemmingfromfiscalexpansions.

Toaddresstheseconcerns,wepursueathreefoldstrategy.First,weuseforecasterrorsfromvariousvintagesofInternationalMonetaryFund(IMF)WorldEconomicOutlook(WEO)publicationstoidentifyunanticipatedexogenousshocks(surprises)togovernmentdebt,whichbothmitigateendogeneityconcerns.Moreover,debtsurprisesmaycapturechangesindebtthatdonotnecessarilymoveone-for-onewiththebudgetdeficitandarelesslikelytobedrivenbychangesingovernmentexpenditures(Singhandothers,2005).Forexample,suchdebtsurprisesmayincludetherecognitionofhiddencontingentliabilities.Second,wefocusonlong-terminflationexpectations(i.e.,5-yearaheadexpectations),whicharelesslikelytobeaffectedbyshort-termaggregatedemandeffects(assumingreasonableestimatesofaggregatepricestickiness).Third,tofurtherreducetheinfluenceofaggregatedemandeffectsandsimultaneity,wealsoconditionourestimationsonexistingdebtlevels;ifdebtsurprisesaffectlong-terminflationexpectationsmorethehigherpre-existingdebtlevelsare,thisisunlikelytostemfromsuchdemandeffectsorothershocks.

ThedebtshocksaredefinedasthedifferencebetweentherealizedannualgrowthrateofthedebttoGDPratioandthecorrespondingIMFforecast,whichispublishedinOctober.Inotherwords,theshockisunanticipatedchangeinthedebt-to-GDPratiothatisobservedinthelastquarterofeachyear.Specifically,thedebtsurprise,debtforcountryiattimetisdefinedas:

debt=−

wherethelowercasedebtvariablesdenotedebt-to-GDPratios.

Asarguedintheliteraturethatusesthisapproach(e.g.,BlanchardandPerotti,2002;AuerbachandGorodnichenko,2012,2013;Abiadandothers,2016;FurceriandLi,2017),debtlevelsprojectedintheOctoberWEOpublicationsarelikelytoreflectallavailableinformationatthetimeofpublication.

IMFWORKINGPAPERS

DebtSurprisesandInflationExpectations

INTERNATIONALMONETARYFUND9

AnydifferencebetweenrealizednominaldebtlevelsandtheOctoberWEOprojectionsthusaremorelikelytoreflectunanticipatedpolicychangesordebtrevaluations.

Oneconcernwiththegovernment-debtforecasterrorsisthattheymaynotrepresenttruesurprises,becausetheymaybeforecastable.Toverifythesensitivityofourresultstosuchissues,weconsidertwoapproachesfromtheliterature.First,wefollowthemethodusedintheOctober2017WEOandMagudandPienknagura(2022)byregressingthedebtforecasterrorsonforecasterrorsofinflationandrealGDPgrowthandusingtheresidualsfromthisregressionasourdebtshock.Theotherapproach,whichfollowsAuerbachandGorodnichenko(2013),consistsofregressingthedebtforecasterrorsonlaggedmacroeconomicvariables—outputgap,debt,andprimarybalance—withwhichtheforecasterrorsmightbepredicted.Theresidualsfromthisregressionarethenusedasthedebtshock.Inbothapproaches,weincludeasetofcountryfixedeffects.Theresultsandconclusionsdiscussedbelowarequantitativelyandqualitativelyrobusttothesealternativeshocks.

Aspreviouslydiscussed,governmentdebtshockscanaffectinflationexpectationsthroughmultiplechannels.Theimpactoftheseshocksonlong-termexpectationswilldependonthemonetarypolicyregime,thedegreeofcentralbankindependenceandotherinstitutionalfeatures,andtheanchoringofinflationexpectations.Thus,analyzingthesensitivityoflong-terminflationexpectationstounexpectedshiftsingovernmentdebthelpsshedlightonwhethernon-aggregatedemandmechanismsareatwork.

WeusepanelregressionsandthelocalprojectionsmethodofJordà(2005)toestimatetheresponsesoflong-terminflationexpectationstotheidentifiedgovernmentdebtshocksoverdifferenthorizons.AsnotedbyAuerbachandGorodnichenko(2012),thelocalprojectionsapproacheasilyaccommodatesnonlinearitiesinimpulseresponsefunctionsandcross-countrycorrelationintheerrorterm.

Thebaselinespecificationweestimateisgivenby:

几(H)t+l=a+v+Fut−s+几(H)t−j+xΓ+ei,t+ℎ,l=4,10,16,22,26,and34,(1)

where几(H)t+ldenotesthemeasureofinflationexpectationsforhorizonHforcountryiattimet+l,ut−su,t−saredebtsurprises,xtXisavectorofcontrols(tobeintroducedlaterasrobustness),ihandvtharecountryandtimefixedeffects,andei,t+ℎisarandomdisturbance.Weincludelagsjofthedebtshocktoreduceconcernsthatthedynamicsoftheimpactareduetopropertiesoftheshock(i.e.,thattheshockispersistentandtosomeextentpredictable)2asopposedtotheoperatingmechanisms.Thecoefficients,F,oftheresponseofinflationexpectationstodebtsurprises

2Severalauthorshavepointedoutthatanalystforecasts,includingWEOforecasts,aretosomeextentpredictable(e.g.,Celasunandothers2021forGDPforecasts).Debtforecasts,inparticular,showpositiveerrorsthatincreasewithdebt-to-GDPratios,andwhicharestatecontingent.Asnotedabove,forrobustnesswefilterthedebtsurprisesonotherendogenousvariableswithwhichdebtsurprisesmightbeforecastableandfindthatourresultsarequalitativelyandquantitativelysimilar.

INTERNATIONALMONETARYFUND10

specificationareestimatedusingthewithinestimatorforeachprojectionperiod,withstandarderrorscomingfromDriscollandKraay’s(1998)heteroskedasticityandautocorrelation-consistentestimator.

Data

Thesampleincludes41emergingmarketanddevelopingeconomies,7low-incomeanddevelopingcountries,and34advancedeconomiesbetween2000and2020.3Wegrouptogetheremergingmarket-anddevelopingeconomies.Inflationexpectationsdataarecapturedusingsurvey-basedinflationforecastsfromprofessionalforecastersreportedbyConsensusEconomicsforfiveyearsahead.4Weuseinflationexpectationsdataatasemi-annualfrequencybecauseformostofoursample,intheConsensusEconomicsforecasts,long-terminflationforecastsareonlycollectedatasemi-annualfrequency(inAprilandOctober).Ourchoiceofexpectationsfromprofessionalforecastersisdrivensolelybytheconsistentavailabilityacrosscountriesofinflationexpectationsdata.5Dataongovernmentdebt,GDP,outputgap,andconsumerpriceinflationarefromtheIMF’sWEOdataset,whichcoversalleconomiesfrom1995to2019.Inconstructingourdebtshock,theforecastforgovernmentdebtandGDPforeachcountryinagivenyearistakenfromtheOctobervintageofWEOforecastsofthatyear.Therealizedvaluesofthesevariablesarethentakenfromthefollowingyear’sOctoberWEOdatabase.

Table1.SummaryStatistics

(Emerging)(Advanced)(Difference)

means.d.means.d.bt

Inf.Expectations,5-yrDebtSurprise

DebttoGDP

CPI,y-o-y

3.91

0.65

37.91

5.62

1.92

4.49

18.27

7.33

2.04

0.59

57.10

1.69

0.44

4.14

44.62

1.71

1.87***

0.06

-19.19***

3.93***

(17.92)

(0.19)

(-7.59)

(9.56)

Observations

352

426

778

WefollowFloresandothers(2023)incleaningthedatatominimizemeasurementerrorsandinconsiste

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

最新文档

评论

0/150

提交评论