跨国交易的风险_第1页
跨国交易的风险_第2页
跨国交易的风险_第3页
跨国交易的风险_第4页
跨国交易的风险_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩7页未读, 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

1、Risk in Cross-Border Transactions: The Wells Fargo v.Citibank Case,Company Introduction,Wells Fargo,CitiBank,LEGAL BATTLE,Wells Fargo,VS,Citibank,CAUSES,In June 1983 WFAL made two six-month deposits of &1 million each with Citibanks Manila branch .,On October 15, 1983, the Philippine government impo

2、sed exchange controls requiring prior approval by the central bank for repayments of principal on foreign obligations to foreign banks.,Add YourIn December 1983, Citibank did not repaythe deposits when matured .,In February 1984, Wells Fargo took legal action.,SOCIAL VIEWPOINT,The WFAL deposits were

3、 booked in the Philippine and thus subject to the sovereign risk of the Philippines.,For Citibank (Manila or New York) to have repaid the deposits at maturity without government approval would have flouted the spirit and possibly the letter of the Philippine law.,FOCAL POINT,Was the matter a questio

4、n for Philippine or New York using its worldwide assets, would this contravene the Philippine exchange control law?,TENDENCY,The Department of State, the U.S. Treasury, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the office of the Comptroller of t

5、he Currency, and the Solicitor General filed a friend-of-the-court brief supporting Citibank.,The U.S. circuit court finally ruled in favor of Wells Fargo on June 26, 1991.,JUDGMENT,REASONS,WFAL could have stipulated that collection on its Manila deposits. Be made at Citibank (New York) , in effect

6、demanding a parental guarantee on repayment of the deposits. If this had been done, presumably the rate ofinterest on Citibank (New York) .,The court found that Citibank had not satisfied its good faith obligation to seek the Philippine governments approval to repay the WFAL deposits.,The Citibank b

7、ranch in Manila was not a separate Legal entity, Philippine law would not be violated by a repayment from Citibanks worldwide assets.,QUESTIONS,1,2,3,Why didnt Citibank repay WFAL deposits when they matured?,On what ground did the U.S. circuit court finally rule in favor of Wells Fargo?,What can be learned from the Wells v. Citibank case about the risk in cross-border financial transactions?,No.3,Concerned about local g

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论