药学专业英语视听说教程 课件 下篇 lecture 7-1 Post-market Surveillance_第1页
药学专业英语视听说教程 课件 下篇 lecture 7-1 Post-market Surveillance_第2页
药学专业英语视听说教程 课件 下篇 lecture 7-1 Post-market Surveillance_第3页
药学专业英语视听说教程 课件 下篇 lecture 7-1 Post-market Surveillance_第4页
药学专业英语视听说教程 课件 下篇 lecture 7-1 Post-market Surveillance_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩27页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

Lecture7Post-marketSurveillancemeta-analysissafetyspecificationwithdrawalpharmacovigilancedispensertriageblackboxwarningpsychiatrypediatricsteratogenicFTTTTOnlyasmallpercentageofpatientsparticipateinclinicaltrialsandsubsequentlyaverysmallpercentageofadversedrugreactionscanbedetectedduringthisperiodClinicaltrialsmainlyaimtoprovetheefficacyofadrugandthusasimpleprotocolthatremovesvariousinterferingfactorsisadoptedChildrenandpatientsover75yearsoldareusuallyexcludedfromclinicaltrials,buttheymaybeexposedtothedrugafterapprovalAllfactorssuchastheadministrationtimingofdrugs,testingscheduleandmonitoringarecontrolledunderprotocolsandspecialistsThedurationofaclinicaltrialisusuallyoneyear,shorterthanthedurationofreal-worldtreatmentThepossibilityofsafety-relatedproblemsishighatthebeginningduetolimitedinformation,butwillgraduallydecreaseduetotheaccumulationofsafety-relatedinformationsafetyandefficacyinformationofdrugsinactualclinicalpracticeaftermarketingappropriatefeedbacktopatientspositivebalanceriskminimizationadverseeffectassessedstakeholdersspecificationcharacterizeprofilemitigation1.InOctober2004,theFDAannouncedblackboxwarningassociatedwiththeuseofantidepressantsinpatientsundertheageof18.WhatwasthebasisfortheFDAtoissuethisblackboxwarning?TheFDAissuedthisblackboxwarningbasedonameta-analysisof24randomizedcontrolledtrialsthatlookedatyouthonantidepressants,includingSSRIsaswellasnon-SSRIs.Itwasfoundthattherewasanincreasedriskofsuicidalthinkingandbehavioramongpatientsreceivingtheactivedrugcomparedtothosereceivingplacebo.2.Aftertheblackboxwarningonantidepressantwasissued,therewasafollow-upstudythatwascompletedin2007.Whatdidthefollow-upstudyfind?----Thefollow-upstudyfoundthattherateofsuicidalityintheactivedruggroupwas3%comparedto2%forthosereceivingplaceboandthiswasnotstatisticallysignificant.----Thecalculatedriskdifferenceresultedinanumberneededtoharm(NNH)of112andanumberneededtotreat(NNT)of10.----Nocompletedsuicideswerereportedduringtheclinicaltrial.3.HowdidSSRIprescribingpatternschangeaftertheblackboxwarningwasissued?TherewasadecreaseduseofSSRIsinpediatricpopulation,andtherewasalsoashiftfromprimarycareprovidersprescribingthesemedicationstopsychiatrists.4.Whatshouldfamiliesbeinformedabout?----ThereisanFDAblackboxwarningforSSRIsinyouth.----ThiswarningwasissuedafterastudythatfoundtherewasincreasedsuicidalthinkingandbehaviorinyouthonSSRIs,butnotcompletedsuicides.Thisdatawasnotreplicatedinafollow-upstudy.----DecreasedSSRIsprescriptionresultedinincreasedsuicideratesindepressedyouth.----ThebenefitsoftreatingwithSSRIsfaroutweightherisks.Itisextremelyimportanttomonitorforsuicidality.5.HowtomonitorforkidswhoareonSSRIs?----Thegreatestriskforsuicidalityoccurswithmedicationinitiationanddosechangesandsomakesuretopayextraattentionduringthesetimes.----Frequentmonitoringforsuicidalityhasbeenfoundtoreducetheriskofsuicide.----Weeklycheck-insafterstartingthemedicationorincreasingadoseisneeded.----Don’tbeafraidtoasksuicidality.FTFTTFT1.WhydoesFDArequireREMSonlenalidomide?Lenalidomide,similartothalidomide,hasbeenassociatedwithsevere,life-threatening,orfatalbirthdefects.Therefore,itiscrucialtoimplementstrictmeasurestopreventwomenofchild-bearingagefromtakinglenalidomide.Thisincludesusingtwoformsofeffectivecontraception,undergoingregularpregnancytesting,andimmediatelystoppinglenalidomideifpregnancyissuspected.2.WhatarethestrategiesintheREMSprogramtoreducetheriskofusinglenalidomide?----Patientregistry:AllpatientstakinglenalidomidemustberegisteredtomonitortheirsafetyandcompliancewiththeREMSprogram.----Prescriberanddispensertrainingandcertification:Healthcareprovidersmustundergospecializedtrainingandobtaincertificationtoprescribeanddispenselenalidomide.----Patienteducation:Providepatientswithclearandconciseinformationaboutlenalidomide'srisksandbenefits.----PeriodicReviewandAssessment:TheREMSprogramforlenalidomideissubjecttoperiodicreviewandassessmentbytheFDA.Thisensuresthattheprogramremainseffectiveinminimizingrisksandmaximizingbenefitsovertime.3.ShouldthalidomideanditsderivativelenalidomidebeusedagaineventhoughaREMSprogramisrequiredbyFDA?WhatdoyouthinkarethechallengesofimplementingREMS?Whetherthalidomideanditsderivativelenalidomideshouldbeusedagain,eventhoughaRiskEvaluationandMitigationStrategies(REMS)programisrequiredbytheFDA,isacomplexquestionthatinvolvesconsideringmultiplefactors.TherapeuticEffects:Thalidomideandlenalidomidehavedemonstratedtherapeuticeffectsintreatingcertainconditions,suchasmultiplemyelomaandmyelodysplasticsyndromes(MDS).Lenalidomide,inparticular,hasbecomeafirst-linetreatmentforlower-riskMDSwitha5qdeletion.SafetyConcerns:Thalidomidewasinitiallywithdrawnfromthemarketduetosevereteratogeniceffects,causingbirthdefectsknownas"phocomelia"or"seallimbs".Bothdrugshavespecificsideeffectsandrisks,whichneedtobecarefullymanaged.Thedecisiontousethalidomideandlenalidomide,despitetherequirementforaREMSprogram,shouldbebasedonacomprehensiveassessmentofthepatient'scondition,thepotentialbenefitsandrisksofthemedication,andtheavailabilityofalternativetreatments.ItiscrucialtoensurethatpatientsandprovidersarefullyinformedandcompliantwiththeREMSrequirementstominimizepotentialharm.ChallengesofImplementingREMS----PatientCompliance:EnsuringthatpatientsunderstandandcomplywiththesafetymeasuresoutlinedintheREMSprogramcanbechallenging.Patientsmaynotfullyappreciatetheseverityoftherisksassociatedwiththemedicationormayforgettofollowtheprescribedsafetyprotocols.----ProviderTrainingandAwareness:ProvidersneedtobethoroughlytrainedontheREMSprogramandthespecificrisksassociatedwiththemedication.EnsuringthatallproviderswhomayprescribeordispensethemedicationareawareofandcomplywiththeREMSrequirementscanbedifficult.----ResourceAllocation:ImplementingaREMSprogramrequiressignificantresources,includingfundingforpatienteducationmaterials,providertrainingprograms,andmonitoringsystems.Theseresourcesmaynotbeavailableormaybelimitedincertainhealthcaresettings.----RegulatoryOversight:TheFDAneedstocontinuouslymonitorandevaluatetheeffectivenessoftheREMSprogram.EnsuringcompliancewiththeREMSrequirementsandtakingappropriateenforcementactionsfornon-compliancecanbechallengingandresource-intensive.1.WhywasVioxxwithdrawnfromthemarketinspiteofthefactthatitwasdesignedtobeasaferNSAID?----Vioxxwaswithdrawnfromthemarketbecausestudiesshowedadoubledincreaseinheartattackandstrokerisksamongpatientstakingthedrug.Thisdiscoveryraisedserioussafetyconcerns,promptingMerck,themanufacturer,tovoluntarilyrecallVioxxfromthemarketinSeptember2004.----Thedrughadbeenwidelyprescribedforthetreatmentofosteoarthritic,menstrual,andacutepaininadults,anditswithdrawalcausedsignificantcontroversyandconcern,asithadbeentakenbyapproximately20millionpeopleworldwideandwasestimatedtohavecausedatleast50,000deaths.2.WhydidtheFDAapprovalprocesscomeunderfirebycriticsafterthewithdrawalofVioxx?Firstly,thecontroversiallawpassedin1992allowedtheFDAtochargeuserfeestomanufacturers,withtheintentionofspeedinguptheapprovalprocessbyhiringadditionaldrugreviewers.However,criticsarguedthatthislawleftlessmoneyforpost-approvalmonitoring,potentiallyleadingtomissedsafetyconcerns.Secondly,itwasrevealedthroughlaterleaksofMerckdocumentsthatstudiesasearlyas1998mayhavesuggestedtheincreasedriskofcardiaceventsassociatedwithVioxx,yetthedrugstillreceivedonlyasix-monthpriorityreview.ThisraisedquestionsaboutthethoroughnessoftheFDA'sreviewprocess.Additionally,someassertedthatthefinancialcontributionsofdrugcompaniesmadetheFDAlesslikelytoconfrontthem,whichcouldhaveinfluencedtheagency'sdecision-makingregardingVioxx.3.WhoshouldbeblamedfortheoccurrenceofVioxxdisaster?TheoccurrenceoftheVioxxdisasterisacomplexissuethatinvolvesmultiplepartiesandfactors.Itisnotstraightforwardtoassignblametoasingleentity.However,severalpartiescouldpotentiallybeheldaccountable:----Merck&Co.,themanufacturerofVioxxMerckisultimatelyresponsibleforensuringthesafetyandefficacyofitsdrugs.CriticsarguethatMerckmayhavedownplayedoroverlookedpotentialsafetyrisksassociatedwithVioxx,particularlyitscardiovascularsideeffects.Thecompany'smarketingefforts,whichfocusedonabroadconsumerbaseratherthanspecificpatientgroups,mayhavealsocontributedtothedisasterbypromotingthedrugtopatientswhowereathigherriskofadverseevents.----TheFoodandDrugAdministration(FDA)Astheregulatorybodyresponsibleforapprovingnewdrugs,theFDAhasadutytoensurethatdrugsonthemarketaresafeandeffective.CriticshaveaccusedtheFDAofbeingoverlyreliantonthemanufacturer'sdataandofnotconductingthoroughenoughreviewsofnewdrugs.Additionally,theagency'sfocusonspeedinguptheapprovalprocessthroughuserfeesmayhavecompromiseditsabilitytoadequatelymonitordrugspost-approval.----PhysiciansandhealthcareprovidersWhilephysiciansarenotdirectlyresponsibleforthedevelopmentorapprovalofdrugs,theyplayacrucialroleinprescribingmedicationstopatients.CriticsarguethatsomephysiciansmayhavebeenoverlyreliantondrugcompanymarketingandmaynothaveadequatelyinformedpatientsaboutthepotentialrisksassociatedwithVioxx.4.IsitpossibleforVioxxtocomeback?Whyandwhynot?ReasonsforUnlikelyReturn----SeriousSafetyConcerns:Vioxxwaswithdrawnfromthemarketduetoserioussafetyconcerns,particularlyitsassociationwithanincreasedriskofcardiovasculareventssuchasheartattacksandstrokes.Thisriskwasidentifiedthroughclinicaltrialsandpost-marketingsurveillance.ThewithdrawalofVioxxwasasignificantblowtoMerck&Co.,themanufacturer,whichfacednumerouslawsuitsandsubstantialfinanciallossesasaresultofthedrug'ssafetyissues.----RegulatoryBarriers:TheFDAhasstrictregulationsinplacetoensurethesafetyandefficacyofdrugsonthemarket.Anydrugseekingre-approvalafterbeingwithdrawnwouldneedtodemonstrateahighlevelofsafetyandefficacy.GiventheserioussafetyconcernsassociatedwithVioxx,itwouldbedifficultforthedrugtomeettheFDA'sstandardsforre-approval.----PublicPerce

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论