供应商评分体系

PurchasingSupplierRatingSystem供应商评分体系SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)SRSSCORECARDSRS记分卡KeyPerformanceMeasurables可测量的关键绩效：RPPM 百万不合格品率 25PointsWrittenComplaints记录下的报怨 15PointsDelivery 交付 20PointsService 服务 10PointsCompetitiveness 竞争力 30PointsTOTAL 总分 100PointsToolforRapidCommunication-Monthly快速交流的工具－每月SeniorManagementAwarenessatSupplier

帮助高级管理层了解供应商状况SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)SRSSCORECARDLEVELS SRS记分卡等级Corporate集团级Supplier’soverallperformance供应商全部的业绩Specificsupplierlocation’soverallperformance特定供应商地点的全部业绩Division(availablebyrequestonly)分支机构（只在有要求时适用）Supplier’soverallperformanceataLearDivision

在一个李尔分支机构中，供应商的全部业绩Specificsupplierlocation’soverallperformanceataLearDivision

在一个李尔分支机构中，特定供应商地点的全部业绩LocationSupplier’sperformanceatasingleLearfacility在单独一个李尔工厂中，供应商的业绩Specificsupplierlocation’sperformanceatasingleLearfacility

在单独一个李尔工厂中，特定供应商地点部业绩SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)SRSSCORECARDDISTRIBUTIONSRS记分卡的发布Approximately2ndweekofeachmonth 大约每月第二周Computerauto-fax,fromLearCorporationorLearDivision

计算机自动传送,从李尔集团或李尔分支机构。President’sLevel总裁级Acorporatescorecard集团级的记分卡PlantLevelScorecards工厂级的记分卡SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)ScoringCriteria-RejectedPartsPerMillion(RPPM):评分标准－百万不合格品率（RPPM）TheRPPMcategoryaccountsfor25pointsoftheoverallscorecardrating. RPPM的分数占整个记分卡总分的25分SupplierRPPMiscalculatedonthebasisoftheamountofnon-conformingmaterialsvs.thetotalamountofmaterialsreceivedinagivenfiscalmonth.供应商的RPPM值是在一个财务月份中，不合格品数量与收到所有材料的比值Thiscalculationisthennormalizedtoreflectaconstantbasisofonemillionunitsreceived. 这个公式被规范化用以反映收到的每一百万件的一致性。SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)ScoringCriteria-RejectedPartsPerMillion(RPPM):评分标准－百万不合格品率Example例如:

Asupplierships100,000partstoaplant.Ofthoseparts,tenarefoundtobenon-conforming. 一家供应商发运了十万件到工厂里，在那些零件中发现有十件不合格。TheRPPMwillbecalculatedas那RPPM的计算应为: (10/100,000)x1,000,000=100RPPMThesupplier’sscoreforthisexamplewillbe22points此例中，供应商的分数为22分SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)

Thefollowingtableoutlinespartspermillionrangesandtheirrespectivescores下列表格是对PPM范围与他们所对应分数的略述：

RPPMRating

Score

RPPMRating Score 0–25 25 351-375 11 26-50 24 376-400 10 51-75 23 401-450 9 76-100 22 451-500 8 101–125 21 501–550 7 126–150 20 551-600 6 151–175 19 601–650 5 176–200 18 651-700 4 201–225 17 701-750 3 226–250 16 751-800 2 251–275 15 801-850 1 276–300 14 851orgreater 0 301–325 13 326–350 12 SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)ScoringCriteria-QualityNotices/WrittenComplaints评分标准－质量通知/记录下来的抱怨TheQualityNotices/WrittenComplaintcategoryaccountsfor15pointsoftheoverallscorecard.

质量通知/记录下来的抱怨项目占总记分卡的15分ThesystemratesSuppliersonthenumberofformalrejectionnoticesorwrittencomplaintsandtheseverityofeachcomplaintwiththefollowingformula供应商评分系统中，正式拒收通知或记录下来抱怨的数量与每种抱怨的严重程度遵循以下公式：(Thenumberofoccurrencesperclassificationcode)x (severityindex)每种等级所出现的次数X严重度指数SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)Level0 EngineeringIssues 0.00pointsperoccurrence

工程问题 0.00分/次Level1 MinorIssues 0.10pointsperoccurrence

小问题 0.10分/次Level2 RepeatMinorIssues 0.25pointsperoccurrence

重复出现的小问题 0.25分/次Level3 MajorIssues 0.50pointsperoccurrence

主要问题 0.50分/次Level4 SevereIssues 1.00pointsperoccurrence

严重问题 1.00分/次SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)ScoringCriteria-QualityNotices/WrittenComplaints评分标准－质量通知/记录下来的抱怨Example例如:

AsupplierreceivesonewrittencomplaintinLevel1andtwo writtencomplaintsinLevel2.

一个供应商收到1个Level1和2个Level2的抱怨Thetotalnumberofpointswillbecalculatedas所得分数为:(1x0.10)+(2x0.25)=0.60totalThesupplier’sscoreinthisexamplewillbe9points此例供应商所得分数为9分SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)ThefollowingtableoutlinestheQualityNoticeRatingrangesandtheirrespectivescores:下列表表格是是对质质量通通知评评分范范围与与他们们所对对应分分数的的略述述QualityNoticeQualityNoticeRatingPointsSCORERatingPointsSCORESupplierRatingSystem(SRS)SCORINGCRITERIA-Delivery评分标标准-交交货货TheDeliveryCategoryaccountsfor20pointsoftheoverallScorecard交货项项目得得分占占总得得分卡卡的20分分DeliveryRatingsarecalculatedonthebasisofthenumberofshipmentsinagivenfiscalmonth交货的的评分分是以以在一一个指指定的的财务务月份份发运运次数数为基基础来来计算算的Thisinformationisthencalculatedintoapercentage这类信信息要要计算算成百百分数数SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)SCORINGCRITERIA-Delivery评分标标准-交交货货DeliveryratingsaredeterminedbytheoccurrenceofthefollowingcriteriawhenitisdeterminedtobetheSupplier’sresponsibility:交贷分分级与与下列列情况况的出出现相相关,而且且已确确认是是供应应商的的责任任LateDeliveries交货晚晚了PremiumFreightOccurrences额外运运费的的出现现DamagedParts零件损损坏OverShipmentoftheQuantityOrdered超出定定货数数量的的发运运EarlyDeliveries提早交交货ShortShipmentoftheQuantityOrdered少于定定货数数量的的发运运Thepotentialformorethanoneoccurrencepershipmentdoesexist.也可能能有上上述一一种以以上的的情况况出现现在同同一次次发运运中.SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)SCORINGCRITERIA-Delivery评分标标准-交交货货Example例如:Asuppliersends36shipmentsforthemonth.Ofthose36shipments,oneislateandoneisshortofthequantityordered.Thiscountsastwooccurrences.一个供供应商商这个个月发发了36次次货.在在这36次次中发发运中中,一一次次晚了了,一一次次发运运数量量少了了.故故作作为两两次计计算.Thedeliverypercentagewillbecalculatedas:交货百分分比计算算为:[(36-2)/36]x100=94.4%TheSupplier’’sscoreforthisexamplewillbe13points此例供应应商的得得分就为为13分分.SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)ThefollowingtableoutlinesDeliveryOccurrence%ScoretheDeliveryPercentagesand10020theirrespectivescores:99.2–99.91998.4–99.118下列表格格是对交交货百分分率97.6–98.317与他们所所对应分分数的略略述:96.8–97.51696.0–96.71595.2–95.91494.4–95.11393.6–94.31292.8–93.51192.0–92.71091.2–91.9990.4–91.1889.6–90.3788.8––89.5688.0––88.7587.2––87.9486.4––87.1385.6––86.3284.8––85.5184.7orless0SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)SCORINGCRITERIA-Service/Responsiveness评分标准-服务务/反馈TheService/Responsivenesscategoryaccountsfor10pointsoftheoverallScorecard.服务/反馈馈怨项目占占总记分卡卡的10分分ServiceRatingsaredeterminedonthebasisofthefollowingcriteria:由以下的标标准为基础础,来决决定服务等等级OntimeandaccurateProductionPartApprovalProcess(PPAP),asrequired按要求,准准时及正正确的PPAPOntimeandaccurateresponsetoqualityissues,includingplantvisitsperLear’’srequest.对质量问题题的准时及及正确的反反馈,包包括按李尔尔要求参观观工厂Ontimeandaccuratedocumentationasrequiredbyeachlocation,includingbutnotlimitedtoSPC,Certifications,invoices,packingslips,etc.按每个工厂厂的要求,准时及及正确的文文件提交,包括但但不仅限于于SPC,证书,发发票,装装箱单等.SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)SCORINGCRITERIA-Service/Responsiveness评分标准-服务务/反馈Example例如:ASupplierfailstosubmitontimeforthelatestengineeringlevelintheProductionPartApprovalProcess(PPAP)一家供应商商没能按时时提交零件件最新工程程等级的PPAPTheSupplier’’sScoreforthisexampleis9points此例中,供供应商的的得分为9分.SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)ThefollowingtableoutlinestheService/Responsivenessoccurrencesandtheirrespectivescores:下列表格是是对服务/反馈事故故出现次数数与他们所所对应分数数的略述ServiceIncidentsScore010192735435orgreater0SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)ScoringCriteria-Competitiveness评分标准-竞争争力TheCompetitivenesscategoryaccountsfor30pointsoftheoverallscorecardrating.服务/反馈馈怨项目占占总记分